Lucky

I am still on hold at the library. I just can't wait to see if my opinions agree with Adam Smith's review.

Does Miranda need to be given his Miranda warnings? Or, do his tricks need to be given Miranda warnings? You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you when I fuck you. You have the right to a condom. If you cannot afford a condom, one, or more as needed, will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to engage in wild sex with my big fat Brazilian schlong? If the answer is no, prepare to be tied up and flogged before being forced to take said schlong.

Yawn. Here I was trying to get back to sleep, and came upon this thread, and promptly fell asl..........

Firefox. I have also cleared cache. But, sometimes it does keep me signed out, sometimes it doesn't.

If it can happen to me...

Just to reiterate, not that it is needed, but I like tomcal's pictures. We may differ from time to time, but I am glad he posts them for all of us to enjoy as we will.

Welcome to the forums!

And his wife, no doubt.

At the risk of being labeled anti-Semitic, I don't approve of this action by the Israelis. That's what they do, isn't it, try to smear the person they disagree with by calling him or her anti-Semitic? I think it's a shame that so much of our Congress has sold out to a foreign government.

Hey, tomchen, sorry no one welcomed you you on your first post. Hope you will continue to post!

Mine was Scottish.

I did save it, but that would not attach to the thread either. So I found it on another site. Now everyone will be disappointed that it didn't knock their socks off after all my hullabaloo!

I saw another pic of him in a tank top. He needs the gym-badly! Really skinny arms. And he has to compete with the Schwarzenegger boy. Google Schlossberg, you get the other, who is hotly muscular.

It does have one of those horribly long addresses. I downloaded it to my computer and tried to upload it as an attachment, but that didn't take. It's no big deal, I just thought it was an interesting picture: https://blu171.mail.live.com/Handlers/ImageProxy.mvc?bicild=&canary=QDnuzPLiGCyCzw3a7jF1VC1ncZe6xnUZE9gLIGC4HBA%3d0&url=http%3a%2f%2fih.constantcontact.com%2ffs076%2f1101796400300%2fimg%2f577.jpg

Boytoy wouldn't allow my image, so sorry, my post failed. It is a jpeg image, which I thought worked here.

Child rape in the Orthodox Jewish Communities in the New York area have sure been in the news, with suggestions that some have the D.A.'s office in Brooklyn in their pocket. When politics becomes a first issue in deciding whether to file a case, we are in big trouble.

Recently I finished a smashing book by R. J. Ellory, the famed author of the novel A Quiet Belief in Angels. This one is called A Dark and Broken Heart and is essentially about a man so corrupt, both legally and in his heart, that there seems to be no possibility of redemption for him. Nevertheless, as the father of four children, he hopes, if only for them, that he can one day reach redemption for his evil deeds. The novel is the story of his efforts, and it is indeed a dark story. In my work as an attorney, I dealt with many people who had done wrong and wanted to make it right. Yet society seemed to lay so many obstacles in their path. It was as if one bad act changed the nature of your life and society's definition of you, and determined the course of what would be made available to you both publicly and privately. You were now branded a criminal, and evading that title was a mind-numbing task. Too many found it easier to just accept the title and live that life. So, when Totally Oz says he doesn't want to focus on a person's past, I think I do know of where he speaks. And even if speaks not for himself, he raises an interesting point- that we won't let people leave their past behind. This happens in every day life, and it happens most publicly with politicians. There has been some improvement in my lifetime. In many parts of the county, divorce is no longer an automatic bar to public office.Just like gays have had to whittle away at opposition to their rights, so do those with a "past" have to whittle away at both society's bias as well as the bias of individuals who they want to hold important places in their lives. As gays, we can identify with them in many ways, until their past behavior reaches the tips of our own bias, and then we too draw the doors closed on them. I am not talking here of people with serious deviate behaviors, like killing, rape, and other offenses that hurt or even ruin others lives. I am talking about an otherwise "behaved" individual who has a background that makes it difficult for him to advance his life even though he or she has left that behavior behind and now attempts redemption in the eyes of his or her friends and family, and society as a whole. We get to face our own biases when voting for public office, but more often in our private lives when we decide whether or not a person's past bars him from participation in our own everyday lives.

Yes, of course you do. I am not sure if you are following the story closely. Much of the mayor's bad behavior has happened while he is in office-drug buying, crack smoking, drunken behavior, and general crudeness. What a person has done in his past is just one factor to be considered in determining his or her qualifications. Most of us here would find it hard to get elected to anything, including me.

How coincidental. I put a hold on it at the library today. Thanks for your review of the book.

Well, Obama told people one thing, and it wasn't true. Then he rolled out a program that was not ready. This program has his name all over it, you would think he'd get it right.

Huh? I merely asked the question that was flying around Toronto. Eat your curry, Oz. watch out for the MSG!

No, they should be mine.

Well, okay, so his name is not Kennedy, it's Schlossberg, of all things. But dang, if he don't remind me of his grandpa, the late President John F. Kennedy. Here's 20 year-old Patrick Schlossberg at his mom's swearing in as Ambassador to Japan:

Another Democrat Senator tries to undo parts of Obamacare: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/14/us/politics/senate-democrat-joe-manchin-takes-on-party-leaders.html?hp&_r=0

It is just starting to hit me that Dems are undercutting the president on Obamacare. After the GOP tried so hard to undo it after it became law, will the Dems actually help them out? http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2013/11/12/dianne-feinstein-joins-bill-to-change-affordable-care-act/ http://www.sfgate.com/news/politics/article/Clinton-Obama-should-honor-health-care-pledge-4977273.php