Moses

So, how all that bla-bla-bla changes fact, what all these dangerous buildings were constructed in accordance with British standards and under supervising of British governor appointed by British crown?

Correct. And this code was applied under supervision of British appointed and controlled administration. Right?

So, you think British Standard about fire safety has "Absolutely nothing" with fire in the building constructed in accordance with that standard?

In 40 years old buildings the largest group 65+ is not a wonder with parachute you will be killed in 100% due rising air flow around hot walls... 0% chance to escape with parachute Evacuation stairs and safety floors once per 20-30 floors are most common and not that expensive options... elevators with fireproof systems exists, but they cost up to 25% of the cost of building By the way, buildings were constructed under British construction regulation laws (BS 476 - fireproof) and sold in 1983 under British governor Edward Youde, appointed to position by Margaret Thatcher

It is show bar. 50/50 drag and muscle show. Place for meeting with locals. You cannot "hire" dancers via bar. But you may talk with them privately and if you will be lucky (depends on your age, how good you look and amount of money), maybe you will get agreement.

US: 8 U.S.C. § 1304(e) 8 C.F.R. § 264.1

I have nobody in my ignoring list

The first stage is always denial.

Could you please switch on your brain for 1 minute? Of course they crossed the Belarus-Poland border! There are three possibilities: - they were pro-Russian saboteurs - they were Ukrainian saboteurs - they were saboteurs motivated by their own ideological reasons, for example, followers of those who carried out the genocide of Poles in Volyn Poland can be entered from the east from: - Russia - Belarus - Ukraine - Lithuania If the saboteurs are pro-Russian, they will not travel from Russia, so as not to demonstrate their affiliation; they cannot travel from Lithuania and Ukraine, because their regimes are hostile. That leaves Belarus. If the saboteurs are pro-Ukrainian, they will not travel from Ukraine or Lithuania, so as not to demonstrate their affiliation; they cannot travel from Russia, because their regimes are hostile. That leaves Belarus. If the saboteurs are ideological and not affiliated with any state, they cannot travel from Ukraine—crossing the border to the West is prohibited for men between 18 and 60 years old. For the same reason, they cannot enter through Lithuania, and they cannot travel through Russia because they lack Russian support. However, the Ukrainian-Belarusian border is densely forested and not as heavily guarded as the western border. That leaves Belarus. Bottom line: the optimal route to Poland for saboteurs of any affiliation is through Belarus.

You're the liar here. It was your limited brain that assumed my motives, and now you're trying to attribute them to me. You didn't even bother to understand the facts. Two saboteurs - 2 citizens of Ukraine - officially crossed the Polish border, were seen on CCTV cameras, committed an act of sabotage, and then officially crossed the border again, leaving Poland. These are facts. That's why Tusk reported the saboteurs' citizenship—they were identified on video, and their identity and citizenship were determined by biometric data left at the border. Everything else is your conjecture, just like Tusk's—it's impossible to determine who the saboteurs are working for from biometric data; they weren't detained, so they can't testify. And assuming that the Poles know who they're working for from other sources is stupid, because then the question arises: why were they allowed into Poland if they knew about their ties to Russia? The logical conclusion is that Tusk's statement about saboteurs' connections to Russia is political speculation, akin to the classic British slander "highly likely" assumption. Therefore, everything you wrote about me above is your dirty speculative conjecture, dirty lies, and slander. You're arrogant, confident in your own infallible rightness, a baseless, brainwashed, and limited-knowledge individual.

You still not got? I'm just playing and teasing. Here isn't right place to discuss real politic: nobody here has own source of information - everyone (almost, I know only Vinapu can read Russian and that means he maybe also may read Ukrainian) here takes the same information from filtered Western sources. What to discuss? Almost everyone here is believer into Western medias, templates and holy democracy. I can read information from all sides of conflict, compare and make own conclusions. And many things what you takes as a truth are just Western urban legends, implemented by Western propaganda. "Oceania has never been at war with Ostasia" - you know what I mean.

You again lie? Please quote me where I'm "falsely implying Ukraine". Whole "false implication" was in your mind. I wrote here only fact "2 citizens of Ukraine". Do you want to oppose that fact?

See above about McCarthyism. Nothing new for human civilization. I'm going to bed - 2AM here

The same March'22

Personally, I think he was deeply disliked in the Council. And the personal relationships between the deputies resulted in this outcome. Remember what happened in the US during McCarthyism? Or what they did to Japanese American citizens during the war—all those concentration camps in the US? That's roughly what happened in 2022—the government didn't yet understand how the majority of the population would react to the events and applied maximum force where it wasn't really needed.

No. It wasn't public meeting. It was Council meeting. By the way: trial was initiated by report of other members of Council.

Wrong. He was municipal deputy, not a "Moscow city deputy" - and that is huge difference. 7 years is correct. He was first person who was prosecuted. He said in March'22 exactly "For information, I will say that about 100 children died in Ukraine." In April 2022 at the trial, he was unable to provide evidence to support his claims and was accused of disinformation.

In Russian we have popular proverb "One fool can ask so many questions that 7 wise men won't be able to answer them all in time". I'm sure you aren't fool, but proverb demonstrating situation: you publish a lot of question, each is short, but I have to explain context about each one. And English isn't my best skill. So I take just one easy proofing fact from each post and show you result.

Police protected her from public. Read article with help of Google translation.

Well then let's talk about facts. Osipova wasn't fined She made exhibition of her antiwar arts in SPB. There were 77 her works. I will quote news: "One day, Osipova took to the streets with anti-war posters, which read, among other things, "The war in Ukraine and Syria is Russia's shame." The artist was surrounded by a crowd of angry people who began snatching the posters from her, threatening her, and calling her a traitor. Osipova was only saved that time by the appearance of riot police, who intervened between the crowd and the artist." More here in Russian (speaking about opposition medias) https://www.severreal.org/a/v-peterburge-politseyskie-snyali-kartiny-s-antivoennoy-vystavki/32249563.html As you can see - this information is freely distributing here. It is opposition media at Russian Nord-West, sponsored by Radio Freedom (US). And state don't need to suppress such individuals - public will do it instead.

That "they" saying you by Western TV? Well it is speculation. In meaning "false information" most of punished were prosecuted for to spreading "news" from Ukrainian propaganda, like "millions of Russian soldiers were forced to go to war and were killed".

Correction: on December 22, 2022 https://t.me/RIAKremlinpool/8504 it is Telegram channel of RIA "Novosti" - official state news (and propaganda) agency. He said "Our goal is not to spin the flywheel of military conflict, but rather to end this war." in context of "Everything started in 2014 from coup in Kiev".

Wrong. First time he said that word on December 23, 2022 - on press-conferense in front of a lot of journalists. You can easy find this video. There are NO "major independent medias" who support opposition: just because it is against mainstream. Any major medias here are within mainstream - only on this way they can sell advertising and have readers/watchers, otherwise it will lose all readers/watchers. As soon, as any media will support unpopular here point of view it will be marginal and die. It is like in your country communist (or Nazi) party (let's pretend it exists) will start to publish newspaper. How long it will survive? Nope. Since "tsar" - how West call Putin - said that word.

There's no point in arguing with believers. If you want to believe Western propaganda, good luck. BUT, unlike you, who only see filtered news, I live here. And I see what's really going on.

Wrong. Putin himself uses word "war". For example official Russian news agency quoted him here https://ria.ru/20241018/ukraina-1978774925.html "War in Ukraine started in 2014". So it is urban legend on the West since 2023. Private Russian TV channel Tsargrad uses word "war" as a tag for to filter news https://tsargrad.tv/tags/vojna-na-ukraine It is channel which propagate monarchy in Russia. It isn't that popular, but you may see on any TV-receiver it in every city of Russia without subscription or special equipment. Wrong. There are a lot here. But they aren't popular since population supports Putin in mass. So they appear on horizon and die. What is true - mass medias can't be financed from abroad currently. But without Western support they just don't survive. Russia has introduced a foreign agent law, similar to the US. Those receiving foreign support are required to use the "foreign agent" label in all publications. And since patriotism is currently quite high here, no one buys such publications, they have no advertising, and the media is dying. Oh, that's complete BS. Urban legends. At least at the state level. Perhaps at some private level it exists, but it's all about property, money, or corruption. Politics has nothing to do with it. The Russian state isn't as cannibalistic as the Western media portrays it. The state does something much simpler and easier: it creates conditions in which such people prefer to leave Russia. Not because it's dangerous to live here, but because they can't make a living here. No one hires them here, and because of sanctions, the West can't support them here—it's impossible to transfer money here. So they leave, and then start working for Western media and singing songs "How terrible it is to live in Russia."