May 20, 20197 yr New York Times releases explosive report on Russia-linked bank Employee says ‘nothing happened’ after she raised concerns https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/may/19/deutsche-bank-trump-kushner-russia-new-york-times
May 20, 20197 yr Active Members As much as I dislike Trump and his behavior, the form (Suspicious Activity Report - SAR) discussed in the article is a standard form that even a small dollar amount will trigger its filing. That amount is only $5,000.00. There were approximately two million SARs filed in 2017 against various people and entities that had dealings with Banks and Western Union, Paypal and similar type financial companies. As the article discussed, the government did nothing about the form filed against Trump and his buddy, Kuschner. With more than two million SAR documents filed in 2017, can anyone take a guess where the government would find the manpower to pursue any possible wrongdoing against any perpetrator or against the subject of such a SAR form? The form is really a scare tactic and has little meaning. Few SARs are ever pursued by the government. Thus, our hideous King Trump, remains quite quick and well, doing as he pleases, while appearing immune to any laws, especially the laws surrounding the Constitution of the U.S. It is a shame that the prestigious New York Times did not look into the uselessness of the form before the article sparked hope in some of its readers. If anyone wants to be bored to death about what a SAR is, here is a relatively short article that explains its purpose and its useless functions. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/suspicious-activity-report.asp More exciting nonsense reading: https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/olm_015.htm Edited May 20, 20197 yr by mvan1
May 20, 20197 yr Author When my boss and I would get bored and tired in the middle of the night fighting a deadline to put to press one of our buyers’ guides to CAD/CAM/CAE software, one of us would pull out a volume of the CCH U.S. tax code http://www.cch.com/About/, and declaim aloud therefrom in a voice as if it were Scripture.
May 22, 20197 yr Active Members On 5/20/2019 at 1:42 PM, mvan1 said: As much as I dislike Trump and his behavior, the form (Suspicious Activity Report - SAR) discussed in the article is a standard form that even a small dollar amount will trigger its filing. That amount is only $5,000.00. There were approximately two million SARs filed in 2017 against various people and entities that had dealings with Banks and Western Union, Paypal and similar type financial companies. As the article discussed, the government did nothing about the form filed against Trump and his buddy, Kuschner. With more than two million SAR documents filed in 2017, can anyone take a guess where the government would find the manpower to pursue any possible wrongdoing against any perpetrator or against the subject of such a SAR form? The form is really a scare tactic and has little meaning. Few SARs are ever pursued by the government. Thus, our hideous King Trump, remains quite quick and well, doing as he pleases, while appearing immune to any laws, especially the laws surrounding the Constitution of the U.S. It is a shame that the prestigious New York Times did not look into the uselessness of the form before the article sparked hope in some of its readers. If anyone wants to be bored to death about what a SAR is, here is a relatively short article that explains its purpose and its useless functions. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/suspicious-activity-report.asp More exciting nonsense reading: https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/olm_015.htm This really puts things into perspective
May 27, 20197 yr Active Members On 5/20/2019 at 8:23 AM, AdamSmith said: When my boss and I would get bored and tired in the middle of the night fighting a deadline to put to press one of our buyers’ guides to CAD/CAM/CAE software, one of us would pull out a volume of the CCH U.S. tax code http://www.cch.com/About/, and declaim aloud therefrom in a voice as if it were Scripture. I could say much the same about FAR's (Federal Air Regulations). However, what strikes me is your statement about having a boss. I know you never actively had one, so to speak. Best regards, RA1
May 27, 20197 yr Author 5 hours ago, RA1 said: I could say much the same about FAR's (Federal Air Regulations). However, what strikes me is your statement about having a boss. I know you never actively had one, so to speak. Best regards, RA1 We learned enormous amounts from each other. I far more than he, obviously. But (to repeat myself) there came a time about 10 years into it that, if we disagreed, I would go off and do it my way anyway. And he would stand back, and not interfere at all.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.