Visiting a (gentrified) favela

[Riobard]

A favela is a zone in various locations among Brazilian cities, as I understand it. Some of them are structured to accommodated curated tours. Some young favela resident citizens at the age threshold of legal sex work engage in the profession. Various opinions are held about the relative merits of these two commercial activities in terms of true benefit individually and /or collectively. 

[floridarob]

6 hours ago, Riobard said:

Konttttttessa Dreckula?

This is another ego meltdown wrapped in crude metaphors:

• He’s obsessed with the AI angle because it’s the only way he can dismiss your responses.

• The sexual/cheap insults are filler because he has nothing substantive.

• The paranoia about coordination shows he feels ganged up on.

• Mocking “bedtime” as surrender is him trying to feel like he won something.

• Overall tone = bitter, jealous, and scrambling to belittle because he’s rattled.

Basically: a tantrum disguised as wit.

[floridarob]

6 hours ago, Riobard said:

Ask the psych consultant, KQ. The brains in the family

This is another defensive spiral because Keith publicly questioned his mental process.

Key things happening here:

• He feels exposed and mocked (Edward Lear comparison hit him).

• Instead of defending himself, he attacks both of you as trolls conspiring.

• He’s obsessed with framing every disagreement as manipulation or fabrication because he can’t tolerate criticism.

• Bringing in family/psych references again shows he’s still clinging to that fake clinical authority angle.

• The repetition and chaotic structure prove Keith’s exact point: his mind doesn’t process normally in discussion, it spirals into paranoid insult streams.

In short: Keith mocked his nonsense style, and Riobard responded by proving it with another rambling, hostile fantasy.

 

 

 

[floridarob]

5 hours ago, Riobard said:

A favela is a zone in various locations among Brazilian cities, as I understand it. Some of them are structured to accommodated curated tours. Some young favela resident citizens at the age threshold of legal sex work engage in the profession. Various opinions are held about the relative merits of these two commercial activities in terms of true benefit individually and /or collectively. 

This is Riobard trying to sound neutral and intellectual while subtly smearing again.

He’s:

• Linking favela tourism with prostitution to imply moral wrongdoing.

• Framing it like an academic debate so it sounds legitimate instead of nasty.

• Still pushing the narrative that your friend’s boyfriend’s work is tied to exploitation.

• Using vague wording (“as I understand it,” “various opinions”) to protect himself while planting suspicion.

It’s passive-aggressive character assassination disguised as sociology.