Big Brother on Line

[vinapu]

Last night I had a bit of political discussion on Line with friend, not a member here. Subject - Iran's nuclear ambitions and US attempts to prevent them possessing it. Short , civilized and uncontroversial although we did not agree on everything. At one point I voiced an opinion that possession of any type of arms  doesn't meant that in the conflict they will be used, citing example of poison gasses used  in WW I trenches but not used in battlefields of WW II . 

I had another two short message exchanges, with member about virtues of Jey Spa  personnel and joys of returning to the  hotel we both like, nothing drastic at all and another with boy in Phnom  Penh asking how is his mother to which response was ' still in hospital ".

This morning sent short  messages on Line to 3 different members and the said boy and all came with the same response " undelivered, your ability to send messages was temporarily  suspended owing to violation of our policy"

Certainly reason was not mother in hospital neither accolades  "Jey Spa never disappoints"  but has something with named arms and politics so you have been warned.

it looks that for time being I  can receive messages on Line but can't respond to them.

Hitler and Stalin are certainly spinning in their graves that they did not have such opportunities in their times .

  

[bkkmfj2648]

10 hours ago, vinapu said:

This morning sent short  messages on Line to 3 different members and the said boy and all came with the same response " undelivered, your ability to send messages was temporarily  suspended owing to violation of our policy"

And this is exactly why the Thai Massage Insider forums had to move over to Telegram - as they could not control what the membership might write in the LINE forum space about massage guys that might violate LINE's policy.

[PeterRS2]

11 hours ago, vinapu said:

Last night I had a bit of political discussion on Line with friend, not a member here. Subject - Iran's nuclear ambitions and US attempts to prevent them possessing it. Short , civilized and uncontroversial although we did not agree on everything. At one point I voiced an opinion that possession of any type of arms  doesn't meant that in the conflict they will be used, citing example of poison gasses used  in WW I trenches but not used in battlefields of WW II .

Iran's nuclear ambitions are surely in part a result of Israel having nuclear weapons. One balances the other. Exactly as India and Pakistan both openly have nuclear weapons. Although Pakistan has lost all of its wars/skirmishes with india, it has never resorted to its nuclear arsenal.

Of course israel will never confirm or deny it has such weapons. Anyone who believes they do not is in some cloud cuckoo land!

[vinapu]

It looks that for now I'm stuck, messages are coming and I can see them , but whatever I send in 15 seconds comes as  "  undelivered" , sample below.

Fuck Line and her entire family.