Riobard

A break for Cal commercial sex workers. Condom possession alone had been incriminatory. Imagine the convoluted thinking that took so long to shift ... the necessitated default of barebacking would decrease prostitution.

We, here, should and can do, regarding the language terms at issue. Evangelista, Wintour, Abundance, and Ferocity are sufficiently unified houses. What we should not do, as a rule, is equate AYOR reminders and healthy inquiry and debate with toxic. Even if it appears conflictual. A rightful platitude of courtesy goes no distance in disabusing the outside societal gaze's misconstrued interpretations. The thread overall has influenced my thinking and content going forward. The spiciness not unlike smallpox variolation, particularly if it turns out beneficial for even a mere handful, but that concept is perhaps best inserted into a Deadwood episode script. It was, therefore, serendipitous that the new member happened to use terms frequently employed here, and for which there may be an increased trend for commentary. He asked neither for critique nor caped crusaders. Per diem volume is a worthwhile topic though I have yet to find it personally relatable. Suum cuique. Do and write what you like. Free cou ... well, Some free countries. Others less so.

But in the Prague 'cute boys' thread we just now have an orgy poster "Boys Party Hard" depicting old and very young males figuratively in flagrante delicto according to the image ... not literally as the age is likely vetted. However, it is "exclusively bareback" so condom possession is not a liability. :-J Why flaunt, however innocent the intent? Grand jury not dismissed.

And up until 5 days ago in California you could be cuffed and tossed into the paddywagon for being in the wrong place at the wrong time while having a condom in your possession ... by that I do not mean a coke-filled rubber up your hole.

Word.

Note that i wrote "variables or arbitrary binaries on a gradient". Meaning that some of the relevant constructs are 2-side categorical and yet there may be a continuum of meaning for some variables. For example, a high-end callgirl's ad broker and an inbound port storage container broker might be clumped together. A binary such as indictment vs summary prosecution may also be applied to a 2-plus continuum. BTW, I do believe there is currently low consensus on gender as a binary. Please try not to get too caught up in the nomenclature. Arbitrary is relevant because there is lacking complete and consistently accepted reason behind certain aspects of the law, in tandem with the peremptory application of authority that is driven by public opinion with inadequate capacity to interpret the available body of related research, and in many cases it is a challenge to define a constant of specified value. Get all that, Rob?

Here's a weird word observation. "Loquacious" has a variety of both neutral and pejorative meanings. Its anyonym ... reticent, reserved or uncommunicative, etc ... also holds a range of neutral and derogatory meanings. Thus, being one and not the other, either way, places the labelled in a paradoxical bind of being cast in a negative light. SS, you may be even more deviously and intelligently manipulative, for innocent shits and giggles of course, than I have given you credit for. LOL.

Agree. That is why I specifically referred to the topic label on its own, to ilustrate the sometimes ridiculousness of attempts at plausible deniability. The advanced-level intellectual arguments are compelling and valiant, but not hitting the mark as they should. Tossing in a few qualitatively different narratives is not meant to detract simply because they may compete for attention spans and the tasks of knitting together various ideas. The court of public opinion is one of the main legislative drivers. It is much more likely to conflate "boytoy" with "child" in the male-sex-with-male context because gay sex is conflated with paedophilia. We can thank NAMBLA for reinforcing that construct. "Callgirl", for example in contrast, is likely to evoke images of Klute or Stormy Daniels over those of Iris in Taxi Driver or the gender equivalent of the typical "twink" many homosexual men go gaga over because secondary sex characteristics other than fully developmetally dropped gonads are anathema according to the arousal templates of some (not all). Public opinion and values will influence "cherrypicking" exploration beneath the tip of the iceberg of any heading.

Here is a true example of pretending to not understand: Gee, Officer Krupke, The OP's question as it stands alone, based on the topic heading, pertains to how many same-gender children were carried and birthed by any one reader participating in the forum. One would expect that what would ensue would be a vigorous discussion on multiple births and the polyzygotic anomaly and rarity of the Dionne quintuplets. Somehow it got derailed into a review of the legitimacy of using a term loosely that might be taken out of context. Officer, did you not realize that the burden of discerning the literal from the figurative falls on you. As for your radio transmission about a guy seriously clocking another here on the scene, I surely hope that you will take the time to rule out that this is not an everyday track-and-field event.

We are not quibbling, for example, about whether "I tapped that" means intercourse or getting someone's attention. We are discussing some central easily interpretable differentials based on age, trafficked or not, gender, degree of informed consent, and purchased or not via money or other utilities/considerations.

Love Paborn's example of fallacy in evaluation, the results bias, aka outcome bias. Mentally, many people approach good and bad outcome probabilities quite differently in terms of risk aversion and risk taking. Let's say the chance of scoring nicely (A) on El Conde any one set time, a "safe" evening hour, is 1% (.01) ... and equal to the chance of a bad encounter (B) wandering the comparatively deserted malecon beach at the witching hour. Not to confuse the two agendas. It is just a hypothetical. And contradicts the track record of more than a few here. Then apply a frequency variable to the 99:1 binary, let's say arbitrarily 50 ventures of each scenario over 8 weeks. Consecutive (A) failures (.99 per event) spur further attempts with increasing confidence that ill fortune has a shelf life and the .01 will not prevail but will bend towards gainful success with time and patience. Consecutive (B) escapes, in contrast, spur increasing confidence that the .01 will prevail and that one will emerge from one's whoring unscathed in spite of stacking the deck in the direction of a run-in. Age, race, colour blind. In actuality, the likelihood of a good (A) outcome or a bad (B) outcome is the same, 39% over 50 events. The "when" of 50 days will vary. This example is just the law of one. A reset for the (A) scenario, adding 50 more, is likely going to be experienced much as before, again with no major outcome surprise, but the same calculation [probability of at least one] applied to the cumulative total is 63% ... it is a curvilinear rather than straight line function. Similarly, the odds of the beach stroll running afoul when doubling frequency inflate to almost 2/3, but with perhaps an element of surprise at the illusion of invulnerability being disrupted. Hey, I realize that 1% in setting (A) is intolerable, and that the inclination would be a nightcap on the wrong side of town, but here is where it gets really fun. Impose the agenda of (A) to the (B) setting. Sexual desire further compounds the rationalization contradictions so that scoring is more expected than an assault, or worse.

Adam, I think the comparison is high, but you have put the variables or arbitrary binaries on a gradient ... eg, underage is worse, female is more vulnerable, trafficking is worse than consensual, skype is less creepy than motel, etc. Fair enough. There is some variation along these gradients or continua in terms of labelling of offense, prosecution pursuit, conviction, sentence, etc. However, the fine or incarceration outcomes are variable and we cannot assume a logical stratified set of consequences along the multiple continua. We cannot treat this as stealing a Swatch versus Rolex. Moreover, the rating of paradigm success to justify the law will likely hinge as much on high volume of "lesser" offenses as on occasional front-page-worthy splashy high-impact offenses. The ultimate aim is to reduce the purchase and sale of services by shifting the pressure from three domains (consumer, 3rd party beneficiary, seller) to the first two domains. It pays to catch on and catch up with strategic measures to reduce risk. They are not difficult. Legislation is usually crafted in clear enough terms to plan and behave below the threshold of culpability.

I like moderate as well, on top of which I am a shady guy whose derma provided a minor basal cell carcinoma alert. Fortunately the abrasion on my face left minimal scarring. Sure, there is sunscreen for skin and eyewear for glare, but my beach blanket bingo days are long past.

Yeah, I had extrapolated that ... just being editorially cranky. LOL.

Where was the CBS headline editor? Decapitated is dead. Should be "16 decapitated, death toll 73 (or 57?)" Prison visit-wise, beware losing your mind over your little head.

So a local strip up here IT IS RUMOURED charges, or perhaps a third party business does, site membership to view the dancers' stage and camroom shows. Members also can digitally tip (no pun intended) a specific performer. Technically, both aspects illegal since 2014. For the corporation and the consumer. However, it seems that you can pay a cover charge and enter the establishment for stage show viewing, all with impunity. Lap dance borderline allowable with no genital contact or simulated intercourse. You would need to be caught red-handed with the dancer's unmentionables exposed. "How many songs was that?" Not "how much do I owe you?" You can stage-show cash tip into the panties pulled down with the schlong an inch from your face. This is not to say onsite strip club raids have never historically occurred up here. They are a thing of the past and the evidentiary requirements were perhaps trickier to satisfy. The postmodern obsession with all things digital, and development/expansion thereof, was bound to spill over into the vice domain. Enormous related capital expenditures have to be justified. Punitive consequences may be a long shot, but one does not want to be on the losing end of the reverse lottery.

True that. A zebra on all fours is no less a predatorial gangbang target in the pen ... by that, I explicitly mean NOT a juvie detention facility, not pleasure from abuse, not the donation of alcohol swabs purchased from the commissary. LCL

I am so sold on SolaceSoul's ace and well-intentioned and non-censorial admonishments. I do not require hard evidence of prosecution and sentencing. This is not slipping out an expletive "motherf....r" at your home BBQ within earshot of your neighbour's backyard child, which is a morals offense in some jurisdictions. A personal disclaimer is timely for me: I interpret this Board/forum to be merely an acceptable erotic entertainment website. Any content beyond the legally acceptable parameters of decorum that I have posted has been fictional, big-talk bullshit, referred to trade only in the abstract colloquial comparative sense, no different from the trope of financial support based on nonegalitarian capacity within any conjugal interaction. All for joke value, shock value, to while away the ennui of too much free time, to try to impress, also partly out of an academic non-voyeuristic interest in the capacity for people to fabricate accounts of life experiences. I do not seriously take at face value anything written that might be misconstrued as condoning being a recipient of erotic favours in exchange for utilities. My behaviour here is no different from any acceptable fanciful fictitious account of an absolutely normative aspect of human nature. The Lady Chatterley's Lover playbook. Herein, the provisional deniability stamp forthwith delineated as LCL, not be confused with the ubiquitous LOL. LCL

I should point out that we do not communicate about compensation, I only offer them alcohol free beverage, it is not in a public environment where children and other vulnerables are privy to the behaviour, there is no sadomasochistic theme, there is no visible exposure of genitals, touching bulges is avoided at all costs, and all costs (not discussed anyway) are deferred because I am hot and they want to marry and support me by some other occupation so I do not live off the avails, etc. A splooge is simply an apparatus for washing and polishing multiple bathroom mirrors for an extended period of time. Orgasm and "getting there" is a grammatically nonsensical error. The dancer is a clothed ballet soloist I viewed at the opera house before going to the club where I go for a drink while stripping furniture for donation to a private charity. Sorry for the confusion.

Condom going into a-hole! No flys on U! LOL

Oh, circumference clarifies it. I thought it was stubby ... short and thick. I think what I was reacting to here was the Barnum&Bailey sideshow schlock-value flavour of the post. Mind you, we get that at the other pole here (pun intended) ... ie, the guy whose tool is so long that it bent in the small space before he went, very self-consciously of course, a few feet at high-velocity paintball-style. LOL. On reflection, you were simply sharing your fascination with a scientific rarity. That's cool.

I will getting to the point and got it out of the way, my dear boy. My pet peeve is guys puttings on there condom inside out.

Pauleiro ... LOL! Regarding Daniel, I knew you could do it so I wouldn't have to. You fell right into line!

Because you tend to be resourceful and flexible, not locked into structured commercial venues for play, and fluent, this itinerary could work well. The one seasonal holiday I stayed right through in Rio, the airbnb had given me a fantastic rate for about 75 of the days but apologetically indicated, convincingly, that they made ends meet by jacking up the price sixfold for 8 nights (also for Carnaval period). I elected to stay rather than cross the street for a more economical week at a luxe hotel for the duration semana Natal-Réveillon.