unicorn

I've never quite understood why the other place keeps having such heavy traffic compared to this site. I'm pretty sure it's just because they started first. No denying that any photos I post will get a lot more views in the other place, but I've gotten tired of dealing with their unpredictable moderators. I once posted a photo in which a woman's vulva was apparent. There was nothing in their posting guidelines that mentioned anything about this not being allowed. Indeed, they allowed non-erect penises to be shown (and still do). If they don't want photos of female genitalia, they could have just let me know by a private message (and, hopefully, added that to their guidelines). Instead, they banned me for a month. I had been a prolific contributor, and also sent them money a few times, so they lost a good contributor. Then they go around begging and wondering why no one wants to send them money? The photo area here is much easier to deal with, and you don't have to click links to see racier photos.

I would prefer that people don't put derogatory labels on a person's individual preferences when it comes to sexual attraction. A person for whom tattoos are a turn-off isn't a "hater" any more than a person who isn't sexually attracted to most members of a particular race is "racist." While Justin Bieber was never really my type to begin with, my personal opinion is that his tattoos totally ruined a perfectly decent body. I suspect that a large number of people agree with me. I also suspect that no one truly knows why he did that, perhaps not even himself. Maybe this may be a way of his rejecting a perception of his being a sex object. Maybe he wants to feel as if people will love him for being himself rather than for his body. Who knows. I'm not sure I would have ever hired him had he been an escort, although I might have in a city with few choices, without the tattoos. But covering his body with tattoos is a real boner-killer for me. No apologies: that's just the way it is. Now a small tasteful tattoo isn't a problem for me. A Canadian Justin I'd much rather fuck would be Justin Trudeau. I'd pay good money for this:

I saw the movie via Netflix. On the DVD's they send, closed captioning is not available, and I couldn't understand much of what the characters were saying. The movie's producers should have known that a majority of the movie's audience would have trouble understanding the dialog, so I don't understand why they skimped out on providing the subtitles. Even people from southern England have trouble understanding people from northern England.

You guys still getting a lot of snow in the Northeast?

Another early 90s stud who gave me wet dreams, and I wonder what became of him... http://www.tmz.com/2011/04/24/right-kind-of-love-singer-jeremy-jordan-memba-him/

I'll pay $$$! I feel a song coming on... I'll take good care of you, Joey!

“There's a difference between, you know, patting someone on the butt and rape or child molestation, right?" Damon said in a new interview with ABC News' Peter Travers. This seems like a very accurate statement. People disagree with that?

Come on. It's pretty obvious that if you're looking for an active discussion, one goes to the place with more people in the first place. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy, or positive feedback loop. In addition, many people find out about that site because of all of their reviews. Many escorts themselves refer to that site in their own websites or on rentmen. To compete, this place would have to somehow be able to inform others of this place. Unclear how it can do that. I did mention once over there that I stopped posting pictures there and started posting them here, but it's not like I can keep making postings there saying "Boytoy is a better forum" without incurring the wrath of the administrator. Yes'm. Whatever you say.

As has been stated multiple times before, people go there, as I do, because there are more responses likely to any posting or question. It's simply a more active site. Bigger is not necessarily better, but sometimes people just go where the volume is. BlueRay wasn't better than HD-DVR, but it won out because of volume.

Amusingly, I glanced through a string in the other forum entitled "Do you forgive and forget or hold a grudge?". In it, Guy Fawkes, who I'm assuming is the man who runs the site, writes, literally, "I forgive and forget; it's not worth holding on to the negativity." This from the man who's apparently banned a number of posters permanently.

Well, I don't know how considerable your considerable assets are, but if you have $1 million to invest (or even $500,000 in certain instances), there is the EB-5 visa program which will give a green card to those investing in businesses which will employ at least 10 American workers... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EB-5_visa

The only "advantage" of the other site I've heard, other than traffic, so far, is that they allow posts to be altered indefinitely, and this site limits the time one can alter one's posts (I thought it was an hour, but someone else said 30 minutes). If that's an advantage, it seems to be a pretty minor one. One could also argue that limiting the amount of time one can alter's one's posts keeps things more honest. Clearly, the major difference is that of traffic/participation. Paranoia can definitely reach insanity, however. No sane person would ever confuse a photo of a model who happened to have a fully clothed toddler son in the background as kiddie porn. If I were playing the $100,000 Pyramid, I would not list that action if the category were "Things sane people do." The photo was from the model's own Facebook page, for Christ's sake. Another time he banned me for a month because I posted a picture of an FTM man which showed the man's vulva (not open or anything). He allows pictures of penises and has NO rules against posting pictures of vulvas. I don't know the reason for such a rule, which he obviously has in his head. However, instead of politely saying "I know that this is not in the list of rules I have at the top of this forum, but in the future would you mind not posting photos including female genitalia?" he chose to ban me for a non-existent rule, without so much as a notice. This is not just extremely rude (especially to a fruitful contributor), but quite insane as well, as I see it. The only one with cause to be "paranoid" is the hapless contributor who never knows what's going to set him off. But this "paranoia" would be based on real facts and past behaviors, rather than on unfounded imagination. Whenever I'm over there, I feel I'm walking on eggshells, and never know what's going to set him off.

Oh, I don't at all discard participation as an advantage. It's obviously a massive advantage, and probably the only reason the site is still around and as successful as it is.