unicorn

If I had a Ruble for every time Moses has lied on this forum, I'd be richer than Elon Musk. His silence is as close as you'll get to an admission of his BS. And, yes, he was obviously BS'ing. As for getting him to admit to his lies (even when caught red-handed, such as in this instance, and in many others), much less apologize, you're more likely to hear the lions outside of New York's public library roar.

Although it's the case that you don't have to answer a question posited by another poster while having a discussion, if you don't then you essentially concede to being a bullshitter. Not that this has ever bothered you. Reminds me of Kash Patel's bullshitting to Congress:

One of my first movie memories after I hit puberty was when my father took me out to see 3 Days of the Condor. I remember how warm he made me feel when I watched him onscreen...

Yikes. No wonder Tyler Robinson is such a fuck-up. To make matters even worse, they're now saying he was dating a trans woman. He played right into MAGA's hands. I wonder why he didn't just shoot himself after he did it. Did this doofus think he was going to get away with it? How did he think it was going to play out?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/23/protests-as-newborn-removed-from-greenlandic-mother-after-parenting-competence-tests "A Greenlandic mother’s one-hour-old baby was removed from her by Danish authorities after she underwent “parenting competence” tests – despite a new law banning the use of the controversial psychometric assessments on people with Greenlandic backgrounds. Ivana Nikoline Brønlund, who was born in Nuuk to Greenlandic parents and has played for the Greenlandic handball team, gave birth to her daughter, Aviaja-Luuna, on 11 August in a hospital in Hvidovre, near Copenhagen, where she lives with her family. An hour later, the local municipality took the infant into foster care. Brønlund, 18, says she has since only seen her daughter once, for an hour, when she was not allowed to comfort the baby or change her nappy. The “parenting competence” tests, known as FKU (forældrekompetenceundersøgelse), were banned on people with Greenlandic backgrounds earlier this year after years of criticism by campaigners and human rights bodies, who argued successfully that the tests were racist because they were culturally unsuitable for people from Inuit backgrounds. As the law came into force in May, campaigners are asking why Brønlund was still subjected to a test...Brønlund was told that her baby was removed because of the trauma she had suffered at the hands of her adoptive father, who is in prison for sexually abusing her. The municipality told her she was “not Greenlandic enough” for the new law banning the tests to apply, despite her being born in Greenland of Greenlandic parents...". Do you think mothers should be subjected to "parental competency tests" in order to keep their children? And should mothers be punished because their fathers raped them? It seems like quite an over-reach to me.

According to that article, the actual source of the damage is still under investigation: " " At this point, I can't definitively say what fell on the house in Wyryki. It's under investigation, and we're waiting for expert opinions, " says prosecutor Agnieszka Kępka, spokeswoman for the District Prosecutor's Office in Lublin, whose military department is investigating the massive drone strike in Poland. A special expert, an expert in military weapons, will issue the opinion." " What we were dealing with was a very precisely planned operation at the tripoint of the borders of Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus. It was intended to test our reaction and capabilities, but also to cause confusion. It was intended to do no harm, to destroy, so as not to trigger NATO's Article 5. Besides, I was observing what was happening in the Russian media at the same time. This clearly confirmed that Russia was behind it – Korovai has no illusions." Regardless, whether the damage to the house was caused by the Russian drone itself, or by a missile fired to intercept the drone, Russia is still ultimately responsible, of course. There would have been no need to fire the missile if the dummy drone hadn't been sent in the first place.

Cut the BS. You know perfectly well that the vast majority of Russia's wealth comes from what they dig out of the ground. Here are the 2020 data: Here's the most recent data I found: https://www.tradeimex.in/blogs/russia-top-10-exports Export Products Export Value ($) Export Share (%) Mineral fuels and oils $254.7 billion 63.8% Precious stones and metals $20.6 billion 5.2% Iron and Steel $15 billion 3.8% Fertilizers $14.9 billion 3.7% Cereals $11.3 billion 2.8% Aluminum $8.3 billion 2.1% Fish $6.2 billion 1.5% Copper $6 billion 1.5% Animal/vegetable fats & oils $5.6 billion 1.4% Ores, slag, and ash $5.2 billion 1.3% At least you're contributing to the 3.7%--you're exporting a lot of bullshit!

From younger days:

Who could resist this? (Not a gay man, that's for sure)

He plays a rich Texas rancher...

The star of the movie The Wrong Paris, Pierson Fodé, is a perfect 10! Jesus Christ, I could not believe what I was seeing. It should be illegal for him to put on a shirt... 😍

Unclear why Trump is fixated on crude oil, rather than on liquid natural gas. For whatever reason, Trump has demanded NATO members cut off oil, not gas. Of course, Russia never manufactures anything anyone would want. Their wealth comes purely from whatever they can dig up out of the ground.

Most analysts are now saying this was probably a test of NATO preparedness/resolve. They also seem to feel it's unlikely NATO/EU members will stop buying Russian oil, at least for now (Turkey, Hungary, Slovakia). If true, that would certainly explain why the drones were unarmed. Keeping the drones unarmed lowered the risk of the gamble, since this made a more forceful response far less likely. Still--this was a high-stakes gamble. https://www.rferl.org/a/nato-russia-oil-trump-demands-ukraine-war/33531073.html "...Only three NATO nations currently import Russian crude: Hungary, Slovakia, and Turkey. Of the three, Turkey is the big one...".

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/george-retes-ice-detained-us-citizen/684152/ "George Retes is a 25-year-old U.S. Army veteran who served a tour in Iraq. On July 10, while on his way to work as a security guard at a Southern California cannabis farm, he was detained by federal immigration agents, despite telling them that he is an American citizen and that his wallet and identification were in his nearby car, Retes told me. While arresting him, the agents knelt on his back and his neck, he said, making it difficult for him to breathe. Held in a jail cell for three days and nights, he was not allowed to make a phone call, see an attorney, appear before a judge, or take a shower to wash off pepper spray and tear gas that the agents had used, according to the Institute for Justice, a public-interest law firm that is representing Retes. He worried about his two young children and missed his daughter’s birthday....".

Where do you think that murderer learned his warped values?

Interesting video discussing relative safe areas to ride out any WW-3. People are already speculating! Some analysts in today's Los Angeles Times thought that perhaps this was intentional, with Putin testing NATO's resolve. Trump tends to be belligerent and unpredictable. Who knows what he'll do? I suspect Putin thinks he can control Trump, but that will prove more difficult with dementia creeping in. While I'd love to live in Chile, unfortunately the US is not a Mercosur country, so no such option. I suppose that as a US citizen, the Republic of Palau or American Samoa should be pretty safe.

This forum's liar-in-chief is at it again. Obviously, no one's going to go through a 2-hour video of the security council meeting, and he knows that. We don't have to, however, since we all know that the security council has 15 members, not 193. If one simply asks google what happened at the meeting, one gets the obvious answer: there was no vote (since, as a veto-wielding member of the security council, a vote condemning Russia was clearly impossible). And Moses is caught lying again, once again pulling up links which don't back up his claims at all: AI Overview While the UN Security Council held an emergency meeting on September 12, 2025, to discuss a recent incursion of Russian drones into Polish airspace, no binding vote or resolution was passed . The meeting was a venue for Poland and its allies to condemn Russia's actions and for Russia to deny responsibility, but it did not result in formal UN action. The incident and the UN meeting Drone incursion: On the night of September 9–10, 2025, 19 Russian drones violated Polish airspace during an attack on Ukraine. NATO fighter jets scrambled and shot down some of the drones, marking the first time a NATO member directly engaged Russian aircraft over its own territory during the conflict. Poland's reaction: Poland requested an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, describing the incident as an "unprecedented" violation of its territorial integrity and a major escalation by Russia. Polish officials called it a "large-scale provocation" and said the incident brought the region closer to open conflict than at any time since World War II. The UN meeting: During the emergency session, Poland and its allies, including the United States, condemned Russia's actions. The US acting ambassador reaffirmed America's commitment to defending NATO allies. Russia, however, denied deliberately targeting Poland and dismissed the accusations as baseless. Lack of a vote: Due to Russia's veto power as a permanent member of the Security Council, a binding resolution condemning its actions was not feasible. Therefore, the meeting was a forum for debate and condemnation rather than a voting session.

Try rentmen.eu