Jump to content
Lucky

37% of Fish Is Not What It Is Sold As

Recommended Posts

  • Members

From SFGate:

Misbranding food for financial gain is illegal under state and federal law. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration
publishes a guide of acceptable market names for certain fish species,
but the laws can be complicated. The agency, for instance, lists 14
species that can be labeled "tuna."

Oceana has thus far found seafood mislabeling everywhere it has done testing, including Boston, Los Angeles, Miami and Monterey. The group hopes to test fish platters in at least six coastal cities around the country.

The
DNA-testing campaign, in which dozens of volunteers are provided
testing kits with instructions and monitoring sheets, created an uproar
when the early results came out. In South Florida, Shester said, results
showed that 31 percent of the fish tested at restaurants and markets
was mislabeled.

In Los Angeles, 55 percent, and in Boston, 48 percent of the fish sold was not what it was touted to be, he said.

Bad surprise

A
closer look at the results in Los Angeles showed that eight out of nine
sushi samples labeled as "white tuna," or shiro maguro, were actually
escolar, which Shester calls the "ex-lax fish" for its purgative effect
on the digestive system. Escolar is not among the 14 species that can
legally be labeled as tuna.

Oceana found that 87 percent of the
sushi venues tested misrepresented the fish being served, the worst
record of any type of restaurant. Thirty-one percent of grocery stores
misidentified fish, Shester said.

One of advocates' biggest
concerns is the unadvertised use of shark meat in fish tacos, Shester
said, because, among other reasons, sharks often contain high
concentrations of mercury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest zipperzone

At least I know it is genuine at my favorite sushi place in SoCal which has the best sushi I've ever had any where and that includes my many trips to Japan.

I'm not a fish fancier. Would never eat it voluntarily. Especially sushi. The very thought of eating raw fish curdles my blood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least I know it is genuine at my favorite sushi place in SoCal which has the best sushi I've ever had any where and that includes my many trips to Japan.

But isn't the point that the customer doesn't know that he isn't getting what he is told he is? The restaurant itself might not know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fish may be a large group of mis-identified food but escargot may the largest single item that is mis-labeled.

Best regards,

RA1

Although in truth I've never seen an escargot much larger than an inch across. ^_^

Unless the mislabeling goes in the opposite direction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Although in truth I've never seen an escargot much larger than an inch across. :smile:

Unless the mislabeling goes in the opposite direction?

I think it fits into a group with giant shrimp.

Best regards,

RA1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...