Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Gay Guides Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Psychosis at M4M?

Featured Replies

  • Active Members

All I can say is "Wow." Someone resurrected at the M4M foums a 5 year-old string (What's Your Earliest "I'm Queer" memory?)  in which people were asked to recall when they first realized they were gay (in my case it when I was a 12 year-old in my gym class, admiring the 14 year-old who led us into calisthenics, which I discussed in my 2015 response). The string was locked with the following message:

"Thread Closed. It is against the rules to discuss children; even ourselves."

So discussing our past is child porn?? I don't think even Justice Thomas or Justice Alito would go that far.  I can certainly understand and wholly support banning child pornography. But if the mere mention of children in a non-sexual way is child pornography, so is Mary Poppins.  Am I the only person who feels this way, or is the leadership at M4M completely off its rocker?

Are You Nuts Emoticons for Facebook, Email & SMS | Emoticon faces

 

Edited by unicorn

  • Active Members
5 hours ago, unicorn said:

All I can say is "Wow." Someone resurrected at the M4M foums a 5 year-old string (What's Your Earliest "I'm Queer" memory?)  in which people were asked to recall when they first realized they were gay (in my case it when I was a 12 year-old in my gym class, admiring the 14 year-old who led us into calisthenics, which I discussed in my 2015 response). The string was locked with the following message:

"Thread Closed. It is against the rules to discuss children; even ourselves."

So discussing our past is child porn?? I don't think even Justice Thomas or Justice Alito would go that far.  I can certainly understand and wholly support banning child pornography. But if the mere mention of children in a non-sexual way is child pornography, so is Mary Poppins.  Am I the only person who feels this way, or is the leadership at M4M completely off its rocker?

Are You Nuts Emoticons for Facebook, Email & SMS | Emoticon faces

 

It is old news that the "leadership" at that site is totally of its rocker.

It is the one place, however, we can turn to for people who are arguing that Covid-19 is not a threat, that Donald Trump is a great national hero, and that senility is no reason not to share one;s thoughts with the world.

The site has totally degenerated into a resting place for sadistic and nasty kremlin fueled bots who do nothing but rant and rave and look for anybody, anybody at all to engage with.

And that is the TRUE meaning of "pornography".

  • Active Members
6 hours ago, SexyAsianStud said:

It is old news that the "leadership" at that site is totally of its rocker.

It is the one place, however, we can turn to for people who are arguing that Covid-19 is not a threat, that Donald Trump is a great national hero, and that senility is no reason not to share one;s thoughts with the world.

The site has totally degenerated into a resting place for sadistic and nasty kremlin fueled bots who do nothing but rant and rave and look for anybody, anybody at all to engage with.

And that is the TRUE meaning of "pornography".

Yes, there are right wing nuts there, but not as many as you allege. And you  and I are quite friendly, so I am not attacking you.

Edited by Buddy2
Incorrect spacing

  • Active Members
  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Buddy2 said:

Yes, there are right wing nuts there, but not as many as you allege. And you  and I are quite friendly, so I am not attacking you.

I agree with you, and appreciate your words of friendship... and I do not ever feel attacked by you.

Just two things.... the crazy right wing trolls over there - I am not sure how many of them there actually are because it seems highly possible that it may be even fewer than we think and it is one or two persons posting under multiple nicknames

the other thing is does it not seem bizarre to you that, of all places, these right wing nut job conspiracy theorists have sought out a board intended for men who seek the paid companionship of other men to advance their marginal views and make life hellish for anyone who disagrees with them? WTF are they even doing there?

  • Active Members
1 hour ago, SexyAsianStud said:

the other thing is does it not seem bizarre to you that, of all places, these right wing nut job conspiracy theorists have sought out a board intended for men who seek the paid companionship of other men to advance their marginal views and make life hellish for anyone who disagrees with them? WTF are they even doing there?

Has it ever occurred to you that right wing nuts also pay for sex?

Edited by Latbear4blk

  • Active Members
1 hour ago, Latbear4blk said:

Has it ever occurred to you that right wing nuts also pay for sex?

actually since they never post in discussions relating to masseurs and escorts AND since at least one of them boasts of being "proudly heterosexual" AND since they display toxic masculinities...let us just say that i have my doubts. profound doubts.

  • Active Members

M4M? At first I thought that was a massage site.

Oh, you meant Daddy's. His board survives through the kindness of donations. That's like driving a car on gas fumes. Maybe his failing IT business is collecting PUA benefits. I'm sure he ran to the government every chance he had with his hand out.

What can anyone expect from an owner who is deathly afraid of any scrutiny from the Feds? Daddy can't afford a parking ticket. He's essentially running an escort site in the U.S. and he doesn't want "child" or "children" appearing among his search data. Makes perfect sense to me.

  • Active Members
3 hours ago, SexyAsianStud said:

actually since they never post in discussions relating to masseurs and escorts AND since at least one of them boasts of being "proudly heterosexual" AND since they display toxic masculinities...let us just say that i have my doubts. profound doubts.

That "proudly heterosexual" has posted he is only there to post a conservative agenda in the political forum. Otherwise, he would have no interest. So you right!!

  • Active Members
47 minutes ago, Buddy2 said:

That "proudly heterosexual" has posted he is only there to post a conservative agenda in the political forum. Otherwise, he would have no interest. So you right!!

I thought that was the job of Russian bots.

  • Active Members
11 hours ago, caeron said:

Toxic people are toxic.

Maybe if more of them injected lysol we'd all be better off.

Lysol, Clorox, ultraviolet radiation; I don't care what the Trump cult members ingest as long as they triple the dose. The perfect ending to this cult.

  • Active Members

I think the level of psychosis of the Daddy's management is quite congruent with some of the active posters on the politics board. i do not name names (BSR, Bnac, Augustus), but they are a fairly seamless team and are doing their best to destroy whatever credibility may have at one time existed there.

perhaps "daddy" (ugh... what a revolting image that is!) should choose a more worthwhile profession and take his evil Gang of Three along with him.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.