MsGuy

LOL, or you could just wait for the Like clock to roll over.

Damn near every thing except water and proteins are broken down to sugars at some point in the process. Even proteins can be converted in a pinch but that process is much less energy efficient. Carbohydrates like starch are mostly long chains of simple sugars. '(Fibers' are extra long carb chains difficult for the digestive process to break down.) The problem with sugars in food is that they are absorbed so easily that they can cause a spike in blood glucose. Carbs are broken down over a period of hours, resulting in a much more level blood glucose level. A calorie is just a measure of energy.

RA1 discovers his house suddenly elevated to an even safer height. "Oh hi, Granny Jones..." "When did you get your pilot's licence?"

WHOA!! Is this thread a subtle hint at the destination of your safari to the ass end of the internet? Oz spotted quaffing a cool beverage somewhere outside Havana. Cautious cabana boys hover off camera, just out of reach. (Once bitten, twice shy. )

Said by the guy who posts a drawing of a 4 year old boy's blue painted ass hanging out of his jammies.

LOL, less misleadingly stated, they aren't photographed with their dicks hanging out.

I pretty sure either of those first two could talk me into bunny suit jammies, if that's what he wanted.

Apparently the prudes at YouTube have banned the Emblem3 video posted by Expat. Which only make me all the more anxious to see it. Does anyone have an alternate link?

Justin Beiber contracts Ebola. http://dailycurrant.com/2014/08/14/justin-bieber-hospitalized-with-ebola-2/

A like on post #16 on the Best Cocksucking Photo Contest thread would be nice, Dear Hito. Help a friend out, sweetheart. (You can close your eyes while you click if you want. It's all good.)

Guys, Oz has posted that he is currently paying his Indian programming slaves a small fortune to lift the "10 like barrier." Sez the issue is so deeply buried in the software that any infelicity in attempting a fix will blow up the site. Personally, I believe him. No one would make so preposterous a claim unless it were true.

Finally, someone who believes me! Use it as often as you like, Prawnboy. I'll even waive any copyright claims in your favor.

LOL, AS only you would find a poop joke in my innocent post.

A classic case of revealing too much. I gotta do a better job of self censoring while posting.

Now that's the AdamSmith we all know and love!!! If there's a edible nugget of chocolate mousse in that tar baby after all, you can bet the farm AS will find it!

OK, that seems like a fair characterization. I can go with that.

BTW. I'm still not quite convinced there's no literary or theatrical word (rhetorical I concede) for juxtaposing two characters who envy and pretend to each others strengths. Seems like there ought to be, even if there's not. ==== Hey, what about juxtaposition? Not quite right, maybe, but we're getting close, I think.

But AS, that's the whole point! It was just a dumb-ass, silly post that you took up and ran with. Took as a challenge to your intellectual prowess. What else was I to do except play along? ==== Hmm...who knew 'prowess' was spelled w/o a 'n'? Been saying it wrong my whole life, I guess.

My take away from that is that you should take more care in your selection selection of mentors.

OK, without further ado, the word is trolling. And believe me, I have learned my lesson from all this. Kiddies, take my word for it, even the most (seemingly) harmless bit of trolling can get wholly out of hand fast, without anyone really intending it to do so. Trolling is like crack or crystal meth. You try a shot or two just for fun and soon enough you find yourself all wrinkled up and toothless, posting nasty shit at your friends at 4:00 am in the morning. Thank God that AS swatted me down when he did or I'd probably still be in that hell.

Hey, I very plainly stated that I was worried that giving you the answer would piss you off even more than withholding it. Well, maybe dangling it in front of your nose and then jerking it away, but still I did warn so don't go all Rambo on my ass. PLEASE?

Third: To cut all this short, I wasn't asking a question, I was posing a riddle. And with riddles typically you are required to look a little sideways at the words and maybe squint your eyes a bit. What if I wasn't asking the word for the form of my post but a word for the interjection of a (mildly) inflammatory post into the middle of a tiff between two other posters, which tiff seemed to quieting down all on it's own? ==== OK the site software is telling me there are two posts waiting to be read, so I'm going to check them out before winding up. In the meantime, feel free to make your best guess while you're waiting.

Thank you, AS. I appreciation your support and encouragement.

Second: Consider query in context. Toward the tail end (yes,yes, bow wow, I get it, RA1) of a bit of tit for tat in the forums between AS and Draker I posted, "If AS is clever but wishes he were pretty and Draker is pretty but wishes he were clever...what's the word for that?" Now if one ignores the context and takes me to be asking a straight up question about identifying a literary device (or, worse yet, 'rhetorical figuration' (whatever that may be)), one is immediately lost in the bowels of the tar baby. But then why would anyone expect a straight question from the likes of me? {Grand Reveal Finale up next.}

LOL, give me a break, RA1. I'm working really hard here in the hope I might regain at least a faint semblance of dignity after that fierce beat down AS administered.