RockyRoadTravel

Next I expect her to go on Joe Rogan. She isn't afraid to go into unfriendly territory. The defeated former president is showing his weakness being unable to do interviews from non-fawning journalists

Very interesting to see how Bret Baier turned an interview into a partisan debate. (Trump has been afraid of facing Harris in another debate.) She handled the speechifying, and questions, well. Harris should do more interviews with Bret Baier at FOX. She showed she doesn't need media safe spaces and support journalist as Trump has needed for months.

With Moses it's best to translate everything into Russian. It has an easier time understanding.

your BFF Vlad

and killing his opponents

and killing his opposition.

Yes. And governing. Something that was beyond the defeated former president's abilities.

Moses seems a generous sort, maybe he'll lend him a few rubles.

True

Lichtman's system is feeling a bit dated, or in need of a slight course correction anyway, with the MAGA echo chamber. There are naive people, like @EmmetK who believe the MAGA propaganda that the economy is toast, or believe the defeated former President isn't a weak man.

Paid? Haha. Good one

Rich priviledge.

Elon Musk. Haha. Good one. We missed you. Your posts are always good as a short cut for the "line" to be followed in the MAGA echo chamber. Good to see your MAGA half truths haven't made you too despondent. Here's the quote from Silver from the 17th: "But the headline is that the bold prediction I made after last week’s debate looks to be coming true: Kamala Harris is moving up in the polls enough that the model is converging back toward 50/50 in the Electoral College." He said his model was overly negative with Harris's odds because he factored in a convention bounce to deliberately pull down her numbers, but there wasn't much of a convention bounce. You might not get the full story in the echo chamber, you might only get random factoids that support the pre-determined MAGA party line. If you're ever confused again, you could reach out to guys here. A lot of the other posters seem to have access to fuller information than you seem to be able to access in the echo chamber.

Talking about Looney Loomer is indirectly talking about immigration. Trump has successfully changed the discussion. The press isn't talking about "concepts of a plan for health care" after nine years of campaigning, and that Trump lost the debate.

If people can stop being distracted by Laura Loomer for a moment, after nine years of saying repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, Trump still has no plan? He has concepts of a plan? After nine years? Is that even worse than his inability to get any infrastructure built? He was so weak as a President.

Sounds like Trump's pre-nup must be pretty good for her to be hocking this stuff.

If you are losing the game you start playing the referees. I've got no explanation for Trump's appeal other than there must be some really deeply ingrained racism, overt or subtle, amongst a wide swath of the American population. People who are more concerned about the WHITE working-class than they are about the white WORKING-CLASS as I said before. Race interest trumps economic interest. Trump's message is all you can do is fight over the crumbs left over for the working and middle-classes, and make sure the white folks get enough from the folks of color to survive. I need to succeed over my brown neighbor, because it's the best I can hope for; I'll never get more from the billionaire who owns my factory. Trump translates his bullying impulse to create and encourage a racism of white bullying of people of color as the only means of survival. Trump narrows economics to a battle over crumbs. To me it's a defeatist and minimal expectation of solving real economic issues. Trump is such a racist, to his bones.

Was there an eclipse yesterday?

True

Trump's requirement for another debate are getting more particular. FOX isn't good enough. Perhaps Trump would agree to Steve Bannon hosting the debate from the recreation room at his prison? Just to ensure "fairness".

@EmmetK is going to be mad with you. He likes to post about new polling information.

That is a word that has never applied to Trump. Josh Barrow yes. Trump no. (I won't tell Halperin about Josh.)

Those people will only vote for Harris in significant numbers if the election is a referendum on Trump and his chaos, criminality and disdain for the rule of law and the Constitution. Harris can rally her base with hope, the disaffected Republicans will rally, for one election only (I think Harris could make this point more often), based on Trump's existential threat to democracy and the American way of life.

Thank you for that truth yelling. DJT stock $16.16 today. Looks like Trump's abysmal perform in the debate has cost him about $250,000,000 in DJT stock value, As a meme stock It's plummeted on his performance.

I think it would be good for Harris (I almost called her Kamala) to start using more of her prosecutorial language. When she's referring to Project 2025 say Trump's finger prints are all over that document. Start talking about the co-conspirators from his White House who wrote Project 2025. Fingerprints and co-conspirators, it amplifies the felon and his whole criminal vibe.