Moses

this is just regular tear gases, every state uses it, even on own citizens... speaking about chlorpicrine - Ukrainians started to use it right from 2022

that exactly why I pointed what Ukrainian state blew up cafe in Sankt-Petersburg. 40civilians. 156 civilians injured in Sevastopol on the beach. Would you like confirm what both cases are "legitimate"?

An explosion at the entrance to a residential building is definitely a terrorist act. Not only the target is important, but also the location.

And by the way, your headline is completely propaganda and false: Kirillov was not "General of Russian chemical/biological/nuclear weapons", he was the head of the troops for protection against chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. These troops develop protection and eliminate the consequences of the use of such weapons. They were the ones who dealt with Chernobyl in the first week after the accident and more than 1000 soldiers and officers died there. Here in WIKI there is more about the troops https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_NBC_Protection_Troops And when COVID came, it was Kirillov who headed the Russian work on developing a vaccine against COVID, for the fact that under his leadership Russia was the first in the world to receive "Sputnik", Kirillov was awarded the highest order of Russia, which is called "Hero of Labor", this is not a military award.

And when the US administration says that Ukraine itself must decide what to do, there is no limit to the deceit: because the expired President Zelensky is the person who least of all wants the war to end, he knows that as soon as the war ends, he will cease to be president, and US special forces will evacuate him from Ukraine, just as Russia evacuated Assad.

Russia doesn't even need to conduct reconnaissance - all Ukrainian bunkers were built in the USSR, there is complete documentation with coordinates for everything. It would have been possible to remove the entire top of the state long ago. Or you can think about the bridges across the Dnieper. There are only 17 of them. And they were also all built in the USSR. Remove 17 bridges - and Ukraine will be cut in half by a river, 500 to 1500 meters wide. And there will be no more shells at the front, no more missiles. Because there are no more military airfields on the eastern side, and you can't transport so much by ferry. You can also think about the tunnels, also built in the USSR - they go through the Carpathian Mountains on the border with the EU. There are only 7 of them. Do you understand what I mean? Russia is still complacent. All the bridges and tunnels are in place, in working order. Bunkers too. For now. Why? Because it is an excellent lever for negotiations: if we will not get agreement, then this, this and this will happen. And after "This and this" all the weapons that NATO wants to pump into Ukraine will remain in Polish warehouses. Because there will be no railways or roads to deliver these weapons to the front.

You think? It's good. It's bad that you try on "what would have happened to me in his place?"

Correct. The SBU has taken responsibility. This is not the first terrorist act they have committed. A general is a legitimate target in a war. But when they blew up a cafe in St. Petersburg and 40 people died, or blew up cars with civilians - these are war crimes. I have no doubt that Russia will answer. Last time, the headquarters of the SBU was destroyed by a hypersonic missile for the explosion in the cafe, about 100 officers of SBU died in 1 min. This time, they can knock on some bunker with an Oreshnik - there is no escape from an Oreshnik: there are no means of interception, and even a 500 kg blank head instead of a warhead at a speed of 10 Machs causes an impact like almost a ton of TNT. Each missile has 6-12 warheads.

Nope, dear. Jan 20 is the border. Responsibility for everything before, lays on Joe and dems.

Navalny is a common swindler and crook. He has been convicted multiple times for embezzlement and fraud. The European Court of Human Rights has considered every criminal case brought by the Russian Federation against Navalny. The very first case was brought in the Russian Federation on the fact of theft of timber and money in 2007. The ECHR decision can be read here https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161060 The case is NOT recognized as politically motivated.

Oh, yeah, Putin personally came to this colony... I doubt what Putin even remember name of Navalny

alignment btw despotic monarchy, bloody "democracy" and world's gendarme

Sure, they have border. But it isn't about influence - it is about mutual interests: both sides want to exterminate or push out Kurds.

They fled from ISIS, and the peak of fleeing was at the summer 2015 - more than 2 millions. After Russian intervention to conflict at October 2015 within next few months flow more than halved and to summer 2016 almost stopped, then both - Russia and US announced ISIS defeated in Syria. I suppose there were some deals btw current movement and Russian security services in advance, because at days when some embassies were closed in Damask and Iranian embassy was destroyed, Russian embassy worked as usual without any problems. Therefore operation of the evacuation Assad was prepared in advance and was done without problems. Is this what your media is telling you? Well then you will have the opportunity to tell it to these people who will be hanged on poles in Damascus by the rebels, as they have already announced... Why do you trust your media so blindly? The leading force in this rebel movement is Al-Qaeda, which carried out 9/11, and now you are talking positively about how it has taken over Syria and about "democracy". All that awaits Syria is Sharia law, burqas on women and religious control of all aspects of Syrian life. It is simply amazing how much the media has brainwashed you in an attempt to pass off what is happening as a Biden victory. But in fact, the last secular state in the region has fallen. Moreover, Al Qaeda will now be legalized as the government of Syria, but will also have at its disposal the resources of an entire country rich in oil and gas.

You shouldn't joke about the Tsar - the mother of the last Tsar of Russia was a Danish princess, and her sister was the wife of the British King Edward IIV and the mother of George V Almost all the royal houses of Europe are related... First cousins Nikolay II and George V

They didn't it at past, not doing it now and will not do it in the future, and you know it. Each group of bandits/rebels/insurgents/revolutionists there (name it as you want) has behind one or even few foreign secret service or party. Because of 2 words: gas and oil.

But you aren't "old enough" to see what will be with Syria under radical Islamists and to think "maybe Assad wasn't so evil compared to these" Some facts, known by AI, about guys who took Damask:

Well, then it is British propaganda, exactly that I meant when pointed you to The Sun

This fact fist been published by British The Sun, since Chichvarkin is living in UK.

.......

Dear, future "government" is in UN list of designated terrorist groups... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_groups Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (you know them under the label Al-Quaeda), exactly they took Damask... if you dreaming about bright future of Syria, you should correct your dream at least in few points: it will be Shariah state with Shariah law, it will be theocratic state, there will be no democracy at all because to make election in Syria will be not possible due quite big set of different military groups acting in interests of different countries, ISIS will get strength again because of unrest and because there are no Assad's army anymore to suppress them, with very high probability there will be civil war, maybe for few years, maybe nonstop and endless, few "governments"... like in Libya now - one sits in UN but controls only capital, other are real local govts... whatever you think about the Assad regime, it was the last civilian/secular regime in the region, and it fell, now the mullahs will be in charge and regarding the Russian army: it is better for the West that it stays there, because if the Russian troops leave Syria, in a week they will be on the Ukrainian front, where Ukraine is already in a very bad situation... so, if you want to have picture about future of Syria - just take a look on Afghanistan and Taliban - if Al-Quaeda will have enough power in Syria, or on Libya, if it will have not enough power to control whole country.

The same as with Snowden: to ignore.