August 17, 201511 yr These lists are usually fairly ridiculous but this one I like a lot. His selection and also his notes on each title: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/aug/17/the-100-best-novels-written-in-english-the-full-list
August 27, 201511 yr Author P.S. In that article, I just noticed that each book title is a hyperlink that leads to a full-length article on the respective book.
August 29, 201511 yr Active Members I am ashamed to say I have only read 32 of these BUT my personal interest turned to more technical books some *#* years ago. I still read some 25 or so fiction or non-fiction books a year, as well as a big pile of technical books, articles, magazines, etc. I used to read while riding the airlines between jobs. Now I read while waiting on my pax. Best regards, RA1
August 29, 201511 yr Author I am ashamed to say I have only read 32 of these That puts you ahead of me! The article-length review/appreciations of each book, behind the hyperlinks in that article, remind me of the ones I want to read, or re-read. Or finish reading! Several of the major ones I started in college, and read just enough of not to look entirely stupid in seminar.
August 30, 201511 yr Active Members This is list is acceptable in its own right, but it is devoid of any authors of "color." Ralph Ellison's The Invisible Man should have been listed here as well as one by James Baldwin and Toni Morrison. Did I see any titles by John Steinbeck? These "lists," so to speak are so subjective!!!
August 30, 201511 yr Author Those are all excellent points. I agree absolutely that Ellison and Baldwin are grievous omissions. Instead of (or in addition to) Toni Morrison, I would add Zora Neale Hurston.
August 30, 201511 yr Active Members Are not lists and books subjective by definition? Should we be reading Joseph? Best regards, RA1
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.