Lucky

A recess appointment is only good for one year.

Patience when a hot butt might be in the works? You kid!

If it would shut you up, I am sure we could find some volunteers!

That is the same point wherein Obama will support marriage eqaulity.

Face it, there are plenty of guys whom you try make create anal disharge!

I vote for anything by the Chipmunks.

And oz specifically said that moderators could. Wassamatter, you afraid Barry will top you?

Many do don't have the money to spend- what are they to do?

Oh, Oz. By all means don't see it. If the pics of Jeremy Irvine are not enough,then you'd be wasting your time.

I would spend my %500 on efforts to bring world peace. I'd visit Thailand, or Brazil,or Colombia, and personally relate to the natives the values of MER.

Gov. Chris Gregoire said Wednesday she wants Washington to become the seventh state in the nation to make gay marriage legal. She said at a news conference she'll introduce legislation that, if passed, would allow same-sex marriage in Washington state. More on the story: My link

Honey, bishops of the Church are not allowed to get married or have children. Your Daddy had 2 children, and had been living a lie until he got caught. Thus it is that Auxiliary Bishop Gabino Zavala, 60, told the archdiocese of Los Angeles in December that he was the father of two teenagers who live out of the state with their mother. He is looking for work.My papa

Hehehe- Lurkerspeaks will be out of the contest for a few days since he is taking that new sleep medicine!

That guy must not have been Lucky!

People really think this way: On Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, the Chicago Tribune's editorial board published their opinion of Cardinal Francis George's comments on Chicago's "gay pride" parade. Referring to Cardinal George's hope that the "gay liberation movement" would not "morph into something like the Ku Klux Klan, demonstrating in the streets against Catholicism," the editors used the adjective "bizarre." The board's characterization of his analogy as "bizarre" reveals several things: It reveals the editorial board's obvious and increasingly strident liberal bent; it reveals that they, like many homosexual activists, possess an obtuseness when it comes to analogies; and it reveals their ignorance of the views and rhetoric of many within the "gay liberation" movement. As I wrote last week, in expressing his hope that the "gay liberation movement" would not "morph into something like the Ku Klux Klan, demonstrating in the streets against the Catholicism," Cardinal George was comparing the anti-Catholic rhetoric and offensive parades of the KKK to the anti-Catholic rhetoric and offensive parades of the "gay liberation" movement. Cardinal George never argued that the racism or violence of the KKK was analogous to the actions of the "gay liberation" movement. Rather, he suggested that both groups see the Catholic Church as an enemy. That claim is indisputable. I think it's unlikely that the parade organizers planned the route and time change to disrupt services at Mount Saint Carmel Church, but the utter contempt for the sensibilities and beliefs of all people who hold orthodox Christian beliefs is obvious in the planning and execution of this sorry spectacle that regularly violates public decency laws, indecency which the Trib editors euphemistically trivialize when they with feigned coyness state that anyone who attends the parade will "get an eyeful" (nudge, nudge, wink, wink). Homosexual journalist and "lapsed Catholic," Rex Wockner writes: The Chicago gay pride parade attracts 800,000 people. It proceeds through a heavily congested, dense urban cityscape. Absolutely positively everything in its wake is disrupted. What on earth makes one service at one church on one day special enough to change the start time of a gigantic parade? The "gay liberation" movement couldn't care less if their parade of perversion and egregious public lewdness disrupts the services of scores of churches. And likely the Trib's editorial board doesn't care either. Worse than their obtuseness regarding Cardinal George's analogy is the editorial board's dishonest misrepresentation of his comments. The editors conclude by asserting that the parade does not "stifle anyone's religious beliefs." Nice rhetorical trick. The deceit, of course, is that Cardinal George never claimed the parade would stifle beliefs. He said it might "interfere" with worship. Surely, the editors would concede that it's possible that it might interfere with worship services. Those who don't want to see public nudity or wild celebrations of sexual perversion, or who don't want their children to see such images, might justifiably deem the parade an interference. Although Cardinal George did not refer to "stifling religious belief," the editors did, so I will respond: They must be kidding. Are they actually arguing that no member of the "gay liberation" movement seeks to stifle religious belief? Many in the movement to normalize homosexuality seek to eradicate all orthodox religious belief or at minimum make it so socially, legally, and politically costly that no one will dare express such beliefs. The "gay liberation" movement poses a serious threat to First Amendment religious protections (not to mention speech and parental rights). In addition, the virulent hatred many homosexual activists have for Catholic (and Protestant) orthodoxy is fully comparable to the virulent hatred that members of the KKK had. Perhaps the Trib's editorial board should spend more time visiting some of the infamous "gay" blogs whose commenters regularly spew intolerant, uncivil, and vulgar hatred toward the Catholic Church. As journalists, the Tribune editorial board should remember ACT-UP's interference with services at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York, Bash Back's interference with a church service in Michigan, the interference of services at Holy Name Cathedral, and the hateful protests in front of Moody Church -- all of which were done at least to oppose if not "stifle" religious belief. Any absolute claim that homosexuals will never organize a march to oppose the Catholic Church would seem naive, foolish, and maybe even bizarre. I, like Cardinal George, hope it will never happen. Take ACTION: If you find the Tribune's pro-homosexual advocacy offensive, please consider canceling your subscription and expressing your views by clicking nah-ahh to send an email to the Tribune's Editorial Page Editor Bruce Dold, Deputy Editorial Page Editor, John McCormick, Editor Gerould Kern, Managing Editor Jane Hirt and Associate Editor Joycelyn Winnecke.

EXPAT, you could have had 21 separate posts there if you had continued. Come on, man, it's a contest. BTW, what makes a song gay?

Hehehe...wrong with me? Take a look at who has the most posts today. You'd flip flop too if it meant that you were going to win!

Oh my gosh! Donald must be so embarrassed!

Does that mean that the bikini boys are on the beach?

I have read elsewhere that they get paid $5 a review. People like Harriet Klausner, who posts multiple times a week. I wrote her once and she insisted that a) she is a real person, and (letter after a*) she does read the books she reviews. Hard to believe the latter. Her reviews mainly summarize the plot. Try typing the letter B followed by a parenthesis. Okay, here is what it comes out:

EXPAT, I am glad to know that we agree here. Would you please post a pic of Jeremy Irvine's ass? Thanks.

How could that be since bill collectors are always ready and willing to discuss it? And do the 3 word posts above count in the contest? I can top them: Very interesting, for sure!

May I ask what is the Huffington Post? Some kind of road marker?

I have...with mixed success. The bf has, and likes it. It can help you relax, so that might be good for sleep.

I don't even think of such things. Johny Weir probably wears ice skates to bed, that's all I think.