Guest StuCotts Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 With the flattering, painterly treatment, it's easy to fantasize some real chemistry between him and the photographer. He at least owes the man a blow job of gratitude. http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/09/...yal1.ready.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lucky Posted September 14, 2008 Members Share Posted September 14, 2008 You LIKED that dreary pic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 The better picture is here http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http...ficial%26sa%3DN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 The better picture is here More than one source says this is a Photoshopped fake. Our own RockHard on daddysreviews described enlarging it in Photoshop and detecting the line of blurred pixels just below waist level that revealed the cut-and-paste. I haven't bothered to check his work, but I believe him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Since I'll probably never meet Daniel in real life, I don't really care if it's a fake or not. If it's good enough to whack off to, it's good enough for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 This nude pic is verified. http://movies.popcrunch.com/daniel-radclif...-vogue-picture/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lucky Posted September 14, 2008 Members Share Posted September 14, 2008 I will be viewing the penis in question from Row E, but, alas, not until November. I will not exaggerate its size, or minimize its potential. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members lookin Posted September 14, 2008 Members Share Posted September 14, 2008 "I will not exaggerate its size, or minimize its potential." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members OneFinger Posted September 15, 2008 Members Share Posted September 15, 2008 I will be viewing the penis in question from Row E, but, alas, not until November. I will not exaggerate its size, or minimize its potential. I'm taking my binoculars when I see him in October from Row G. Hopefully, I'll be able to verify if the picture in question is a fake or not. Have tried contacting him to see if he's available for a one-on-one session that night. But, alas, he hasn't responded (yet). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 I'm told he only sees guys who know the Dicktactious Spell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StuCotts Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 You LIKED that dreary pic? It's not the pic that's dreary, it's the face. I think the photographer did as much as can be done with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Radcliffe can be hot when shot the right way. He has one of those faces that can be awesome or awful depending on the lighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StuCotts Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Radcliffe can be hot when shot the right way.He has one of those faces that can be awesome or awful depending on the lighting. Reminds me of a scene that I think I remember in Smiles of a Summer Night, where Fredrik Egerman says approximately: "My body looks good, but not in the light and not in perspective". If the photographer has to deploy all his tricks to make you look good, you don't look good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 But in Radcliffe's case he's been hit by a curse from Lord Voldemorte that alters his attractiveness. You can't blame him for being a victim of the Dark Arts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StuCotts Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 But in Radcliffe's case he's been hit by a curse from Lord Voldemorte that alters his attractiveness.You can't blame him for being a victim of the Dark Arts. No blame for nobody nohow. But I do confess to some puzzlement about all the heavy breathing directed at him. Unless my info is off, the sight of his pics is enough to guarantee that myriad dicks will be pounded and as many pussies vibrated. Over what? His face is at very best ordinary, his body is no better than nice, and his dick in the dick shot seen round the world is ersatz. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members TampaYankee Posted September 15, 2008 Members Share Posted September 15, 2008 No blame for nobody nohow.But I do confess to some puzzlement about all the heavy breathing directed at him. Unless my info is off, the sight of his pics is enough to guarantee that myriad dicks will be pounded and as many pussies vibrated. Over what? His face is at very best ordinary, his body is no better than nice, and his dick in the dick shot seen round the world is ersatz. ? Speaks more to the horniness of the beholder than the hotness of the pics. no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiBottomBoy Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 It's because he can hit you with the Cumstatious Curse! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
