Riobard

Just added Brussels Sprouts to my shopping list.

This analysis is out of Quebec. I had hoped to read it but there is a paywall. I have personally conducted PCA statistical techniques in my own research. Speaking of Quebec, I have personally experienced a handful (teehee) of two successive orgasms (mine) in lap dances, past middle age. The lapse duration was brief, a few minutes, and circumvented both reduction/ absence/ waning of erection and typical refractory period manifestation. The stim did not mimic squeeze technique that may have suppressed the robustness and completion of the initial ejaculation, where in a sense subsequent orgasm might represent residual ejaculation potential left in the tank. The dancers in these isolated cases were insanely hot and did not truncate the exchange immediately following first orgasm; indeed, more songs more paycheque. It felt like starting over, immediate déjà vu. I interpreted it as profound arousal overriding the usual pattern of single orgasm. It accounts for a minuscule fraction of lifetime orgasms. If the background song was Do That To Me One More Time, thank you Captain & Tennille.

Nobody less gullible asking can’t you just make do?

The original question is loaded with multiple supplementary questions: Is erection sustainable following orgasm? -> Yes, erection-facilitating biochemicals operate alongside erection-neutralizing biochemicals. The latter usually override the former, as in steady state balance for most of our time and in sexual activity post-resolution, but the opposite is possible if desire and both physical and psychological stimulation override the latter, even without artificial PDE5 inhibition. In fact, we know that suppressing erection-neutralizing PDE5 may lead to problematic priapism that can persist well past the length of time that an erection may be sustained out of a natural motivation and desire for it. Is orgasm without erection possible? -> Yes, some men ejaculate without the tumescence that they would prefer but that alludes them. Other men (rarely) idiosyncratically prefer non-erect orgasm because they incidentally experienced orgasm, usually when young, albeit with desire a motivating factor yet without a phobia of erection, and became habituated to it. They may run into problems if and when it is expedient for orgasm to occur with erection, as in intercourse and/or natural reproductive goals. [As flaccid state is the primary physiological characteristic of refractory period, the notion that refractory period is categorically devoid of profound subjective arousal beyond cognitive motivation is, therefore, overly simplistic.] Is erection possible without subjective desire? -> Yes, of course. Is orgasm possible without subjective desire? -> Yes, of course. Is orgasm possible without subjective arousal? -> Yes, of course. Is orgasm possible without a typical refractory period inclusive of non-erection and apparent resolution and satiation? -> Yes. It seems to be rare; is poorly understood and has received little research attention; and the orgasms may be heterogeneous, that is, they may subjectively feel the same or similar within a sequence, but may differ across physiological and hormonal dimensions. By analogy, the bullets of multiple orgasm may differ among themselves when clustered in the chamber more than one single bullet differs from the next one in a single-orgasm sequence with typical refractory period. There is probably neither any strategic “trick” to accessing them nor use in pursuing them.

In that shortened time one must speak Irish much more quickly.

When asked about what refractory period I could anticipate the Thai trainer stud in Bangkok started sets of one-hand pushups to demonstrate, but looked at me suspiciously and with reservation when I suggested I lay across his back.

I thought it was “reload”, but who cares what it’s named? I’ll happily subscribe to each issue of the magazine.

He just needs a few luxurious soaks in the chocolate factory vats.

They seem to be up to date in posting events and there may have been some changes/additions to the usual Sunday afternoons. https://www.instagram.com/boatecasagrandeoficialboate?igsh=MTdvYmliN2Y2dnZzZg==

Abandoned building in a mostly inhabited town, obviously not up to code. If it’s the polished balcony in the photo there’s a car flying close to it. Georgian residing in Greece, I believe. Reckless. Sad. The riverbed is dry outside of rainy season.

Paris did melt away in the narrative and couldn’t hold a candle to a full Montague.

It’s usually a derogatory term applied to women, such as “she’s beautiful everywhere but her face”. Not a metaphor utilizing a dairy product. I’d have no problem putting my butt on his face. It could be the default position because a two-choice dilemma of butt or face is a pointless entry.

Right, the area within which this unfortunate incident took place does look “forest-y”. It seems to be situated within, bounded by, a fairly developed area. An unusual extended pattern of one or more barking domestic dogs apparently figured somewhat in alerting a local that something was amiss. As I wrote previously, I read the word ‘grove’ in one piece and ‘forest’ in another. I think, however, that a grove may be a few acres but would be lacking the extent of underbrush and other vegetation bridging the distance between the taller trees as seen in the images. An addition to the thread less tangential than has already occurred might be the nomenclature of a cake named after a wooded area that has a cherry orchard, cacao trees, and a cow pasture situated within it. Attached are perpendicular vantage points at one corner of the space.

This surprises me somewhat, as I view you as objective and fair. I did not see the member’s post as a comment about duration of membership somehow quantifying opinion merit. Seniority is not a valid chatroom construct. I saw it as a reaction to the temerity of a member with an undeveloped grasp of the board’s code of conduct. Surely by the two year mark it is understood that you don’t utilize knowledge of somebody’s personal information, however obtained, in plotting and urging the board as a collective to sabotage a member’s livelihood, however dramatic a difference in world view associated with the explicit scheming. I would be blowing my lid off, spitting tacks, and I have no objection to any less than ideal phrasing the recipient of the threat may have employed. Nobody should be backed into the position of rebuttal against the type of intimidation that a miscreant gratuitously introduced. Let’s please be clear about who is behaving poorly and is snubbing his nose at anybody calling him out as if he alone possesses impunity.

But an additional $2,000 for the stripper’s half-hour attendance to leap up out of the cake and sensually cleanse off buttercream and fondant in the makeshift shower.

72 hours is the standard industry cooling off period for the average Bridezilla’s venting of angst and traumatic issues that often have a way of working out without said planner’s 24/7 on-call intervention.

Yeah, I was looking as well. The road identified is Thep Prasit Alley 9, spanning south from the top red bubble and west to the lower red bubble. Plentiful vegetation, denser on the south side where you pinned the bubble where the road veers west, and exactly where the motorcycle rental outlet is depicted in the news-issued CCTV photo released.

Could that mean when we were getting under adults’ feet as children in the far north and our elders said “go play in the bush a spell” it was intended as a patch of nature contiguous with the property and wasn’t truly negligent parenting? This would upend the narrative.

A few local newscasts termed the site a wooded grove, a far cry from, say, the northern boreal. Probably an unintended artefact of the language translation process.

Relax. It was over before it started.😉 And coming from somebody lugging a yalta truckloads of oxygen tanks into the political chattlefield? I can’t activate my camping gas stove pilot light with my phone on without exploding the maple sugar shack. LOL.

Au contraire. Neither is a qualifier that could be described or modifiable as either singular or plural.

Wrong. Viz introduces a specific multilayered entity, the historical context of disagreement upon which a flimsy malevolent suggestion was predicated by a board troll, troll behaviour not unlike your obvious sad misanthropic attempt at provocation, because you have little otherwise worthwhile to go on. Viz modules of English language including the version where “something sucks” is a dangling statement.

Could you possibly be referring to a childish annihilation fantasy?

It’s advisable to delineate your name consistently. If your passport includes a middle name, for example, ensure it is represented on your travel document and financial statement, all three versions aligned. I took care of this early on because there can be a delay between modification and what appears on the document needed for submission. An inconsistency might not pose an impediment to finalization but VFS Global has emphasized this aspect and indicated it is one reason that some applications are stalled in limbo. Don’t worry if an actual debit or credit card is not yet updated to conform to the document. I believe, as well, that the consular adjudication step may be more oriented to the culture of lengthier and consistent name designation than incentivized to let one slip through. That said, at a Canadian airline check-in this decade I was pulled aside for vetting, prior to security clearance, at a separate desk because my passport middle name was not reflected on my flight ticket, associated loyalty points registration, or vaccination document I had in hand.

Yes, some positions seem so contrarian and incredulous as to defy logic. They may tend to stimulate surprise and rancour much more than influence real world outcomes. You have amplified my point by missing the point. It was illogical to opine that someone whose logic escapes you in one matter, however legitimate your perspective in that subject topic, had put forward a defence regarding such logic based on unrelated activities that suggest a win for the overall good of an unrelated constituency. Enjoy your vintage, in enough moderation so as to stay on track. Insinuating that I categorically dismiss, in gaslight fashion, your point of view viz a controversial matter within the domain of a third party’s obnoxious attempt at judge jury executioner status regarding that particular theme, is simply additional manipulative spin. I am on the side of objective logical debate.