February 14, 200818 yr I suppose there's as much reason to rejoice as to deplore, but after all the initial huffing and puffing I expected something more than this dull thud. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/washingt...amp;oref=slogin
February 14, 200818 yr I imagine they thought, "why bother? He's already destroyed." It seems a fair enough penalty for his part of the sleaze. Hypocrisy isn't against senate ethics rules, and that's what he's really guilty of.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.