Riobard

And the SS, it fantasizes being sage mentor to its Hootown constituents, getting paid to behave as if they take it serially. Again how does one blend startle, mirthful, and lacrimose emoticons? LOL&CS (crying sympathetically)?

Still scratching my head on another thing. My apparent stereotyping (or failure to confront same) of sexual style, even if remotely grounded (it is not), is predicated on interaction in the trade context, and on my occasional accounts here based on a very small very niche subpopulation of mostly hetero performative men across a diversity of race/ethnicity. Acting all the components of intimacy. And furthermore, the indefatigable SS contributor sends up those he inaccurately accuses of buying into the sexual performance. So I am, according to his ludicrous assumptions, both getting reeled in by scorts and basing my sex-related assessments (his unfounded accusation) on the fake behaviours of hires. Only a moron or manipulator would reach for that level of non-substantial convoluted criticism ... cray cray, fellas, inn't it? This takes the cake and irrefutably meets the criteria of nutball troll. For those who have not yet notices. LOL. What a pill off his pills.

I attended Hahnemann for my training and found most Pennsylvanians to be hospitable, smart, and nice. I have otherwise only been schooled in Canada.

Readers, I know you may recommend disengagement from a forum member who often presents himself as somebody simply to be handled. I don't usually disagree, but at times it is too tempting and psychologically stimulating. Anyway, this example will pass, or the boredom going over the same themes will take over. I might point out as well that retirement has freed up 60 hours a week, so a very small fraction of that on his nonsense is, on balance, not a huge waste.

Now, let me guess, there will be a revisiting of my preliminary observations about Grand's El Conde social groupings. A thread in which racial insensitivity and stereotyping was manipulatively imputed to me. But wait, will it be social awkwardness, demented perception, I am too old and ugly to fit in, too fat, too thin, they don't make friends easily with newbies on the spectrum, I project discrimination, cloying Canuck politesse won't go over well, I am too cheap to buy a round of El Presidente, I will embarrass them by publicly guestimating their guests' length and girth, the grand SS (u know hoo) poohbah, doesn't like the maple leaf motif quilt patches packed, I am bound to get sad emoticons on posts, my loony bin minder blurts my day pass is up .... blah blah blah??? Waiting with baited breath the fake news new or tired download thumper spins. LOL, (Kevie, please don't comment )

Erratum: should be "triangulated". Aside, summun fantastizes bout me strangulated. How do you synthesize sad and laughing emoticons?

Momma said (not her invention): Patience is a virtue.

You are either manipulative or do not track threads well. I am losing my patience for giving the benefit of the doubt ... the latter explanation here putting you less in a negative light. I have not alluded in the past to being board-certified with AASECT, but it guides my thinking, well, other than my deliberate reproductive snarky putdown, a simile I think simply best fits the humourously pathetic pass of posts leading up to this. I apologize to women for clustering Three Stooges along gender lines, you 3 Boys in the Bandwidth. You know who you are. Where on this forum have I supported a characterization of genital size that was directly related to race?, either than that such commentary was happenstance in relation to a general description that might have included admixture, though I am pretty sure I have not even hinted at a connection. In reality, I have experienced no correlation between race and endowment or intimacy style/acumen, other than that you, SS, a self-identified African Latino American (N of less than complete 1) report having a very small circle of friends and not making friends easily, while on several occasions attempting to cruelly and inaccurately attribute to me the defect of friendlessness. With the audacity of labelling me projectionist. Incorporating your snotty sidekick bottom feeding remora coasting on your ominous fins, I am more than willing to draw a correlation that reflects an unflattering stereotype. It seems to be something you want in order to scrape the bottom of the barrel in further castigating me. I have actually been DM tipped off. You have also recently ridiculed the notion of forum members meeting in person for face-to-face socializing. You come across as intelligent yet sociopathic, half under a rock and half squirming under a hefty shoulder chip. Furthermore, if anyone on this message board has posted scientific data attempting to disabuse readers of the misguided and inaccurate trope of horsehung Black/Brown males, who might that be??!! Oh, I can just see you frantically scurrying through the Search function ... hint: the term "penis". "Dick" would simply bring you to your own. Paborn, you are embarrassing yourself by egging on posts not grounded in reality. How the fuck do you know I am implicated in letting ride contributions that reinforce endowment stereotypes stratified ethnically. It is becoming a challenge to respect you and your judgement. Here's a redeemable penance suggestion: sift thru a few years of past posts and good luck seeing that you (and the 3rd Stooge candidate for that matter) are not represented in the multitude of subgroup negative characterizations your new BFF bosom buddy has made, including a variable vulnerably shared by our fearless and sweet Board leader. Hint: body somatotype. Otherwise, I repeat: Bonne chance with the Faustian bargain. I don't need you to like me or support me, particularly as I am not reluctant to point you out, but for your own sake and because you seem predominantly sweet and kind, keep it direct, try not to get triangulared in silly mean-girl alliances. I hope the next (eg 4th) sucker is not American ... that would trump a notion I am not hoping not to think.

Sheesh ... Does it have to be such a struggle for three of you to get your menstrual cycles synched up?

And that characterization repeated here ad nauseam infinitum yawn-um is purposeful ... how? LOL My spidey sense be detecting an apologist stereotype.

Repetitive spinning throbber stereotype ... ever consider taking some new material on a manipulative spin?

Ta. Like I need to fact check. He has also been compared unfavourably, not that moi would ever ... This is another example of the finger-pointer frantically attempting to distract by self-elevation. You were being Canuckly polite. LOL. Hand a tissue for the nose-bleed.

LOL, Finally ... Eddie, an appealing <soul jazz holman> crooner, antidote to <soleazzhole man> crone.

... she got you, hooker online and sinker.

Oh, noooo !!! Nellie Oleson prairie girl couz Sally Alice Hole 'bout gettin' to unfwiend summun an' hewrt there fee-fees weal bad.

Did I miss something? I thought that Badboy's hostile comment to Sydneyboy was about the perhaps relative safety of Thailand, not to do with age or type of worker. Crime rates seem independent of any dig about age or preferred type. If his advice is to "let go" the assault memory embedded at a younger age, it makes sense to stick with Rio and the many consecutive uneventful visits that subsequently occurred. I cannot be sure due to the trend for some associates to egg each other on in their disorganized contempt for difference. Gets confusing.

Yes, the predicted mockery Paborn out. Enjoy your Faustian bargain. LOL

Look, fellows ... there is a division here, fair enough, it happens. And who's zoomin'' who is actually ambiguous. LOL I don't particularly support one-sided alliance either way, and I would prefer to be friendly with everyone, however capable or incapable others are in making an accurate assessment of my motives. This thread got most derailed when I was criticized for posting some data I found interesting and relevant. I was certain that the language I used was qualitatively no different than my contributions earlier in the thread. As I reflect more on it, I think my earlier thread points were valued more because they attracted a shark school of the usual predictable array of bee-atches to send up a contributor whose posts were, granted, inconsistent and exaggerated. When that fizzled, it seems that I was the next best candidate in line for being chum in the water. Historically, it seems that anybody can be that chum for our most favourite chum here and whoever his current cronies may be ... they should all get a room, fuck themselves silly (however flaccidizing that thought) and bite each others' heads off for snacks. I have noticed similar trends in other interpersonal systems ... teams, families, working groups, etc. Best to just try to roll with it. It can be unfortunate and offputting at times. It is a challenge not to feel a teeny tiny bit superior as one witnesses substandard observational skills and half-baked pronouncements. But everybody has their own particular strengths that surpass mine. The negativity is disorienting because I had the good fortune of growing in a very healthy functioning family. On balance, I don't feel strongly I should ignore members. I accept that others may choose to react by not reacting. I think I am of average intelligence but I do like to stretch myself to learn, and I do try to track, unpack, and comprehend the often problematic dynamics that arise in the typical message board setting. I am smart enough to know that even these thoughts are up for grabs for gratuitous mockery. However, the key is simply to deposit such outliers' comments in the "questionable worth" bin, respond as needed, and calmly anticipate the next salvo. Extracting what is good about the forum as long as it is sufficiently proportional.

Not needed. I can handle on my own an arrogant ostentatious prick insisting on dogging me and select others. You always come back to this amateurish psychodiagnostic bone to gnaw on. It is like a tired invariant script. Don't you get tired of chasing your own tail? I don't mind taking the time to push back. It is like psychological Sudoku. You are both easy to know and flick away. On message boards, folks like you simply represent a faction of bright yet distasteful people that pervade our midst. Don't try to change. Your personality is entrenched, helpless yet essentialist in terms of the inevitable part-time troll role you fill. It is a dirty job, but someone has to fill it and your sacrifice is appreciated. I also prefer a troll with half a brain, so plod on, Snookums. Better you than some pitiful others the antithesis of a Mensa chapter prez. If readers want an education about you, or not, either way no skin off my ass.

Uh-oh, Adam. Not so simple, particularly kissing bugs that are as likely to fly as crawl, unlike bed bugs, and land on the human facial runway then progress near the gates of eyes, nose, and mouth for the bloody grub they then shit on. Pesticides banned there. A simple netted hood over head and fastened at shoulder level likely more effective. I always bring one to Brazil in case I see culprits in the bedroom because a second clade of dengue exposure from AE ''skeeter while sleeping could end up hemorrhagic. I think you MAY have just opened a minor shit-can of worms but the proverbial genie cannot be easily stuffed back into the pesticide bottle. LOL. I would not be inclined to use either of your two suggestions for bedbug bed locale control because there are easier more effective methods. We had Public Health specialists come in for an in-service a while back when some vulnerable patients were at risk during an urban uptick that was not, BTW, classist. I would also advise not to smash a bug caught in the act, or rub and scratch a bite site, smooshing the gut-sourced or faecal Chagas pathogen into the bloodstream where the wound is. Use an alcohol swab for light cleansing. Try to tolerate the itch or gently apply hydrocortisone cream to the site without vigorously rubbing it in. But here is the other type of rub ... if you precipitously require a transfusion in Latin America, the reliability of mandated Chagas-screening procedures for donated blood and the accuracy of diagnostic assays are not foolproof. The human prevalence is high. If you suspect a Chagas exposure while travelling, go to your closest InfectiousDiseases clinic for early pharmacological intervention upon returning home. Catching it early can eradicate its presence.

This would be a timely point at which to interject a thought. It is an inarguable point because it simply reflects a preference on my part, in case one ends up thinking it is worth trying to poke holes into. I comment also because it is a pattern rather than a one-time occurrence appropriate to just let slip. It works better for me when I am not informed that one approves of my post while referencing it in comparison to another's not approved of or liked, as if I am the good student while the other is dunce in the corner. It works better for me if one does not allude to my being spared a negative gif or image, as if you one is the authoritative adjudicator of the worth of contributions. My preference need not be heeded. I don't pretend to have strong influence, but I would be remiss if not pointing out something the average person wishes. I do value the prolific initiation of interesting, thoughtful topics. I hope that level of appreciation overrides the risk of offense taken.

Just how many casts of thousands on the message board here endorse your self-appointed bossy-pants moderator role? Like has been said previously, any reader can just bypass a post and consideration of an appreciative emoticon. Only a reminder ... I don't pretend to have the capacity to influence members very much, particularly the pseudoperson that your bad manners make you. In contrast, perhaps you crashed and burned at a Blue Man Group audition and desperately need a little drummer-boy soapbox for your face and overextended lid of garbage. Just breathe. I won't take editorial direction from any overly critical <soul's asshole>. If you truly understand the audience you would recognize that you are fired in terms of input for me, and would take your unsolicited resumé elsewhere for the oxygen your ego craves.

Bed bugs as a species are capable of carrying 40+ human pathogens but seem to not easily pass them back to humans. It has been thought HepB would be a likely candidate, but not yet borne out. For Chagas disease the larger kissing bug, its faeces, is the culprit accountable for millions of human infections. However, a second more recent animal-model medical entomology study in New Mexico does corroborate the theoretical potential, as per the Penn findings, for the Chagas pathogen to be transmitted by bedbug faeces. Note, though, the researchers deliberately infected the bedbugs by feeding them the pathogen. The pathogen was then detected in their waste. Bedbugs in the natural setting would need to be first infected by feeding on an infected (eg, human) host. They do not infect one another, so it could be quite isolated. They would also need to mimic the characteristic habit of kissing bugs, immediately shitting where they eat so that it mixes into the feeding site wound. Since kissing bugs are the true risk factor and the source of human-to-bedbug potential followed by theoretical reverse transmission, it seems that insect control should prioritize kissing bugs, so named because they gravitate to the face.

He has to have a Paypal account and invoice you. He needs your email. He does not need your name. You will get the invoice prompt and you can pay the invoice thru your PayPal. I am pretty sure you don't need any of his information to remit it. He can put in the attached note that he is F-Med etc. This is a new playbook for him. He may be reluctant to be seen as stepping up the illegal brokering via digital means. An invoice is more incriminating than exclusively a remittance . Weird he will not facilitate cash in hand.

Oh, sorry, here's the way ... go to xoom.com ... it is a division of Paypal for international transfer and will prompt you to log in to your paypal. Pick the country, bank, and enter his account number. It calculates the exchange so approximate it first in your currency. I only went as far as account field, but I think it does not afterwards request more info on him. PS: NO, wrong, I put in a mockup account number and it does request his specs!