September 15, 201016 yr Today's review of Leonard has got to be one of the finest and most helpful reviews ever written. If it were not for reviews such as these, I can cautiously say, we would all be the worse for the wear. My only question is why wasn't he made cover-boy of the day?
September 15, 201016 yr Active Members Today's review of Leonard has got to be one of the finest and most helpful reviews ever written. If it were not for reviews such as these, I can cautiously say, we would all be the worse for the wear. My only question is why wasn't he made cover-boy of the day? It seems to me that this question is better posed over there, no?
September 15, 201016 yr It seems to me that this question is better posed over there, no? Two words: Rhetorical sarcasm.
September 15, 201016 yr Active Members Two words: Rhetorical sarcasm. Even so, it seems the prime audience is over there, no? If the purpose is to provoke thought about the site management it seems most relevant to the site participants. Not to turn his into an unending dialog.
September 15, 201016 yr Ummm, ok. The mix of your 'two words' and 'over there' present the potential for a very long thread, no? I love popcorn.
September 15, 201016 yr Even so, it seems the prime audience is over there, no? No. No it isn't. The audience, IMHO is anywhere and with anyone who relies or has interest in the written review of gay male escorts. My post point was not to critique or criticize a particular management group; but only to have had a light and sarcastic moment with those here who share in the same interest of these most helpful reviews. Would you prefer I had gone "Baby Jane" on them?
September 15, 201016 yr Active Members No. No it isn't. The audience, IMHO is anywhere and with anyone who relies or has interest in the written review of gay male escorts. My post point was not to critique or criticize a particular management group; but only to have had a light and sarcastic moment with those here who share in the same interest of these most helpful reviews. I guess this is just one of those examples where sarchasm doesnt always survive the medium -- at least in my case. Not unusal as conveying inflective qualities to the posted word is challenging, if not for one end of the comunication then for the other. Would you prefer I had gone "Baby Jane" on them? What in my replies gave you that impression?
September 15, 201016 yr What in my replies gave you that impression? Probably just the fact that you had edited your post after I had responded so what I was responding to, or thought I was responding to was no longer there. Ugh! Now my head is spinning!
September 15, 201016 yr Active Members Probably just the fact that you had edited your post after I had responded so what I was responding to, or thought I was responding to was no longer there. Ugh! Now my head is spinning! Actually, I edited my post before you responded but after you began to craft your reply. I checked that no response existed when I edited -- beginning and end. So I was a bit surprised when your post showed shortly after. I thought I had made it clean but obviously you had already snagged my oringial post in your quote window. The reason for the edit was that I had a more substantive remark I wanted to make and didnt think the original offered much. Everyone can make up their own mind as both versions exist under my name and your response. I still do not see in either any support for your conjecture. But it is of no importance that this point.
September 15, 201016 yr Actually, I edited my post before you responded but after you began to craft your reply. I checked that no response existed when I edited -- beginning and end. So I was a bit surprised when your post showed shortly after. I thought I had made it clean but obviously you had already snagged my oringial post in your quote window. The reason for the edit was that I had a more substantive remark I wanted to make and didnt think the original offered much. Everyone can make up their own mind as both versions exist under my name and your response. I still do not see in either any support for your conjecture. But it is of no importance that this point. I surrender!
September 16, 201016 yr Active Members TY, if you bought that, you probably own several underwater lots around Florida too. Matrix is just reloading.
September 16, 201016 yr TY, if you bought that, you probably own several underwater lots around Florida too. Matrix is just reloading. No, no, he wore me down MsGuy fair and square. I was starting to have analysis paralysis and when that happens I just go limp.
September 16, 201016 yr Very funny thread after a long 24 hour flight. I got in late and went to the link in the first post and could not find the wording for the review. I had to look a few times and then I saw that very nice sentence. A man of few words... Like me.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.