Riobard

Mea culpa. I figured it out. I qualify for upgrade if I remember to strategize. But then lose my 6ft horizontal sleeper in otherwise shitty econ. Must never have been domestic stock. Can sleep prone, hammered, or head hammered.

Any clarification about the wi-fi question? It now seems you can use the house connection. Q: you can get a robust local signal with your roaming? Yes or No. I think it is No, but want to be informed.

IMO 50% are below average ... consistent with universal law. Just like P-town T-dance a lifetime ago. But no place for those with a week to live.

It's usually more pragmatic than sexual a preference by receptives with dainty virginal holes.

How can I determine my Copa status? I use Aeroplan for Air Canada and Copa , but fly Copa way more and that is where my points load up. They are both Star Alliance airlines. Is your Copa plat centralized with Star Alliance? Do I need to do some special registration with Copa? Maybe you are high user United and that boosts you?

My side of the debate was not a disagreement. It was a description of reality and self-determination through my fields of vision and life philosophy. I would be OK, for shits and giggles, with arguing Solacesoul's side Floridarob sees what I see on our landlubber cruises, and does what some others do. To clarify, I don't don my tux for fucks. But I AM what I wear, so my tropical weather seer/sucker fits in to a T.

I find the phone service top-notch BUT what I and a few other people have discovered is that their automated itinerary change email alerts suck. They often do not inform you. I usually check the booked itinerary periodically, going into both "manage" and a quick mock replication. Sounds like a pain ... it is ... but I have few airline options.

Thanx Sandunes ... will stick with caipirinhas, hard pass on Manhattans, for now. Though a little softened by the one-hour perk. I usually go for 60-70 minute trysts in bordels and 'love hotels', longer at home there. Your appraisal was fair and balanced. Now then, how could this work if it turns out critical mass not reached with consumers who go for the exisitng type there? The price structure is attractive. Perhaps a smaller number of garotos with sufficient niche appeal to keep the rooms more consistently occupied with a smaller number of clients willing to get down to business. Low admission take compensated by higher room-rent turnover for the house and, for garotos, improved earning:time ratio ... more down and dirty time yet less down'n'dead time.

Don't be daft ... the four studs carrying his litter- chair will walk on their knees, that are calloused anyway

Royal "we"? Isn't there room for both genital size fetish and delight in unwrapping? Mummy and Daddy didn't gift-wrap my annual seasonal hockey stick, but the puck was in festive tissue cuz it could. Always uplifting. Who is Pence? (I realize you're tongue-in-cheek) Is there a thread where you describe your experiences in Brasil?

Yeah, I forgot to add that the fare is disproportionately higher for the shorter NoAmer leg. That is what has gone up. So Panama and southwards cheaper. Walker, I reserve exit row 17 or 18 ... about 75% of the time nail a 3-seater and literally bed down with the middle seat-belt fastened. Just mastered a few pertinent emergency role lines in Spanish and Portuguese for points south. They just started an advanced reserve premium charge but if you change your seat at checkin to those rows it is not charged to you. Note exit row 17 seats do not recline, you just get the legroom. I usually do 18 aisle.

I respect that the towel etiquette is normative in NoAmer and European baths. Always abided in the day. One of the first things that struck me in Brasil was the custom alteration (towards flex) in those settings. Catechism teacher asks what makes the Pope infallible, kid answers "so who's to stop him?" I do not need to come close to infallibility assertion at 117.

This is articulate, to be sure, but sitting in my pad here, this assertion is frankly unhinged. Where I see other customers, logging now 9 months cumulative access to the venues, clothing is optional and NOT non-normative. Maybe you have vision-filtering that categorically divides between your desired attire and Emperors who have no clothes. But I witness both sides of the clothing optional spectrum. Everyone there knows it and thinks it is copacetic ... erm, almost everyone. Let us depict accuracy for readers prospectively visiting.

Only behaviour is ugly or not. Physicality is all unugly with a gradient or degrees of unugly ... no binary.

Sodomy decriminalization is secure. Was just an example of what M2M commercial sex is up against legally, attitudes and what not. It might help if we neutralized our terms to dissociate from the male-female commercial sex spectrum. Eg, Our hires are, simply, "men". More than straight men, we (myself included) excitedly use reference terms that highlight the physiological aspects of intimacy surrogacy. We might consider altering our language choices so they sound less objectifying and genitally focused. These habits only perpetuate being dumped into the same soup as commercial sex at large.

"Thou shalt wear a towel" and "you are strictly in a sauna environment because I say that is the place you are in" are briefly worded dictates. They are simple admonishments on the face of it. Anyone who thinks they are not bossy in tone is 'simply stupid', to use language that is relatable here (not my personal choice). This is reminiscent of dictates here about price fixing. Too many crossing guards. I could not unpack the rationale of these apparently inflexible rulings but tried to deconstruct and describe what lies behind my point of view on the subject. OK, let's put an end to the psychological warfare that emerged, certainly not my intention. Truce, dude(s). We can all stay in the dark about stretching our mutual comprehension efforts. Pissers tucked away ... contest done and dusted. So now: I go to one-of-a-kind bathhouses in Brasil. They are not, dare I say, bordellos. I do not enter the steam or sauna but I am symbolically in an environment that I (for my own good) term a sauna, also for the sake of harmony. I would sauna Finnish off the mandatory ritual and demonstrate meek compliance, exchanging my clothing for a towel or stylish panties, than incur the disapproval of my sauna peers. Erm ... I promise to keep in line with my towel or undies and will happily be subject to inspection in this regard. Though my footwear does not get wet and I use orthotics, I will wear flip-flops so as not to deviate from the required sauna uniform. Though I am not de facto in a sauna ... I will take the hit and behave according to essentially being de jure in a sauna. Sidenote: I like oatmeal cookies and hot cocoa before being tucked into bed. A simply stated preference. If out of cookie stock, I like the crust cut off my sammich. Order in the world will now, it is intended, be restored. Latbear, you have been served manifest notice. I hope you can adapt and not be one of the missing.

Good idea. I connect in Panama most of the time. USD currency involves stop-loss planning but sights are do-able in a short time. The fly in the appointment: quality is OK but fare prices have inflated far more than other airlines I use.

Or be up that early!

I question the lineup you could recruit over a week away, likeohmygod. Solo Caribbean vacations can be isolating if you land in a sex-arid zone. You are clever and have already likely thought about it, but a local sugarbaby tagging along, perhaps? I can think of a few candidates for myself that I would happily take to, say, Mexico. Of the genre you describe.

Kkkkk ... it really should be clothing optional, for many reasons. But to clarify, fee structure varies according to in situ attire, in my experience. Clothing is partially and subtly associated with availability and intent aspects of communication, on both client and provider side. If you do not think those factors seep into exchange negotiation we might not be frequenting the same places. I am not attempting to endorse any particular experimentation, but how behaviour patterns evolve is typically related to perceived subjective reward. Sometimes the reinforcement is quantifiable. That is usually a requirement for sustaining my own choices. I have done both towel and streetclothes in bordels, eventually settling on the latter. Further, the dressed garoto upticks appeal for me. My own simplistic clothing projects a tad ambivalence while as wearer I salaciously or diffidently (who cares which) signal interest through other levels of presentation. This all happens very quickly so as not to squander time for whom the clock is important. There are other eroticized aspects of attire on either side that escalate my excitement, nothing to do with garment fetishism. I like the prospect to tease me through and under conventional fabric barriers and I like to discover him through a bit of archeological excavation. I like us both to work a little and build up to the main course, with broad yet pragmatic distance between starting blocks and finish line. If you think this is quirky, realize we have all done the same outside of the 117-type setting. And of course, the choreography can help substitute for limits imposed by language proficiency. Unless creatively replicating the dance of the 7 veils, towel removal is a split-second strip. Why the rush? There is already enough push for the Gatorade, rinse, suck and fuck routine without totally having to capitulate to sterile cookie-cutter experiences. What floats your boat may be a big yawn for me and vice versa. But I would never summarily dismiss your preference to look like you just emerged from the shower, especially if it has utility beyond convenience and conformism. I suspect it doesn't. The sole thing in common with the footballer referenced is a single 7-letter R name. Latbear posed the question. I sense he got more than he bargained for. Bottom line: no restriction or inadequate rationale for either style choice. If you still fail to grasp why clothing can add an edge at the personal level, no explanation possible. Not for lack of trying.

Kkkkkk ... when you tire of the unicorn, what species next? I am stumped.

A ruling in T&T on recently challenged anal sex criminalization (illegal though rarely enforced, any 2 people either gender) comes down in a few days.

Enjoy Iguaçu! Lovely.

Yes, in several Caribbean nations. But be grateful living in the western world. Also reflected in highly disproportionate STI rates. Just be careful. Maybe consider Dominican Republic to avoid the legal risks.