Riobard

“I’m happy to stand, guv’nor. Your rucksack looks frailer than me and exhausted. Cheers.”

You may have your bevvy of choice, but date cookies and sheep’s milk held back pending finishing the open-faced sardines on unleavened bread. Don’t know about any miracle of goat cheese on a plank.

Since you specify PrEP, I assume your query is related to HIV. If you are referring to the whole range of sexually transmitted disease (STIs), that changes the conversation. Since you specify sauna context, I assume you mean one’s playbook in a brothel setting. Your question, if HIV specific, also suggests you are ‘team cognizant of the limitations of PrEP’. For HIV, PrEP is typically considered “reasonable”, but knowledge and risk tolerance may determine a preference for supplementary protection such as condom use. Reasonable safety is not equivalent to progression towards optimal, failsafe even. If condoms are an elective measure you want some of the time and absent other occasions, my advice would be to not to put complete stock in the sexual and testing history of a sexual partner there. There may be a lot of steps and details to cover with friendly interrogation. It will likely be laborious for you. Also consider factors such as the risk perception paradox, where somebody especially sexually active yet tested negative two months ago could be more likely currently to transmit HIV compared to a poz chap with viral suppression on antiretroviral treatment. If you were to say to him that you are HIV negative, wish to remain that way, test regularly, use PrEP for transmission prevention … all this obviously signalling the relevance of his status … and you mention adding condom use electively for certain sexual practices, etc, you may then ask how he accommodates the needs and preferences of somebody like you. You are spared asking a guy about status when income is welded to the answer. You may discover that his response satisfies you and aligns with what you know and hope he knows and applies. You will assess what he understands and is prepared to be transparent about in relation to the occupational hazards he arguably should be aware of, and should be able to articulate. But there are plenty of condoms circulating around in the event that he falls short according to your expectations in this realm, or not. Personally, my HIV serostatus is negative, will remain so, and I don’t ask or know the status of sexual partners. Although I am certainly open to answering any questions they might pose. YMMV.

For most of us bald types the restitution would need to be a bikini wax, the classic GI Jane crotch. Not that my pubes would command much at auction following the standard permethrin rinse for parasites. So always have enough resources to cover the bukkake outing.

Right. Because linen thread count and transactional sex are the same thing. On TripAdvisor, the review is the product. Think function and consequence, and the asymmetry therein. It doesn’t purport to possess the evidence or machinery to rate veracity. Perhaps similar to rate your doctor, professor etc. For hotels and booking sites text content is a necessary aggregation of overall data points, combined with numerical ratings, to affect rankings and visibility. Drop down options enable the viewer to triangulate the various components when making consumer decisions. Consumer entities may often also respond, defensively, apologetically, what have you, to round out the data. Imagine the unedited cat fighting on an escort site, particularly an element of sex tourism for part of the client constituency, if such a parallel existed. Another site’s business model may be confined to advertising, such that allowing positive slants while declining negative ones is not necessarily logically inconsistent. They presumably cannot verify that either praise or criticism are true. The latter essentially asks the site to publish an allegation, one that most punters get their panties in a knot about and anticipate ahead of time anyway. Too bad; so sad. I believe they also explicitly declare non-responsibility for booking reservation financial deposits. It isn’t to say that negative reviews are wrong in principle, inaccurate, or shouldn’t exist in some contexts. I believe there is an entry point to report an escort and seek adjudication behind the scenes. There are various ways in which an ad can be removed; look at the contractual footnotes. Otherwise, praising comments function as advertising. Mind you, their caveat below subtly suggests that they are not to keen on opening the floodgates of tantrums related to how “into it” the escort seemed. Your cultured pearls are missing? Call the cops. If you are inordinately suspicious about client input, you can always ask the platform administration whether the advertiser has the capacity to create multiple bogus positive reviews that seem to be coming from different client pseudonyms. I think that would be a stretch.

Seems transparent enough to me. “Professional work in the … fantasy … space … tithe in hand” The nuance you seem to be missing is the 10% of your WEHO harvest to meet whatever philanthropic obligation his standard is. Let not your bellow of rage trail off into a whimper as the last of your fortune escapes your grasp … I’m not too worried about that for you, maybe others though.

This story explains why I’d consult counsel first when spontaneously stopped to take a multigenerational family photo, pricing regulatory risk accordingly. And display my rate card with required minimum, as well as contract application. Separate brochure and adjusted fees in German for making one. It’s all very solemn but one can always break the ice by joking “OK, where is it?” Unless, of course, German (see above).

Private solo frottage on the mattress?!

Default use of withdrawal: Bucharest in peace in the vault; no further interest accrued but B positive.

BREAKING: Carney renames Niagara Falls Niagara Falls. American administration blindsided.

No need … I find the ambient second-hand emitted as well as sidestream Sativa and Indica smoke exposure does the trick. All lungs are passive.

AFAIK, you didn’t do the hot dog in buns with relish, judging by your sketch. Maybe a deadline issue. Tom of Finland likely had plenty of time to finish. The whole enterprise seems to have been rather vanilla, though you were evidently happy without the associated ‘ending’. I only pant by numbers, preferably 69. You could say I suck. For pure filth, albeit with inclusivity, Bob Ross …

Decades later down that actual road act, shocking sequel, when Shellie’s blistering deadpan dismissal has evolved with further Suckratic mentoring …

Really? That phenomenon? Quelle surprise. Like for example a mid-20s jet-setting diva queen posing as an 18 year old virginal bespoke … some here fighting, pushing through hordes of punters, to pay him BRL5,000 for the privilege of 50 minutes of company, along with a Birkin-grade tip; others tagging him at $10.00? ScreenRecording_08-12-2026 14-12-19_1.mov