Moses

It was 5 countries on the start. As per ChatGPT on Nov 2024:

Oh. I missed it. Germany is "export based economy" because export is above 40% of GDP. China isn't more than for 10 years, because by UN and World Bank classifications "export based economy" should have more than 20% of GDP from export. China now has less than 17%. It grew up from that label long time ago. Internal consumption - this is main Chinese driver. https://w3.unece.org/PXWeb/en/Table?IndicatorCode=4

In far 2014, even before coup in Ukraine I wrote (here or on SGT?) what Western attempts to push on Russia will bring to West one only result - it will push Russia and China close to each other. Now world has BRICS and BRICS+. By the way: when you are visiting Thailand you are visiting BRICS+. The same with Malaysia and Indonesia, Brazil and many other countries what are on discussions "where boys are cheaper" on this forum.

what "signalize" threat to cancel visafree to Georgians? about what money EU citizens may think on it besides additional profit from more active tourism?

If China will do it, whole Western media sphere will squeal like a flock of 1000 pigs being slaughtered at once, nobody will write something about "because it can" and all will remind about democracy and despots, while both - democracies and despots - doing the same and by the same reason "because it can"...

Correction: he still applied "to be part" of EU. As we see - you have no reason to call it "democracy". Look on Georgia - on election there won not that party what has been expected by EU and now EU threatening Georgia. Look on Romania - on the first round of presidential elections there won not person what has been expecting by EU and now Romania is under hard pressure of EU... I can add Slovakia or Hungary to that list as well...

Well, then your "voice of displeasure" brings nothing: US still participate in all wars what your govt count necessary. And this brings us to the point of the choice: 1) nobody listens "voice of displeasure" and cares about it or 2) your nation is for the wars and "voice of pleasure" is louder than "voice of displeasure" = voice of minority why else US still participate in wars each year under each president? you may choose...

at least it is true and isn't personal attacks like pics above

I will tell one only word: Snowden

Do you know what the President of Serbia answered to a journalist's question about why the country, along with other European countries, is not collecting and sending weapons to help Ukraine in the conflict with Russia? - It wasn't Russia that bombed us in 1999...

That exactly I say. Country what murdered millions of own people is despoty, but country what murdered foreign people in your eyes is democracy... - Why you bombed Yugoslavia? - For democracy... - Why you bombed Iraq and murdered there 600 000? - For democracy! - Oh, it is OK then...

Any memories about Syrian invasions?

The problem is what it not democracy stick pawns, but American "democracy" stick pawns in foreign countries. Americans have benefits, and countries have "mess". Once again: Gaddafi was bad, pawn was "sticked" and now Libya has 13 years of civilian war and few "governments.

Could you please name one? Turkey? Erdogan now will be sure, what Kurds will have no shelter anymore. But what it will bring to Turkish people? Israel? Well I don't know how it will be benefited by existence of one more radical Islamic regime. Directly on it border. Jordan? Iraq?

Do you know what the advantage of my position on the forum is? I have never written that there is democracy in the country where I live. On the contrary, I have written that there are problems with freedoms and democracy here. That is why I easily smirk to their face every time some arrogant American and proud Briton without reason starts telling me about democracy. These people are so brainwashed that they are sure that there is democracy in their countries. I suppose it is because they have been told about it from every iron since they were in diapers. Respected people, the word "democracy" implies the management and control of power by the people. Therefore, if you insist that you have democracy, then you will have to agree that the atrocities in Vietnam were committed with the knowledge, consent, on behalf of and under the control of the people. As well as the bombing of Japan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, the invasion of Cuba, Panama, Nicaragua, the wars in Laos. If you have a democracy, you have to agree that this was done in your name: It's simple for me: they ask me "why are your troops in Ukraine?" and I can easily answer "because we don't have democracy." And what will you answer to the question "why was there a war in Vietnam?" Or "why are your troops still in Japan (Germany, South Korea, etc.... substitute the appropriate word)?" Or "what are your troops doing in Syria, although you have long declared that ISIS was defeated?" Because if you insist in democracy in your country, then you is responsible for actions of your govt.

Dreams, dreams. I'm from Northern country - here we have thick skin.

No. It didn't slip out. I remember very well that you continue to take revenge on everyone: Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Nicaragua, Panama, Iraq, Syria, Libya... and you "take revenge" without ceasing... As for me personally, no one can say about me "When he was young, he came to kill and torture young guys in Asia, and when he became old, he began to come and fuck for money the grandchildren of those whom he did not manage to kill when he was young." What about you?

Oh, sorry, I forgot propagandistic picture, which is for sure forged in Kremlin:

Why? Are you sad already because your country gave shelter to Nazi after WWII? Or are you sad because US dropped nuclear bombs and vaporized hundred thousands of Japanese civilians (here should be propagandistic "including women and kids" like loves to write Western propaganda)?

Okay, then let's talk about Qatar or the UAE? Something about despotism, democracy, opposition? About the urgent need to land American troops there and stimulate the opposition for another Arab Spring? No? Really, if they buy American weapons, then why spoil the relationship with the client? Then maybe we can immediately formulate the main feature of despotism and a terrible regime? Let's write it like this: a regime that does not buy American weapons is despotic. And if the regime buys weapons, then it is "democracy".

Right in the center of Europe, an absolute, and moreover, theocratic monarchy lives and flourishes. Its name is the Vatican. Don't you want to introduce "the basic principles of democracy" there? Land American troops, finance the opposition, preferably a radical one, in order to undermine the monarch's power without much expense and risk... No? Why not? Because there are no oil?

Yeah, yeah. And the examples of installations in the Middle East of other "basic foundations of democracy" didn't make you think? Now on the world map there is Iraq with the "basic foundation of democracy" without Saddam Hussein but with ISIS, Iran with the "basic foundation of democracy" and the ayatollah, Libya with two "basic foundations of democracy" that are waging a civil war with each other. Attempts to implement the "basic foundations of democracy" in Algeria in 2012 and 2019 almost brought ISIS to power in this country, fortunately the long-standing president had enough steel in his balls to prevent this. Are you sure that these were attempts to install the "Basic Foundations of Democracy"?

with whom? whole this circus, what started before intervention of Russia in 2015, was inspired by US - there was "triangle" Assad, ISIS and "democratic" Islamic radical movement backed by US because it was competitor to ISIS... Military intervention of US to Syria against will of legal Syrian govt was done under label "fight with ISIS"... OK, official intentions are good. But when US declared ISIS defeated many years ago, it still kept US troops in region. For what? Now Syria will have "democratic" radical Islamist regime. Exactly this one with which "democratic sharing" was expected.

When you want to count resolutions UN, you should start from number of UN resolutions which been ignored by Israel. Because they are tens if not hundreds.

what part of post about Syria sticks to topic? you said about propaganda - I show you it