Moses

Now I know why in this thread appears list of fires in Russia. Thank you.

Do we discussing reasons of Chernobyl, or we discussing shield which corrupted Ukraine finished "just" in 30+ years?

Why do you think I would answer your questions? It's not worth my time: I prefer to answer questions related to the discussion of facts, but you usually start discussing me personally because you don't have any arguments to discuss the topic. London, British fire safety standards, 2017, 72 died:

Oh, yes? Disaster in 1989, shield's construction finished in 2019. Wanna to discuss reasons?

As usual British "highly likely". Since drone's attack in February 2025 till now left 10 months. And still no even single evidence what it was Russian drone. The shelling of the Zaporozhie Nuclear Power Plant has been going on for the fourth year now. And for the fourth year, the West and Ukraine claim that Russia is doing the shelling. It's so logical, isn't it – to shoot at yourself? Of course, it's the Russian devils who are doing the shooting; how could Ukrainian angels possibly shoot? It's impossible to even imagine such a thing.

Bias? British fire safety standards are quite famous: London, Grenfell Tower, 2017, 72 victims.

Ukrainian pathetic attempt, dear, Ukrainian. And due famous Ukrainian corruption, construction of shield took 30 years. And these 30 years radiation was leaking.

People visit these bars to socialize, make new acquaintances, celebrate birthdays, and so on. Dancers in these bars act as tableaux vivants or create an erotic atmosphere, but not to be sold. If you're traveling alone, you can arrange a meeting at such a bar. The most successful bar in Saigon has been open for 16 years, and from Thursday to Saturday it's so packed that you can't even lift a hand, let alone dance: everyone stands shoulder to shoulder. And the secret to its success is the live music—excellent performers with magnificent voices and a repertoire ranging from Frank Sinatra and Ella Fitzgerald to Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift. https://www.instagram.com/thibarsaigon

Exactly! Good looking guys have their own "tail" of fans and monetize their popularity trough such shows. For clear understanding of that place: Vietnamese gay bars do not targeting tourists as a main customer group like in Thailand. Situation in VN is totally opposite: bars are for locals. Tourists are allowed to visit and will be served on the same level of hospitality. Go-go and host bars do not exists in VN, bars do not promote their waiters and dancers for to be private hired and do not provide such service.

So, how all that bla-bla-bla changes fact, what all these dangerous buildings were constructed in accordance with British standards and under supervising of British governor appointed by British crown?

Correct. And this code was applied under supervision of British appointed and controlled administration. Right?

So, you think British Standard about fire safety has "Absolutely nothing" with fire in the building constructed in accordance with that standard?

In 40 years old buildings the largest group 65+ is not a wonder with parachute you will be killed in 100% due rising air flow around hot walls... 0% chance to escape with parachute Evacuation stairs and safety floors once per 20-30 floors are most common and not that expensive options... elevators with fireproof systems exists, but they cost up to 25% of the cost of building By the way, buildings were constructed under British construction regulation laws (BS 476 - fireproof) and sold in 1983 under British governor Edward Youde, appointed to position by Margaret Thatcher

It is show bar. 50/50 drag and muscle show. Place for meeting with locals. You cannot "hire" dancers via bar. But you may talk with them privately and if you will be lucky (depends on your age, how good you look and amount of money), maybe you will get agreement.

US: 8 U.S.C. § 1304(e) 8 C.F.R. § 264.1

I have nobody in my ignoring list

The first stage is always denial.

Could you please switch on your brain for 1 minute? Of course they crossed the Belarus-Poland border! There are three possibilities: - they were pro-Russian saboteurs - they were Ukrainian saboteurs - they were saboteurs motivated by their own ideological reasons, for example, followers of those who carried out the genocide of Poles in Volyn Poland can be entered from the east from: - Russia - Belarus - Ukraine - Lithuania If the saboteurs are pro-Russian, they will not travel from Russia, so as not to demonstrate their affiliation; they cannot travel from Lithuania and Ukraine, because their regimes are hostile. That leaves Belarus. If the saboteurs are pro-Ukrainian, they will not travel from Ukraine or Lithuania, so as not to demonstrate their affiliation; they cannot travel from Russia, because their regimes are hostile. That leaves Belarus. If the saboteurs are ideological and not affiliated with any state, they cannot travel from Ukraine—crossing the border to the West is prohibited for men between 18 and 60 years old. For the same reason, they cannot enter through Lithuania, and they cannot travel through Russia because they lack Russian support. However, the Ukrainian-Belarusian border is densely forested and not as heavily guarded as the western border. That leaves Belarus. Bottom line: the optimal route to Poland for saboteurs of any affiliation is through Belarus.

You're the liar here. It was your limited brain that assumed my motives, and now you're trying to attribute them to me. You didn't even bother to understand the facts. Two saboteurs - 2 citizens of Ukraine - officially crossed the Polish border, were seen on CCTV cameras, committed an act of sabotage, and then officially crossed the border again, leaving Poland. These are facts. That's why Tusk reported the saboteurs' citizenship—they were identified on video, and their identity and citizenship were determined by biometric data left at the border. Everything else is your conjecture, just like Tusk's—it's impossible to determine who the saboteurs are working for from biometric data; they weren't detained, so they can't testify. And assuming that the Poles know who they're working for from other sources is stupid, because then the question arises: why were they allowed into Poland if they knew about their ties to Russia? The logical conclusion is that Tusk's statement about saboteurs' connections to Russia is political speculation, akin to the classic British slander "highly likely" assumption. Therefore, everything you wrote about me above is your dirty speculative conjecture, dirty lies, and slander. You're arrogant, confident in your own infallible rightness, a baseless, brainwashed, and limited-knowledge individual.

You still not got? I'm just playing and teasing. Here isn't right place to discuss real politic: nobody here has own source of information - everyone (almost, I know only Vinapu can read Russian and that means he maybe also may read Ukrainian) here takes the same information from filtered Western sources. What to discuss? Almost everyone here is believer into Western medias, templates and holy democracy. I can read information from all sides of conflict, compare and make own conclusions. And many things what you takes as a truth are just Western urban legends, implemented by Western propaganda. "Oceania has never been at war with Ostasia" - you know what I mean.

You again lie? Please quote me where I'm "falsely implying Ukraine". Whole "false implication" was in your mind. I wrote here only fact "2 citizens of Ukraine". Do you want to oppose that fact?

See above about McCarthyism. Nothing new for human civilization. I'm going to bed - 2AM here

The same March'22

Personally, I think he was deeply disliked in the Council. And the personal relationships between the deputies resulted in this outcome. Remember what happened in the US during McCarthyism? Or what they did to Japanese American citizens during the war—all those concentration camps in the US? That's roughly what happened in 2022—the government didn't yet understand how the majority of the population would react to the events and applied maximum force where it wasn't really needed.

No. It wasn't public meeting. It was Council meeting. By the way: trial was initiated by report of other members of Council.