July 12, 20206 yr ‘Begin Again’ Calls on James Baldwin to Make Sense of Today https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/books/review-begin-again-james-baldwin-eddie-glaude-jr.amp.html
July 13, 20206 yr Active Members An early 2019 article in GQ also looked back at Baldwin for perspective. Baldwin saw the handwriting on the wall and moved to France, as did the main character in Giovanni's Room, Baldwin's novel of an American's despair. I love the article's images of Baldwin's style.
July 13, 20206 yr Active Members II have mentioned before another student sophomore year in college was reading 'Another Country' because he was constantly propositioned, even with his parents, on vacation in Maine. He wasn't gay, but wanted to know what he was up against. To be fair, he had been a male models. I believe this was in the Fall of 1962 when conversations like this were a bit unusual. He lived with his parents in Brookline, Massachusetts.
July 14, 20206 yr Active Members Writing about it was unusual too. I assume that is why authors like Baldwin and Renault used such subtle references to same sex affairs of their characters.
July 14, 20206 yr Active Members 24 minutes ago, Pete1111 said: Writing about it was unusual too. I assume that is why authors like Baldwin and Renault used such subtle references to same sex affairs of their characters. I may be wrong, but never considered James Baldwin subtle.
July 14, 20206 yr Author 31 minutes ago, Buddy2 said: I may be wrong, but never considered James Baldwin subtle. I think he as most great writers was most subtle. At the same time as flaming across the sky as a comet. Like Hemingway, Faulkner, the 19th-century greats, on and on. All the way back to Gawain & Chaucer & before. For many reasons, reader-influencing etc etc etc
July 14, 20206 yr Active Members 1 hour ago, Buddy2 said: I may be wrong, but never considered James Baldwin Yet one can find people that disagree the characters in Giovanni's Room made love, or people that disagree Lysis and Alexias ever made love in Last of the Wine. Was a difficult task getting the point across back in the 50s and 60s, to get that published. Call it what you will. Clever, subtle, deft, and so on. Edited July 14, 20206 yr by Pete1111
July 19, 20206 yr Active Members On 7/13/2020 at 10:34 PM, AdamSmith said: I think he as most great writers was most subtle. At the same time as flaming across the sky as a comet. Like Hemingway, Faulkner, the 19th-century greats, on and on. All the way back to Gawain & Chaucer & before. For many reasons, reader-influencing etc etc etc I don't consider James Baldwin a great writer of fiction. Not even close.
July 20, 20206 yr Author 5 hours ago, Buddy2 said: I don't consider James Baldwin a great writer of fiction. Not even close. Why do you think that?
July 20, 20206 yr Author 2 hours ago, Buddy2 said: Who reads his fiction today? How many people read Spencer’s The Faerie Queene today? That seems a scant measure of the greatness of a body of work. Rather a marker of our own shortcomings, laziness, chosen ignorance.
July 20, 20206 yr Active Members 7 hours ago, AdamSmith said: How many people read Spencer’s The Faerie Queene today? That seems a scant measure of the greatness of a body of work. Rather a marker of our own shortcomings, laziness, chosen ignorance. I usually agree with your choices of writers, this is a rare exception.
July 20, 20206 yr Author 1 hour ago, Buddy2 said: I usually agree with your choices of writers, this is a rare exception. Still curious about your beef with Baldwin. His work seems to me more relevant now than ever.
July 20, 20206 yr Author People don’t read what they don’t want to hear. Especially when it speaks truth to power.
July 21, 20206 yr Active Members 16 hours ago, AdamSmith said: People don’t read what they don’t want to hear. Especially when it speaks truth to power. Ha ha ha ha I have been reading Baldwin all my life And I served in Vietnam in the military for a year in 1968 and 1969. I missed the 1968 Demoratic National Convention. However, When I reviewed Bobby Seale's case files in Philadelphia, he did briefly talked about his participation at that convention
July 22, 20206 yr Author 11 hours ago, Buddy2 said: Ha ha ha ha I have been reading Baldwin all my life And I served in Vietnam in the military for a year in 1968 and 1969. I missed the 1968 Demoratic National Convention. However, When I reviewed Bobby Seale's case files in Philadelphia, he did briefly talked about his participation at that convention Still curious to know why you don’t like Baldwin. How the Vietnam facts are relevant is a mystery.
July 22, 20206 yr Active Members 10 hours ago, AdamSmith said: Still curious to know why you don’t like Baldwin. How the Vietnam facts are relevant is a mystery. Then we are even because most of your posts are a mystery to me.
July 22, 20206 yr Active Members On 7/20/2020 at 7:29 PM, AdamSmith said: Still curious about your beef with Baldwin. His work seems to me more relevant now than ever. Once again, I am writing about James Baldwin's fiction, not his more politcal writing. Perhaps you greatly over valued Stanley Kubrick also. His films were relevant in the 60s and 70s.
July 23, 20206 yr Author 9 hours ago, Buddy2 said: Once again, I am writing about James Baldwin's fiction, not his more politcal writing. Perhaps you greatly over valued Stanley Kubrick also. His films were relevant in the 60s and 70s. Well, once again, we shall just have to agree to disagree.
July 24, 20206 yr Author On 7/22/2020 at 11:20 AM, Buddy2 said: Perhaps you greatly over valued Stanley Kubrick also. His films were relevant in the 60s and 70s. Musing on it, wonder why you think Kubrick's films were linked to a particular era. To me (as to great directors quoted in my posts elsewhere here), they were more like the timeless works of Homer, Dante, Chaucer, etc etc than to 'the '60s and 70s.'
July 24, 20206 yr Active Members Just now, AdamSmith said: Musing on it, wonder why you think Kubrick's films were linked to a particular era. To me (as to great directors quoted in my posts elsewhere here), they were more like the timeless works of Homer, Dante, Chaucer, etc etc than to 'the '60s and 70s.' You actually believe Stanley Kubrick's films are timeless. Few people believe: Alfred Hitchcock's or Spike Lee's films are timeless. Astonished
July 24, 20206 yr Author Seems you are just saying movies in general cannot be art at all. https://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/lists/17-rare-times-when-director-made-five-or-more-great-films-row Very odd POV.
July 24, 20206 yr Active Members 6 minutes ago, AdamSmith said: Seems you are just saying movies in general cannot be art at all. https://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/lists/17-rare-times-when-director-made-five-or-more-great-films-row Very odd POV. Of course not. "The Wizard of Oz" is timeless.
July 24, 20206 yr Author 7 minutes ago, Buddy2 said: Of course not. "The Wizard of Oz" is timeless. Is it art compared with the above and their like? We will soon be admiring Willy Wonka.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.