Moses

in 20th century? Russian Central Bank is genius in fighting with inflation. For that Nabiullina - head of CB - got "Central Banker of the Year" twice - in 2015 and 2017. You are writing lie after lie. Pure propaganda. Just visit World Bank data and see real facts: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG?end=2021&locations=RU&start=2000 In 2023 Russian economy is #1 by GDP growing in Europe and #5 in World.

Are you sure you choose right member to address your words? I'm just speaking the opponent's language

Dear, all your "news" are from filtered sources. You eating that shit and thinking it is food. I'm living here and every day see what's going on in real life. Why you trying to feed me with that shit? Eat it yourself if you believe what it is real food.

Mental problems of Biden are wide known.

And only three kept countries managed to make a political decision to recognize the operation in Ukraine as genocide - they have no other choice: they are completely dependent on external funding from the US and the EU. Even in the unfriendly countries of the NATO bloc, where there is a large diaspora of Ukrainians - Canada and Poland, parliaments were unable to make the same political decision, because not everyone is ready to look like an idiot even for money.

My point is: no one country or block committed Putin in genocide. Because there is not a single court verdict.

Propaganda and bullshit. Instead of scavenging in garbage dumps, you could just go to the ICC website and read the decision. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and There is no proof, because decision has been made by pre-trial chamber of ICC. Moreover, even in decision they use word "believe". This is a mockery of law and has nothing to do with justice. And there is no word "genocide. "Genocide" and Putin are linked together only in brains of propagandists. No one point of Rome statute what is mentioned in the decision of ICC about Putin is linked to genocide, which is article 6 of Rome statute and point (e) of article 25 https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf

Dear, you are now looking at a map on which the countries and blocks of countries in which the fact of genocide in Ukraine was recognized by the court are indicated in red Here the countries in which parliaments made a political decision to recognize the genocide are indicated in blue. And the strange green color indicates countries in which, although they tried to make a political decision on genocide, one of the chambers did not agree to dance to the drum of propaganda.

It was enough to write these 6 words

USSR isn't Russia, dear. You are writing about another country with another political system and territory. Ask commy about it.

Are you wringing your hands again in false suffering and indignation? US nuclear weapons are located: in Belgium in Germany in Turkey in the Netherlands at two bases in Italy Why doesn't Russia disperse its weapons? Russia, by placing weapons in Belarus, is simply warning. And the conditions allow for placement in Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. I think you will especially like the first two points. And this will simply be a symmetrical response: the United States placed bombs closer to Russia, Russia placed bombs closer to the United States.

Oh, stop it. Your propaganda is stupid. However, I understand you, because in essence my statement you has nothing to answer - the United States actually burned in nuclear fire, according to various estimates, from 150 to 350 thousand civilians in cities in which, in principle, there were no military targets. The United States really hasn’t apologized in 80 years. Do you know what US Air Force General Curtis LeMay said about his firebombing of Japanese cities? "If we had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal."

Such personal attacks are usually characteristic of poorly educated people who do not know how to conduct reasoned discussions.

The fake hand-wringing in fake outrage by the people of a country that in 3 days vaporized almost 200,000 women and children in two nuclear bombings of civilians looks like the height of cynicism and buffoonery. Your country burned 200,000 innocent civilians and in 80 years has not found the courage to apologize. What moral right do you have to say something about Russia’s actions?

One small piece of advice: I advise you to think about whether you should use the word “child”, because it may say more about your inclinations than you would like others to know about it.

Once again for the remote areas of Arizona, or wherever you live there: I type in Russian and then just press “send” without checking what Google translated - I don’t care if there is an error or not. Therefore, if there is an error in what you are reading and you want to let someone know about it, then go here: support-in@google.com

By the way, when you start making comments about this or that word, it makes me happy. Because it shows that you have nothing to object to the facts that I am setting out here. And yes, mistakes and typos don’t bother me much: in any case, I speak your language much better than you speak mine. This is also a Google translation. For speed.

No dear, I just don't bother with it and use the Google translator built into the browser when I type my answers.

I expect you to be smarter. My phrase means: it is translation by Google. So, you may write your claims to Google, dear.

Yes. Keyword is:

Tip: tell it to Google, dear.

My last visit to Pattaya was in 2022. Before that I was there in 2019, and before 2019 I came from 2009 to 2016 every year several times. According to my impressions, from 2016 to 2019 Pattaya seriously sank as a bar business; in 2019 there was a feeling of fatigue and depression everywhere. The visit in 2022 brought a double impression. On the one hand, depression is no longer felt. Business came to life, became more energetic, one might even say more professional. On the other hand, business has become mechanical, guys are more indifferent. They don’t even try to imitate interest in you, they work like at the cash register at McDonald’s - the main task is to get your order as quickly as possible. Immediately after this, interest instantly disappears. I remember with nostalgia the host bars of the early 2010s, when I came to the bar and felt like a welcome guest, I was treated and entertained. None of this exists anymore. Now I am a visitor, not a guest.

Yes, dear, you call me, so I came. I like all last your posts: clear hysteria without any attempt to decline any of my fact. Because I say truth. And that make you even more hysterical. Remember: Ukrainian conflict is created by West and sponsored by West. This is all your fault. Fault of your silence in 2014 - 2022. The West doesn’t care about Ukraine, about “women and children” - the West is saving the Ukrainian regime by supplying the country with weapons and paying mercenaries. So stop wringing your hands in hysterics. The West, primarily Obama, who allowed the US to inspire and financially support the coup in Ukraine, and Nuland, who was the ideologist of this coup, are responsible for what is happening in Ukraine - from the coup to the death of civilians. “Nobody is pushing this war more than Nuland,” the Tesla co-founder Elon Musk wrote on the social media site X last February. "Modern diplomacy" about Nuland: "The general impression of Nuland is of an inveterate ‘hawk’ and Russophobe fired up by neoconservative ideology and American exceptionalism who precipitated the Russian intervention in Ukraine and is largely responsible for fueling the ongoing war. Of course, there is no denying that Nuland played a key role in the regime change in Kyiv 10 years ago."

Jonson in Kiev, April 2022. This is not my words, dear. Words of head of Ukrainian delegation on peace talks - David Arachamiya. He said it on November 2023 in interview to Ukrainian TV. Turn on subtitles with translation in English and you will read yourself: "They were ready to end the war if we took – like Finland once – neutrality and made a commitment that we would not join NATO." "when we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything with them at all - and let’s just fight"

Until 2019, Russia repeatedly warned that Ukraine’s accession to NATO was unacceptable for Russia’s national security, that it was a “red line”, crossing which would cause irreversible consequences. But under the first president of the puppet regime of Ukraine after the coup, Poroshenko, an article on joining NATO was included in the Ukrainian constitution to the applause of the West in 2019. From that moment on, the consequences of such a decision could no longer be avoided. By the way, the people who led the coup in Ukraine - Prime Minister of the first government Yatsenyuk and the first "president" Poroshenko - quickly realized what consequences awaited them after the start of the military conflict. Yatsenyuk moved to Washington. Poroshenko was less fortunate - he tried to leave Ukraine three times and was stopped at the border three times and returned to the country. The Zelenskiy regime needs hostages. Now he is suing Zelensky, and the day before yesterday the court again denied him the right to leave Ukraine.