Moses Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 5 hours ago, PeterRS said: has still not responded to my question last Monday about all the Russian fires. Why do you think I would answer your questions? It's not worth my time: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts, but you usually start discussing me personally because you don't have any arguments to discuss the topic. London, British fire safety standards, 2017, 72 died: Quote
thaiophilus Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Moses said: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts, but you usually start discussing me personally because you don't have any arguments to discuss the topic. London, British fire safety standards, 2017, 72 died: Whataboutism is not "answer[ing] questions related to the discussion of facts." It's the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. PeterRS 1 Quote
PeterRS Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 8 hours ago, Moses said: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts Oh really? That has never been the caase in the past. In this and several other threads I have asked your views on a whole series of facts. In the one above it related to the facts about fires in Russia. But then to you inconvenient facts are simply not facts. They are statements to be glossed over, obfuscated and called downright lies. No one actually believes you! Quote