Moses

Why should we compare? Russia never played any role in the export of passenger aircrafts. Tell me please, why Airbus had no such problems in "deliberately" choosed period? If you want to compare Boeing, then you should talk about Airbus (red), where Airbus won more than twice. Why should I exclude 737MAX? It is pure and clear Boeing's fuckup. And grounding all planes of one of the Boeing's models shows risks which should take in account all buyers. Boeing is in crisis. It is visible without glasses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_between_Airbus_and_Boeing Dear, thank you for starting discussion about my personality. It is so valuable in thread about aircrafts.

Nope. This year is year of anti-drone systems in Russian sector. Russia is expert in such systems now. Even when Russia has there IL-76MD as I know, it is quite old model and mostly used there for to bring equipment to Dubai.

Have you read text by your own URL?

You forgot one word in your second sentence: "passenger". And "no one lining" by very easy understandable reason - in 2023 Russia does not offer any passenger aircraft in Dubai.

Well, you should compare yearly delivery for example of 737 "before" and "after" COVID then

I have no idea how it is related to Russian aircraft in this topic, but it is good news for Boeing, since it lost over 1000 aircraft orders at past 5 years, most of them were canceled due pandemic, but also there were cancelations due huge delays in delivery of ordered aircrafts. Just few days ago Ryanair complained again: At past 5 years Boeing got orders for 737MAX for almost 6000 planes, but was able to manufacture less than 1500. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Boeing_737_MAX_orders_and_deliveries

Well, maybe you should study subject before to discuss it? IL-96 is flying since the end of 1992. Aeroflot used it since 1992 till 2014. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilyushin_Il-96

Where do you see in my words what I'm flying by IL-96-400? I will post what I count relevant and don't need your advices, thank you.

I show first hand sources. For news about Japanese carbon I use Japanese source, for news about Russian aircraft I use Russian source. Everyone knows how to use translator from Google.

Nope. Il 96 400 M is just base and temporarily designated. It will be IL-496. They even already made Wiki page for it https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ил-496 By the way: I hate to fly on Il-96 - 4 engines make flight too noisy, even more noisy than flight on Boing 747, I hate it too.

Kostik is correct. It is wide spreaded misunderstanding because of translation. IL-96-400 is military/freight/firefighter/emergency service model with 4 engines. Passenger modifications are IL-96-300 with 4 engines and future IL-496 which will be based on IL-96-400 M but will have 2 engines.

IL-96-300 is Putin's aircraft. By the way: Japan makes carbon fibers for many aircraft manufacturers. Here is article (in Japanese, use Goggle translator). They declare Russian carbon wings for Russian MC-21 better than carbon wings of Boing 787 manufactured by Mitsubishi. https://jbpress.ismedia.jp/articles/-/46034

https://apnews.com/article/kentucky-governor-andy-beshear-reelection-political-divisions-fb8fdbe2c10e2097ef41fb1f232afcd3 Receipt of the victory: fighting for abortion rights + keeping distance from dirty politic of Mr. Alzheimer and Orange Clown.

Dems are strong. Dems have brand. That is not a question. Question is - Biden - weakest point in Dem's strategy. Dems need plan B, there is no warranty what Biden will be still in his weak mind to Nov'24 or even alive. By the way: governors who won elections, kept distance from Biden in their campaigns, that noted all political analyzers. Because Biden is weakest point in Dem's strategy.

The problem is what Israel and Palestine should be established at the same time based on the same UN decision. And Israel has been established and since first own day does everything for to suppress establishment of Palestine.

Looks like you haven't answer why Israel bombing Palestine and now trying to switch to Ukrainian conflict?

Read? Hahaha... First step is always deny.

Gasa is part of state of Palestine and that fact is recognized by 138 of 193 UN countries Just to compare: Taiwan is recognized by 12 countries only.

Nope. Because Japan is known as monoethnic country. So I'm correct.

Tell us dear, why started war Hamas, but Israel punishing Palestine? 70% of victims are kids and woman.

Sure. What else it may be? Do you have another name for to targeting civilians and wipe 2 cities by nuclear strike?

Iuppiter iratus ergo nefas You are the victim of the Western propaganda, "history is written by the winners".

Aha. So now we have: leaders who ordered to drop nuclear bombs are heroes leaders who threatened to drop nuclear bombs are "lunatics dictators" Is it correct?

Oh, dear... are you sure? "Nuking Gaza is an option, population should ‘go to Ireland or deserts’" just said Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu in interview to radio Kan (Israel) Eliyahu also voices his objection during the interview to allowing any humanitarian aid into Gaza, saying “we wouldn’t hand the Nazis humanitarian aid,” and charging that “there is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza.” He backs retaking the Strip’s territory and restoring the settlements there. Asked about the fate of the Palestinian population, he says: “They can go to Ireland or deserts, the monsters in Gaza should find a solution by themselves.” He says the northern Strip has no right to exist, adding that anyone waving a Palestinian or Hamas flag “shouldn’t continue living on the face of the earth.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/far-right-minister-nuking-gaza-is-an-option-population-should-go-to-ireland-or-deserts/

So, Israel should wait till death toll will be comparable to WW2 in the Pacific and then nuke Palestine?