Lucky

For most of us, life is different than it was in 1776. The country has grown beyond anything the Founding Fathers could have imagined. Big government requires smart people to run it. And we do have big government, not just to smite the Tea Party, but because we have a big population. Do we want the finest people running it(in theory) or do we want to continually turn the job over to rank amateurs? There is waste in government. The Bush wars, the Bush tax cuts- they compounded what was a solvable problem. Let's cut defense spending, cut out waste across the government, reduce eligibility for social services based upon need. Let the rich pay a tax rate higher than the one their secretary pays. Those are my Tea Party goals, and I don't even like tea!

Final thoughts on this subject. We all get to post in essentially open forums, dividing some subjects by categories to make it easier to find a particular topic. Politics is one of those forums, and it does help one looking for those subjects to easily find what he wants to see. Yet, many of us think politics is important enough to put in the general discussion group, not only because we want the topic to get the most readership, but because politics is an essential form of gay life. Had we not engaged in some politics of our own, we might still be patronizing Mafia bars and hiding our faces when the place was raided. The idea that we can post anything within reasonable guidelines helps increase the flow of conversation here, that conversation, I believe, being the very life of the place. Why some just cannot fathom coming across a political topic makes me think of women jumping on a table and screeching when they see a mouse. We are grown ups, yet sometimes we act like grade schoolers. There is an endless supply of butt shots, reminding me of trips taken with grade school boys where the first thing we hit was the Playboy newsstand. It's a commentary on us that butts are more popular than politics. And don't think I don't like seeing the butt shots. I appreciate the work of those like EXPAT, zipperzone, lurkerspeaks, and others to bring us the best choices. But I do wade through a lot of stuff that I don't care to see. Guys who post videos and expect us to watch it without any idea of what it is or why I might like it are just lazy. Why not tell us what you have so we can decide if we want to watch? At least on a politics thread you can soon discern its topic and move on. You didn't have to open up a video link and start watching. In short, in a community forum such as this, with multiple people and multiple interests, we come across much that does not interest everyone. Why single out politics as something akin to a mouse or fingers on a chalkboard? It demeans the rest of us who might have developed the interest and care more about the world than where the next butt pic is coming from. (And again, don't get me wrong, I like butt shots.) So, let's keep the spirit of openness and not impose restrictions on political threads as though they are some kind of rare fish that wouldn't interest us hedonists.

You jest!

You can go back and forth on term limits. In my opinion, it leaves a bunch of amateurs making big decisions. The whole country is on the decline anyway thanks to George W. Bush. His tax cuts and two unwanted wars have devastated the economy. Beyond that, his Republican appointees plundered the treasury to the extent they could, sharing it with their fat cat friends. They deregulated any meaningful laws to keep the environment or honest business practices flowing. Bush put Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court to dismantle the Constitution. And they skillfully got Joe Blow to go along with it all in order to protect his right to bear a gun that he only uses when drunk.

A trip to China! How convenient. You can just bring your savings account and hand it right over to them, avoid the middleman!

Townsend, you hardly ever post any more here anyway, so let's be upfront about that. A change as suggested would barely affect you. Gcursor, given the stock market's reaction to the possible change, you could be right!

Term limits means that your legislators never learn the ropes or amass enough power to get anything done.

I am in favor of combining them and do not understand the opposition to it. But ultimately we will survive either choice.

Obama U.S. Attorney Nominee David Barlow Is Tea Party Senator's General Counsel WASHINGTON -- Presidents routinely choose party loyalists as their U.S. attorneys. But normally, they choose nominees from their own party. President Barack Obama dismayed fellow Democrats on Tuesday when he announced his pick to be the next U.S. attorney for Utah is David Barlow, currently the general counsel to freshman senator and Tea Party favorite Mike Lee (R-Utah). It's unclear whether Barlow shares Lee's more extreme legal theories about the limits of federal power. But what is known about Barlow is that he has no significant criminal law experience -- he was a corporate lawyer practicing pharmaceutical defense, toxic tort and product liability law before starting to work for Lee in January -- and he's a registered Republican who contributed $300 to Obama's opponent, Sen. John McCain, in 2008. Todd Taylor, executive director of the Utah Democratic Party, said his group sent the names of several strong, qualified Democratic candidates for the job to the White House, then never heard anything back. "We're just deeply disappointed" by the Barlow nomination, Taylor said, "and given the legal philosophy of Mike Lee, it leads us to wonder what this guy even thinks about the law." The liberal ThinkProgress blog suggested that "Lee's contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah's top federal attorney." All in all, Taylor said, the nomination "just raises a bunch of question about why." Huffington Post

"But I still say if you want to see a movie, the best experience is in the theatre on a big screen." Just don't forget the raincoat. The topic is porn, after all.

Don't believe him for a moment, gcursor. The rest of us had our Gold memberships delivered personally by naked Thai boys who did a candle dance on top of us when they presented the membership.

Yes, thanks for the report. And TY, what trip do you have planned? I love to live vicariously off of others' trips!

Stocks Plunge on Fears of Global Turmoil Investors Cite Slow U.S. Recovery and Europe’s Debt Crisis By GRAHAM BOWLEY 31 minutes ago American indexes fell around 5 percent as new data heightened fears that the United States may be headed toward a double-dip recession and that Europe’s debt crisis could widen. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/05/business/markets.html?_r=1&hp Is the Times getting its news from this forum these days? Look at this: News Analysis Time to Say It: Double Dip Recession May Be Happening By FLOYD NORRIS It has been three decades since the United States suffered a recession that followed on the heels of the previous one. But it could be happening again. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/05/business/economy/double-dip-recession-may-be-returning.html?hp

Flaws in your reasoning? Dude, this could devastate the male hooker industry! Let's assume that half of those 14 million out of work are women. That leaves 7 million men. Assume that 1% of them are gorgeous, then you have flooded the market with 70,000 new hustlers. How can the current escorts keep up their rates in the face of that competition? Prices would drop and even more people would be out of work!

Lookin, I wish I could agree with you, but I was better at politics in the eight grade than Obama is in the White House. You learn early that you don't start negotiating at the 50 yard line and work to the opposition side. You hopefully have some balls to take a position that you support and work from there, maybe meeting at the 45 yard line or closer to the 50th. Obama can give a great speech, but that is the extent of his political skill. Why else was Biden doing all the heavy work? Hillary would have had Boehner standing in the corner until he could play nicely.

Better hurry. The FAA may be back any minute.

Yes, perhaps some threads do need to be flagged! I was expecting to see a cute pic of a new puppy!

I am all in favor of changing the amendment to limit citizenship to babies of US citizens and not foreigners. This is so easily manipulated. And as for Muslims increasing in power in Europe, yes, I dread it. Why shouldn't a gay man be concerned that after years of winning his rights he now has yet another group of right wing fanatics and bigots to contend with? Beyond that, Muslims in government cannot let their church values stand to the side anymore than a Mormon or Pentecostal. They are all a danger to gay rights, and I don't mean to leave out the Catholics or those nutty Scientologists.

I don't see the opposition. We need to liven things up here, not by being timid and afraid of a post that might say something we don't like, but let's get some conversations going. If you have stopped posting here, don't handcuff the rest of us. Having a separate politics forum divides the community. Let's bring everyone together and make this the discussion forum. How about this? WHEREAS, the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party recognizes the challenge presented by President Obama's negotiating away Democratic Party principles to extremist Republicans, we are challenged by President Obama in the following ways: His unilateral closed-door budget offer to slash Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which endangers the New Deal and War on Poverty safety nets. His determination to escalate U.S. militarism through illegal secret CIA drone attacks and unauthorized wars. His willingness to extend the Bush tax cuts for millionaires and bail out big banks without ending the foreclosure crisis that displaces American working families . His insistence on pushing a health insurance bill which enriches private insurance companies while ignoring growing support for single-payer health care or robust public options. His continuance of President Bush’s assault on civil liberties with an extension of the repressive Patriot Act. His failure to restore due process, including the protection of whistleblowers and habeas corpus. His numerous failures to adhere to international law. The continuing practice of nationwide FBI raids of anti-war progressive protestors. His decision to increase the arrests and deportations of undocumented workers. His facilitation of the privatizing of the public sphere, which includes education and housing, among others. His disregard of his promises to the Labor movement. His failure to adequately protect the environment and adequately address climate change. WHEREAS, the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party recognizes the historical significance of the Eugene McCarthy/Robert F. Kennedy anti-war challenge to President Lyndon Johnson. The challenge followed President Johnson's decision to escalate U.S. military involvement in Vietnam, betraying his campaign promise to end a war that polarized America. Similarly, we recognize the danger and betrayal that the current "Grand Bargain" represents to the legacy of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's signature gift to all Americans, Social Security and the New Deal, a point of pride for all Democrats. WHEREAS, the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party is committed to the understanding that an interest in a 2012 Democratic presidential primary challenge will not interfere with President Obama's ability to govern and not limit his ability to do so in ways that include invoking Constitutional options, we recognize that this will, in fact, raise debate on important issues without risking the ability to mobilize and energize the base of the Democratic Party to elect a triumphant leader to counter the far-right agenda. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, to make our views heard, the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party will begin the process of contacting other Democratic organizations, Democratic Party members and public organizations that share our views on the issues and which seek to alter the course of history by exploring other steps to effect a necessary change, including a possible primary challenge to President Obama. Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=94646#ixzz1U1wTKiWZ

"I'd rather die before I reach the permanent frustration stage." When is that?

Could we have these video threads flagged?

Yes, no flags needed.

Gcursor has definitely hit on a hot topic. For me, size does not matter unless too small. By that I mean a guy whose cock is the size of his thumb. Yes, I have met one, Big cocks are easy on the eyes, but not always very practical!

So life becomes even more meaningful the moments at which death approaches? By then, you are kind of limited in what you can do...

gcursor, I was so shocked that a man of my history on the boards would still be expected to provide written materials on the proposed Senior Escort's Retirement Home. Tell you what, I may make you in charge of determining which cocks are too top heavy and need athletic support. A $50,000 donation by tomorrow could guarantee that slot!