Goober

I hope the rumors about Jr two-timing Kimberly Gargoyle are true. Couldn't happen at a better time: right before the election. He kicks the b*tch to the curb, and then she spills all the sh*t on the trumps.

I wonder how much Melania paid the gunman? Just like Donnie, she was probably too cheap to hire a professional.

Not many people know that trump played Aunt Clara on Bewitched in the 1960s.

He had no idea why he was there. He thought it was a celebration of something and there'd be cake.

My apologies. Even though you failed to credit the source of your post (quite odd given your vast experience in public debate), I should have known it wasn't an original thought of yours. Evidently, you failed to cite ChatGPT when you decided to compare King Charles III to Putin. Here's what ChatGPT states about the comparison: Role and Power: King Charles III: As the King of the United Kingdom, Charles III holds a ceremonial and symbolic position with limited political power. His role is largely to represent the nation, perform ceremonial duties, and support various charitable causes. Vladimir Putin: As the President of Russia, Putin wields significant executive power. He has been a central figure in shaping Russian domestic and foreign policies and has been influential in global geopolitics. Governance: King Charles III: The UK is a constitutional monarchy, meaning Charles III's powers are largely symbolic, with real political power resting with elected officials in Parliament. Vladimir Putin: Putin has been in power in various capacities since 1999, either as President or Prime Minister. His governance style has been characterized by strong central control, and he has been criticized for undermining democratic institutions and human rights. Controversies: King Charles III: His controversies have been more related to personal matters, such as past relationships or environmental advocacy. However, these have not involved major political or legal disputes. Vladimir Putin: Putin has faced numerous allegations, including corruption, suppression of political opposition, censorship, and involvement in international conflicts, such as the annexation of Crimea and the conflict in Ukraine. Public Perception: King Charles III: Generally viewed as a figurehead with limited direct impact on policy. Public perception varies based on his personal actions and public engagements. Vladimir Putin: Public perception is highly polarized. In Russia, he has significant support among certain segments of the population, while internationally, he is often criticized for his authoritarian practices and international policies. In summary, King Charles III and Vladimir Putin operate in very different capacities with different levels of influence and types of controversies surrounding them.

You forgot to include the fact that as the British monarch, King Charles III has the special privilege to drive in his country without having a driver's license. So, in the supposed opinion of a poser, that equates to Putin's unfettered ability to order the murder of his opponents.

Equating the authority given to King Charles III to that of Putin is a whole new level of stupidity.

If it was posted three times to elicit a response from a poser, it obviously worked.

One of the forum's favorite posers, oops, I meant posters, wants us to believe that Putin is unaware of the state-owned media activities. https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/russians-mock-us-election-allegations-putin-teasingly-supports-113426858 "On Wednesday, the U.S. Justice Department said the Russian state-owned broadcaster RT is carrying out a covert campaign to influence the American public ahead of the election. Two state media employees were charged, and 10 people and two entities were sanctioned, with Kremlin-run websites seized."

When a poser tries to make funny.

That's a really stupid and ignorant conclusion. DJT stock has been on a downslide for months.

AND THIS: Air-conducting our National Anthem: AND THIS: A sexual predator humping the American flag: AND THIS: His 2018/2019 government shutdown that he said he'd take the blame for and then immediately blamed Nancy Pelosi for it: https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/26/politics/government-unpaid-workers-shutdown/index.html AND THIS: He doesn't like soldiers that get captured (it's not much of a jump to believe the reporting that he called our service men and women "suckers and losers" to be true}: Maybe one of our MAGAt forum members could post a link (that he didn't use for self-promotion) of trump actually honoring our military??? EmmetK, are you still around?

It would appear that the old, sometimes confused candidate with the stagnant base, Joe Biden, was actually replaced by another old, often confused candidate with a stagnant base, DonOLD Trump.

I don't think VonShitzInPantz thinks or acts rationally. As he's backed into a corner, he becomes more and more desperate, and will do anything he can, regardless of how irrational it is, legal or illegal, to survive. His survival depends on his winning the election by any means necessary. If, in his deranged brain, he thinks JD is dragging him down, he'll get rid of him one way or another.

That may be true, but if VonShitzInPantz continues to flounder in the polls, he's not going to admit to himself or the MAGAts that he's the problem. So, his problem must be JD. We'll see if he begins to audition potential replacements at his rallies, or, if JD suddenly develops some mysterious health condition. Considering VonShitzInPantz's previous attempt to get rid of Mike Pence, JD should take the danger to himself and his family very seriously.

I doubt VonShitzInPantz will publicly let Vance go. That might show his base just how unhinged he is. But I can imagine Vance being privately pressured to remove himself from the ticket, and then him citing some mysterious health reason or some other personal reason to step away. I don't know who would take his place. Maybe RFK Jr, but I can't see him being much of an asset to the ticket. Maybe a cis non-trans woman (I guess that disqualifies MTG). Maybe Stefanik?

Well, in trump's defense, it's reported that he really loves Ivanka's luscious and humongous tatas. And he personally knows for sure they're real. A father's love. It's really quite touching.

Tim Walz publicly proclaimed his love for his children at the DNC; something the trump children have longed to hear from their father for their entire lives.

Why blame the media? Dems have had plenty of opportunities to ask "Where's Melania?". If Biden had actually been present for THE DEBATE a few weeks ago, he could have asked how much Melania charges to be seen in public with her husband. Then, if Melania began to campaign with VonShitzInPantz, it would be a perfectly normal thing to question whether or not her presence was paid for.

I feel a bit sorry for JD. If VonShitzInPantz loses, he's going to blame his loss on JD. If VonShitzInPantz wins, at some point soon after VonShitzInPantz takes office, JD is going to have to invoke the 25th Amendment, riling up the MAGA cult.

Given EmmetK only cares about rally crowd sizes and polling numbers, with the Harris/Walz team's soaring crowd sizes and polling numbers while the trump/vance team continues to stagnate, our forum clown has probably been busy registering as a Democrat.

Kamala, Pete, or pretty much any of the Democratics mentioned as contenders would probably be qualified to be president. But I don't think now is a good time to be politically correct. The objective should be: Who has the best chance to beat Von ShitzInPantz. I think they should go with a centrist Democrat, middle-aged white guy with mass appeal; someone like Mark Kelly (a real astronaut, not a trump-pretend one).

Mark Kelly 2024

Von ShitzInPantz has proof the elections are rigged. It's reported that he claims Joan Rivers voted for him in 2016, even though she died in 2014. The DOJ should investigate.