Moses Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 5 hours ago, PeterRS said: has still not responded to my question last Monday about all the Russian fires. Why do you think I would answer your questions? It's not worth my time: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts, but you usually start discussing me personally because you don't have any arguments to discuss the topic. London, British fire safety standards, 2017, 72 died: Quote
thaiophilus Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, Moses said: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts, but you usually start discussing me personally because you don't have any arguments to discuss the topic. London, British fire safety standards, 2017, 72 died: Whataboutism is not "answer[ing] questions related to the discussion of facts." It's the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. PeterRS 1 Quote
PeterRS Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago 8 hours ago, Moses said: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts Oh really? That has never been the caase in the past. In this and several other threads I have asked your views on a whole series of facts. In the one above it related to the facts about fires in Russia. But then to you inconvenient facts are simply not facts. They are statements to be glossed over, obfuscated and called downright lies. No one actually believes you! Quote
Moses Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 11 hours ago, thaiophilus said: Whataboutism is not "answer[ing] questions related to the discussion of facts." It's the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. Now I know why in this thread appears list of fires in Russia. Thank you. Quote
Moses Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 11 hours ago, thaiophilus said: strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation You cannot argue the facts what both cases Grenfell and Hong Kong has similar base: buildings were constructed by British fire safety standards, both fires occur during renovation, in both cases fire was in tall buildings. And London case even more worst: 72 died in one building, while in HK 155 in 6. So it is trend, not "whataboutism". Quote