Riobard

The Patpong mayoralty is yours to lose.

All excellent points, @macaroni21. Do you think there is any legal prohibition to a VIP area with lapdance options? That format is the usual playbook for female stripper bars elsewhere and the general guidance for male entertainer equivalence. I just don’t know all the rules there in spite of substantial exposure to Patpong, but I assume the model that we mutually propose is all above board.

I don’t think you mean sex control freaks. There’s a long wait list here for that group, reluctant to experiment with relinquished rigidity.

However put, yours is the excellent foppery of the world.

IDK, my turnover rate may not always be at the top end but is fairly consistently high and the sign of a good employee. And of course only myself to blame.

In other words, they are persons, you respect their humanity and good experiences are the yield. Some punters are better suited to the blow-up doll a delivery guy reliably drops off at an invariant charge. And sticking to day jobs rather than prosecuting your self-determination.

Speak for yourself when aggrieved. I don’t respect or value arrogant assertions of representation. In contrast to your snivelling on behalf of the herd, I understand everything there is to know about you. I just have to watch the news for parallels. The only receipt you have is your flimsy criticism and that of a handful of cronies in your corner. As long as you’re giving notes, I will say something inarguably speaking for myself. It would be easier to navigate this board without the daily hammering of random articles from a handful of nation-specific news outlets. I find the majority of them not relatable to what I perceive the board’s main agenda. Who’s to stop you? Nobody. But speaking for myself, the experience is one of cluttered spam. Like I said, my take is irrefutable. The only rebuttal could be: how could you not appreciate something you said you don’t? Perhaps you could wrap your brain around the holes in the idea that when you say nobody it means everybody when in fact it refers to you and your futile attempt to shape the narrative. I doubt that a steady influx of, say, Brazil-centric news articles would generate much attention. It would just add to the lopsided tone of the general subforum you monopolize. Show me the polls SVP. I reiterate, read the room seeing as you are a reader. Your offerings within your favourite locale would be better suited to a board Club option thematically geared to the Thaiger, etc, ad infinitum re: English language material mirroring what news everybody accesses anyway or is simply extremely locally centred. Alternatively, you could just recommend that readers subscribe to their favourite news outlets. Or a subforum on Thai linked articles I won’t waste time on sifting through. I’d add “You do you”, but you may grasp your own rigidity seeing as how prone you are to project it. If you can do that selectively according to your basic needs perhaps conscientious attention to newslink selectivity could ensue. Thanks for the laughs, though.

IMO Moonlight is the least pedestrian of a generally poor showing over the better part of a high season month’s visit. To each his own, and my bias is driven by 48 years of strip club interfacing, I do grasp the appeal of a night out in a club atmosphere, but erotic payoffs in BKK seemed better and more naturalistic when arranged to occur in private settings. As interesting posters like @macaroni21have pointed out … apologies if I have distorted here … the clubs could inflate appeal more broadly with hotter guys than currently exist giving private lap dances and not necessarily obligated to execute more advanced sexual interaction. They could conceivably be selective in going further with clients based on their appraisal of match-ability.

Better yet, don’t be in a position where a firewall is the one flimsy thing making the difference between freedom and the hole.

That is not at all alleged. He is faced with the very serious charge of possession and reciprocal transmission of child pornography. Child sexual abuse is not fetishistic. Children are not inanimate. Obscene fetishism is an oxymoron. The exploitation behind the porn clinically reflects enacted pedophilia if pedophilia underpins true subjective arousal. It is plausible in many cases that illicit content, notwithstanding its heinous nature, exists to pander to a follower base more accurately meeting the diagnostic criteria of pedophilia. Wouid it be too much to ask folks to comprehend what they are understandably reactive about? That said, the syndrome of pedophilia itself is not an offence. The ‘Daddy’ scene is legal and acceptable insofar as it is a play on human developmental differential. Unfortunately it’s the thin edge of a wedge potentially leading to loss of bearings particularly where money is involved and it intersects with large and follower niche subpopulations wherein demographic pedophilic representation inevitably exists. More in keeping with the balanced part of your viewpoint, being a dumb, selfish, greedy lug doesn’t make anyone a person with pedophilia. It may be arguably worse than pedophilia but it’s not pedophilia unless it is. Such a diagnostic formulation wouid only occur in the context of an individual seeking paraphilia assessment and/or treatment.

What does this have to do with the subject of child sexual abuse other than that perps similarly sing it?

For many that’s less important than seeking attention with fake news, but you know that.

No framing necessary. The FBI works on a longitudinal pyramid model, inducting where possible each person charged to informant status for a large percentage downward variance on punishment, each truly culpable fool interlocked with the one before and after in sequence and spurring probable cause. It’s a solid example of the HumanCentiPad trend. You see what patterns occur in the actual offence realm replicated in media-generated public opinion. For my part, I try my best not to swallow the smoking overblown drivel emitted from anuses. Others are keen to have their lips surgically stitched to others’ rectums for a sense of belonging and sympatico.

This is ridiculously speculative and inflammatory. You have no receipts that support the notion that illicit porn figured prominently in the subject’s actual arousal template.

The Wolf & The One sidebar: Is it just me that has picked up on it, but are there not a few punters here that cried a river deeper than the Chao Phraya over a bar/brothel shuttered over child prostitution, anxiously waited with bated breath with offerings and prayer for it’s revivification, then encourage flocking to its reincarnation with Baht clutched in fists to help resuscitate it. No insistence on an accounting, explanation, apology, forward-looking statement on values, trade vetting, etc.

Hold your roll, Clarice. Wasn’t there a poster here a while back that arrogantly disparaged layperson jury trials? This. You just buttressed that person’s point. I suppose it could have been you because it has the flavour of something you would say and then personally exemplify it …. Naw, it was you, a slam dunk for Judy. I hate to admit much commonality with your wonky perspectives in general, and you don’t track them well for coherence and consistency, but I’m now more on side than ever with that particular one. On the bright side for you, you want to be noticed and y’are.

Says the guy that deems a globally beloved sport played by all genders and all ages as tantric-grade. That ridiculous little passage evoked cringe not sensuality. But try workshopping it on a playing field and see how that plays out. The terms ‘own goal’, ‘red card’ come to mind.

Yep, exactly how I imagine the mayhem of the way a troll and wannabe influencer comes. This could help:

No. Better to be priggish than getting into the weeds on autonomy.

The win is attributable to a teenager. Prepubescent kids accompany the players to the field. Think things through, guys; it helps keep creepiness in check and Clarice from a warranted knocking on your door. You don’t have to be prurient about everything.

For reals? That’s just absurd. Usually a thing that is … is just what it is. But thanks for the shudders.

Get help. And I’m not referring to the complex spectrum of unprotected intercourse legitimacy.

Enter pinned solution here:

OMG, FINALLY, a single correct answer. Por favor, can it just be pinned?