Guest StuCotts Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 It used to be that the escort's name and city invariably appeared under each photo. Now the city is more hit-and-miss. New policy? I note a comment about Rafael Alencar, fully deserved, at the head of my review. Is this going to be the case for all reviewed escorts? Some of them? Only the ones who inspire exclamations? I ask only out of curiosity. No big deal if you answer at your leisure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members TampaYankee Posted July 31, 2008 Members Share Posted July 31, 2008 It used to be that the escort's name and city invariably appeared under each photo. Now the city is more hit-and-miss. New policy? Hit and miss has not yet been raised to the level of a policy. I just noticed and have no idea what has changed to cause that. Will investigate. I note a comment about Rafael Alencar, fully deserved, at the head of my review. Is this going to be the case for all reviewed escorts? Some of them? Only the ones who inspire exclamations? Only when the admin is moved to undertake triple backflips followed by a cold shower. More seriously, I will (on rare occasions only, hopefully) offer an admin comment when moved to do so as I have in the past. Reasons range from: noting information about the escort, to remarking about something notable about the review, to that irresistable backflip urge. Only rarely, hopefully, but maybe not. The purpose is to be informative or to exhibit irresistable need to drool in public. Stay tuned for one on the next review. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I will (on rare occasions only, hopefully) offer an admin comment when moved to do so as I have in the past. Reasons range from: noting information about the escort, to remarking about something notable about the review, to that irresistable backflip urge. Only rarely, hopefully, but maybe not. The admin note on today's KyleGibson review is on point, and appreciated. http://www.maleescortreview.com/index.php?...rt_id=208060006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StuCotts Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 The admin note on today's KyleGibson review is on point, and appreciated.http://www.maleescortreview.com/index.php?...rt_id=208060006 I'm dense. I'll blame it on the heat. But I don't understand the implication of the note. A close-enough-to-be-suspicious coziness between client and escort? I hope it's not bad form to ask. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I'm dense. I'll blame it on the heat. But I don't understand the implication of the note. A close-enough-to-be-suspicious coziness between client and escort? I hope it's not bad form to ask. TY suspects, and I believe, that the review was written by the escort. So much is told from the escort's viewpoint, rather than the client's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StuCotts Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 TY suspects, and I believe, that the review was written by the escort. So much is told from the escort's viewpoint, rather than the client's. I read the review when it was posted, found it to be too many words saying too little, and gave up part way through. In the light of your post I went to it again and made it to the end. My original impression was reinforced tenfold, but I don't think I could have come to your conclusion and TY's without the prompting. That brought home to me how superficial a level I read the reviews on, compared to you practised rune readers. If it's going to be a policy for Management to light the way of the benighted with respect to reviews, I'll be grateful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
