Guest StevenDraker Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 A TSA employee living near Sacramento, Calif. is facing underage sex charges after FBI agents posing as a woman and her teenage daughter caught him in a Craigslist sting. The Placer County Sheriff's Department says investigators spotted a Casual Encounters ad last month that sought sex with a mother-daughter duo. They involved the FBI, who exchanged emails with the poster, 54-year-old TSA worker George Hristovski. "Maybe you are a mother with a younger daughter who is interested in finding a man to teach your daughter. A man to show your daughter what your daddy showed you," part of the ad read, according to the criminal complaint against him. A female agent responded to the ad, playing the role of the "mom," the San Francisco Chroniclereports. She traded photos and personal information with Hristovski until eventually, the FBI says, he asked for the email address of her fictional 13-year-old daughter. According to the FBI, Hristovski asked the "daughter" for photos and sexual information, which gave them enough evidence to raid his home. The FBI says Hristovski told them that his conversation with the supposed 13-year-old was "just a fantasy," and if the girl had actually sent him any photos, he would have reported her mom to law enforcement for letting that happen. The FBI also connected Hristovski's email address to a number of other sexual Craigslist postings from 2009, some of which were posted from Department of Homeland Security IP addresses. His LinkedIn page, which uses the same photo he allegedly sent to agents during the sting, lists him as an inspector with DHS, and a former airline security agent. Hristovski has been charged with attempted production of child pornography and attempted enticement of a minor, the Chronicle reports, and the TSA has suspended him and started the process of firing him. source: http://gawker.com/tsa-inspector-arrested-in-craigslist-underage-sex-sting-1618371535 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JKane Posted August 10, 2014 Members Share Posted August 10, 2014 Do you have ANY point whatsoever? A despicable man gets busted for trying to arrange sex with an underage girl, regardless of source how does this have any bearing on GAY MALE escort discussion? Oooooh if I lump you all in with straight pedophiles, disregarding all reason, I can show you how incredibly dangerous Craigslist is!!! So instead hire this tired old pro--because the promise of your safety (against an all but non-existent danger) is the only positive I can offer! AdamSmith and boiworship 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Do you have ANY point whatsoever? A despicable man gets busted for trying to arrange sex with an underage girl, regardless of source how does this have any bearing on GAY MALE escort discussion? Thanks for articulating my original reply to Steven's post better than I did. TotallyOz and JKane 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 My main concern in all of this is the lengths that police are allowed to lie and entice and coerce men to meet up. I'll be the first to say that being in the legal profession for a few years that the only people that lie more than lawyers is police and they are not only allowed to lie but it is encouraged. I do not full the full case that is in this original post and I agree that this has nothing to do with male escorts or even gay sex, it is a scary thing that police are allowed to go to this extreme. IMHO Also, it is my firm belief that if we legalize prostitution and encourage everyone to enjoy sex that crimes against children will decrease tremendously. Yeah, I know none of that was mentioned in the article posted but it was on my mind. boiworship 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsGuy Posted August 11, 2014 Members Share Posted August 11, 2014 Thanks for articulating my original reply to Steven's post better than I did. HA! I was right! MsGuy: "AS may have been making a subtle indirect comment on the OP..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JKane Posted August 11, 2014 Members Share Posted August 11, 2014 My main concern in all of this is the lengths that police are allowed to lie and entice and coerce men to meet up. I'll be the first to say that being in the legal profession for a few years that the only people that lie more than lawyers is police and they are not only allowed to lie but it is encouraged. Agreed, which is why on my post about managing dangers of CL I STRONGLY ADVISE that one RUNS the other way when any additional gotcha is even implied (i.e. underage, drugs, public sex), because cops are also lazy and want to pin multiple counts on people instead of just a minor prostitution count. Again, this goes for any form of escorting from any source, not just CL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 I STRONGLY ADVISE ... Are you going to bail them out too? Thank you for the "free" advice though. Talk is cheap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Talk is cheap. That much is certain. JKane and Oz directly engaged with your points and provided substantive response. It would advance the values you extol for message forums to see you respond in the same manner. JKane and MsGuy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 So instead hire this tired old pro--because the promise of your safety (against an all but non-existent danger) is the only positive I can offer! ATTACK THE ISSUE, NOT THE POSTER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members boiworship Posted August 11, 2014 Members Share Posted August 11, 2014 ATTACK THE ISSUE, NOT THE POSTER. Daddy's is back up now. They miss you over there and covet your commentary. JKane 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Daddy's is back up now. They miss you over there "Over there"? Are you building fences or trying to control the Internet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Are you going to bail them out too? Thank you for the "free" advice though. Talk is cheap. He gave pretty good free advice. It was cheap as it was free. But, if you avoid taking all free advice you may find yourself up shit creek without a paddle. If you read his post, tell me which part you disagreed with or were you just trying to egg someone on to get into a pissing contest and then cry wolf? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Who is "Michael"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 And most importantly in what the personal attack in post #2 has to do with constructive criticism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Michael is a name I use on all other boards. I use TotallyOz only on this site. Sometimes I log in with Michael as I did today to see the new design of the site. The admin told me it was only visible under a few screen names and he asked me to look at it. I logged in to see the new design but forgot to log out when I posted. As I don't want to get names confused, I deleted Michael's post and copied exactly as I had originally posted. I hope this helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Yes, it was very helpful. Thank you. In what the personal attack in post #2 has to do with constructive criticism and with the spirit of the thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Yes, it was very helpful. Thank you. In what the personal attack in post #2 has to do with constructive criticism and with the spirit of the thread? Not sure, what does: "Talk is cheap" have to do with constructive criticism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevenDraker Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 TotallyOz, When you allow name calling and someone to be disparaging towards the profession you clearly set up the tone for your message board. That's all I needed to know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 TotallyOz, When you allow name calling and someone to be disparaging towards the profession you clearly set up the tone for your message board. That's all I needed to know. Excellent. Have a good life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Thread closed. Thank you all for participating. Moved to Sandbox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
