Members Riobard Posted August 12 Members Posted August 12 Chamber of Deputies votes tomorrow whether to throw in with the Senate to revoke recent visa reinstatement. Tentative opinion is that the proposition will pass. Quote
floridarob Posted August 12 Posted August 12 Source? Despite the committee’s approval, PDL 206/2023 is not yet on the plenary agenda for full-house consideration. The scheduled plenary sessions on August 13 are focused on commemorative tributes, not legislative action. Quote
Members Riobard Posted August 13 Author Members Posted August 13 Difficult to assess merit of ignored florid bot content. May be breakthrough sanity, nevertheless of little worth. Bot unlikely capable of influencing ignore preferences. Ignore is default for need to snooze malfunctioning bot pending repair. Recycle rinse repeat. 🤷🏼 Quote
floridarob Posted August 13 Posted August 13 Your grand procession has arrived at the gates of nowhere, as usual 🤷♂️ Quote
hornyfrog Posted August 13 Posted August 13 23 hours ago, Riobard said: Chamber of Deputies votes tomorrow whether to throw in with the Senate to revoke recent visa reinstatement. Tentative opinion is that the proposition will pass. My Brazilian immigration attorney here just told me that there is no indication in available sources that a vote is scheduled in the Chamber of Deputies regarding the revocation of the visa reinstatement. All recent reports here indicate the bill has stalled after passage in the lower house, the Senate. There is resistance in the Chamber of Deputies due to the US tariffs issue, and allies of Chamber Speaker Motta have indicated in the Brazilian press that the bill is unlikely to come to a vote there soon. floridarob 1 Quote
Members Riobard Posted August 13 Author Members Posted August 13 3 hours ago, hornyfrog said: My Brazilian immigration attorney here just told me that there is no indication in available sources that a vote is scheduled in the Chamber of Deputies regarding the revocation of the visa reinstatement. All recent reports here indicate the bill has stalled after passage in the lower house, the Senate. There is resistance in the Chamber of Deputies due to the US tariffs issue, and allies of Chamber Speaker Motta have indicated in the Brazilian press that the bill is unlikely to come to a vote there soon. Thanks. You are one of the many good ones. I do follow the news on this. I enter by searching “camara dos deputados agenda” and search under today’s date for Defense and Foreign Affairs where PDL 206/2023 is centred. It is listed today under propositions and votes, along with related documents and the trajectory from March. The opinions are one-sided, for the proposition, and do not much allude to the conflicts about which I am already aware. But Van Hattem’s brief is interesting. I’m not surprised about the complexity and bureaucratic layers and that a subcommittee or individual ministry would be reviewing it and perhaps need to endorse it preparatory to sending it up the line for a truly representative house vote. The two opposing political perspectives cancelling each other out certainly explain the inertia regarding any impending alterations to the visa requirements. I have no skin in the game as I have the visa. If it’s reversed I suppose some here may be interested if it obviates the need to apply. I expect if it’s reversed it will become common knowledge but my breath is not bated waiting. Apologies for deviating from the obsessional topics of trade fees. I would also be fine with my perspectives on the e-visa and CPF application topics being redacted. I can access the resources that truly matter to me in Brazil without chiming in on the minutiae of travel planning, and the usual array of board trolls don’t impede such accessibility and enjoyment. They just shed light on what the acompanhantes are up against and this amplifies my awe and respect for commercial sex workers. Quote
Members Riobard Posted August 13 Author Members Posted August 13 They made it through 17 of 31 agenda items and this topic was not (or not yet) covered. I’m as bored about it as I’m bored about board trolls. I extensively contribute to the tourism economy either way. My only interest is in expanding migratory period 90 day limit without the hassle of imploring fed police for extensions not guaranteed. Prospective visa application candidates? Have at it. Better yet, just apply and get one. Quote
floridarob Posted August 13 Posted August 13 23 minutes ago, Riobard said: My only interest is in expanding migratory period 90 day limit without the hassle of imploring fed police for extensions not guaranteed. Explore a digital nomad visa or a business visa if you can tie your stay to work or investment? Quote
