Moses

That's nice. You have nothing to say about paradox situation when US should choose btw Clown and Zombie to which gerontocracy pushed country, and switching discussion to KGB. Well, I knew - there is nothing right and acceptable in choice one of 2 "worst cases"

I just wonder: why US should choose btw 2 worst "cases" - Orange Clown and Walking Dead Alzheimer?

Could you please quote me where I'm talking about "respect"?

Why you call country of gerontocrats "democracy"? Without cards with speech Biden is able to say only 3 sentences: "Who I am?" "Where I am?" and "Who are you?".

You will destroy your country even more if current Mr. Alzheimer Mr. President, will take oval room again. And now I'm talking not about Trump.

Don't tell me what I should do, and will not tell you to where you should proceed with all your wishes... Please find in my posts any "normalizing" of Trump. I'm speaking about titles for presidents. What is correct and what is not.

It is not about Trump, it is about respect of the will of nation elected him as a president. It is foundation of democracy, do you know?

No. "President Trump" is correct because of lifetime presidential privilege. Moderator may use both: "Mr. Trump" and "President Trump". "Mr. President" isn't correct since it is privilege of acting president.

It isn't correct. "Once President = forever President" - it is presidential privilege. So "President Trump" is correct. Does First amendment still exist in US? If so, why so many words about appearance of candidate to take POTUS's chair on TV?

There are some more tricks for to save money when you are booking via internet: don't use iPhone and Apple computers, don't use Chrome browser, use VPN from less developed country and may additionally save up to 30%. For example: just two different browsers: Opera and Chrome.

What we reading here: - ethnic rebel group - Karen National Liberation Army - attacked two military-backed Border Guard Force (BGF) strongholds - as result Intense violence displaced thousands of residents in Myanmar who took little to no belongings with them as they either boarded boats or waded through waist-deep water to cross the river into Thailand So question: Why here is mentioned "junta"? "Rebels" Karen National Liberation Army - radical nationalistic movement with terroristic methods existed since 1949 (hello UK, it is result of your ruling in Burma, KNLA has roots in formerly army officers of British Burma). KNLA attacks state army since 1949. With junta on the top of country or with civilian govt, KNLA attacks anyway.

The whole article looks like virus advertising of 79 Adult show.

So, who really "seem"?

Could you please point me on word "Putin" in my posts. "Putin" is in your head, but you trying to pretend what "You seem". In my posts I'm speaking about Myanmar.

I never wrote "let's turn history back to past". I wrote: it is time to UK to accept and declare own actions as mistakes and pay for it: firstly - with apologies and accepting responsibility, secondly - fix it by financial aid and by resolving problem. Burmese will never forget them (Rohingya) tens of thousands of killed Buddhists at past. In modern tensions even Nobel prize's for peace winner - Aung San Suu Kyi - took side of Myanmar govt in crisis. Because all Burmese remember history. Their own history.

Romans don't exists anymore, while UK sill exists, and the same family rules UK what created crisis during First Anglo-Burmese war. So, I think it will be right step for UK to accept responsibility for moving Rohingya to Arakan state in 19 сentury as a the first step, and resolve crisis in moving them back to Bengal state or to UK as a second step.

Lets not forget what "Rohingya crisis" has been created and then carefully cooked by British empire in First Anglo-Burmese War.

Do you want to discuss one-party-system in Laos or Vietnam? Or maybe absolute monarchies without any party like Brunei, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Vatican City, and the individual emirates composing the United Arab Emirates?

I just want to remind: people in disorders in Capitolium were named "terrorists" for much less actions, than do some Myanmar fractions...

this is even below $50.000 well, when party supports terror it shouldn't' be represented in legal organizations and parliament

Exactly that I told. By mandate ICC should be sponsored by members. But EC EU paid to ICC. That I call bribe.

Sure, he who pays the piper calls the tune. Anybody wants to discuss independence of ICC after it?

EU even doesn't hide this sponsorship https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_23_1786 "Check against delivery" - name of press-release on official site of EU. 10 millions are already paid "for Ukraine", 3 millions are promised. Meanwhile EU itself isn't member of Rome statute nor member of ICC. Uncovered bribe.

Bullshit. No one of them was in ICC court. No one. ICC is toothless. Miloshevich, Karadzich and Mladich - all of them were in UN tribunal. And to initiate tribunal may only UN Security Council. China, Russia has veto in UN SC. So you may continue to dream, but right now all these stories are dances of drunk British fairies - just a propaganda, because ICC has only one mutual with UN tribunal - he is also located in Hague. What do you think: why on the next day after arrest warrant issue UK transferred to ICC 1 million of euro?

Most funny part of that "news" isn't published: CNBC while published that "news" "forgot" to mention what US itself does not recognize rights of ICC and issues sanctions against prosecutors of ICC from time to time. By the way: Ukraine also not recognize ICC, as well as Russia. So question: who is cooker of that soup? And for whom is working that circus?