July 9, 200917 yr Today optional. Tomorrow mandatory? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/fashion/...amp;ref=fashion
July 9, 200917 yr Today optional. Tomorrow mandatory?http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/fashion/...amp;ref=fashion 'Twould be a great pity, in my estimate. I love the smooth twink look as much as anyone, but shaved pubes and pits turn me right off.
July 10, 200917 yr Active Members On the other hand, a furry back just doesn't do it for me. Different strokes and all that.
July 10, 200917 yr 'Twould be a great pity, in my estimate. I love the smooth twink look as much as anyone, but shaved pubes and pits turn me right off. So it would. But a trend is a trend is a trend, and I see it as inexorable. My own tastes lean toward natural body hair, within limits. Thickets of what looks like combed-out Brillo pads leave me cold.
July 10, 200917 yr a trend is a trend is a trend Regrettably. One can nonetheless register one's distaste. My own tastes lean toward natural body hair, within limits. Indeed! A particular treat is when a favorite twink shows up slightly less groomed than usual. Thickets of what looks like combed-out Brillo pads leave me cold. As the grave.
July 11, 200917 yr Active Members So far all the posters on this thread seem to be of like mind. So, please add my ditto to the list. Best regards, RA1
July 13, 200917 yr Active Members It is a trend, according to the SF Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?.../LV2V18I8S6.DTL
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.