Jump to content
TampaYankee

Franken Increases Lead Over Coleman

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Just reported by Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC that Franken has increased his lead to a total of 312 votes after the count of the additional 400 votes that the MN court validated. 1:25 PM

That is an increase from 225. The ball is now in Republican Gov. Pawlenty's court. Let's let the MN Supreme Court have it's say before the Gov.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that if the case is appealed to the SCOTUS ( odds against slightly IMO) they will have the good sense not to take it.

I'm guessing the MN supreme court will be the final stop. They'll either take it or they won't. I can't guess whether they will, but I'm betting that the finding of the lower court that there is no evidence of corruption in the process will stand, and that Franken will take the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest eastburbguy

< I'm guessing the MN supreme court will be the final stop.

Don't hold your breath....

(Political comments expunged in line with site policy, TY)

I'm guessing the MN supreme court will be the final stop. They'll either take it or they won't. I can't guess whether they will, but I'm betting that the finding of the lower court that there is no evidence of corruption in the process will stand, and that Franken will take the election.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
< I'm guessing the MN supreme court will be the final stop.

Don't hold your breath.

I appreciate that the MN electorate must feel frustrated by this time.

Whatever the motiviations involved, the process will come to an end and those in a position to influence most the final resolution path/timetable will have to stand in front of the MN electorate for ultimate judgment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
< Will this ever be over?

Not until the Fat Lady, i.e., SCOTUS, has sung. :(

When SCOTUS took control of the Florida recount, it gave the public a distorted notion of the electoral role of the federal judiciary. That was a one off intervention into an extraodinary situation. SCOTUS has strong institutional reasons to keep out of contested elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...