Inflated rates?!

[Riobard]

This thread could go on, ad infinitum, as if asymmetry of power between any two peers or possible factions in a queer (or any) chatroom is attainable and declarable. 

And nobody will have clued me in on a better way to keep arousal intact while still walking away with a clean conscience, if not respectably higher on some abstract moral superiority scale. The topic is self-limiting every time but will emerge repeatedly because I suppose it’s necessary … for some more than others.

[vinapu]

13 hours ago, mauRICE said:

 This may surprise you but the vast majority of Thais do not live and breathe Patpong and Foodland.

Will not surprise me at all as it supports point I made earlier in the thread that locals  have their own sources of paid sex , haircuts  and other noble services inaccessible to occasional visitors and thus their pricing may be different.

[vinapu]

12 hours ago, PeterRS said:

 

You would do well to read @vinapu's post made four hours ago.

everybody is entitled to my point of view ! 

[vinapu]

4 hours ago, jason1975 said:

I am first category because I feel the guys I meet deserve it! 🥳

# me too even if some guys   not necessarily deserve it,  but very SE Asian air creates charitable disposition in my heart and loosens my pocket

[vinapu]

3 hours ago, khaolakguy said:

Never seen so many downvotes on one thread!

.....................

Are we all going to hell? 

some people like red color

...................

hell , no, not me ! I just came from church , it's Palm Sunday after all

[vinapu]

1 hour ago, Riobard said:

The Pavlovian summoning ritual is exquisite, like convent bells for Lauds. Then the resident busybody fibbertigibbet shuffling into the confessional, breaking silence to reveal that any sighting of extended coherent, prose triggers immediate recognition of a single parishioner.

I would stick to my grandma's receipt and add some bleach

[Riobard]

20 minutes ago, vinapu said:

everybody is entitled to my point of view ! 

At least AMBOSS by Vinapu [sic] has meaningful content. 

[vinapu]

1 hour ago, ChristianPFC said:

 

The same standards I apply to myself, I apply to others. I would take the songtheo and walk to meet the boy at his room, therefore I expect him to do the same and I wouldn't pay for a taxi for him to come to my room.  

...................................

I distinguish two kinds of posters:

those who brag how much they pay prostitutes,

and those who brag how little they pay prostitutes. 

very good point and I sense whiff of Kant's  philosophy

.......................

wrong methodology as you put aside majority who doesn't mention financials at all

[vinapu]

46 minutes ago, Riobard said:

This thread could go on, ad infinitum, as if asymmetry of power between any two peers or possible factions in a queer (or any) chatroom is attainable and declarable. 

And nobody will have clued me in on a better way to keep arousal intact while still walking away with a clean conscience, if not respectably higher on some abstract moral superiority scale. The topic is self-limiting every time but will emerge repeatedly because I suppose it’s necessary … for some more than others.

I agree with some sprinkling of powdered chocolate.

Hope by 'some" you mean all , including distinguished yourself,  who took part in this heated, red coloured  discussion

[vinapu]

12 minutes ago, Riobard said:

At least AMBOSS by Vinapu [sic] has meaningful content. 

 

no idea what AMBOSS stands for but I like your post regardless

[thaiophilus]

8 hours ago, Keithambrose said:

Do you know @Riobard

In a Baudrillardian sense?

[Riobard]

1 hour ago, vinapu said:

I would stick to my grandma's receipt and add some bleach

A very Catholic recipe. One would expect something resembling remorse prior to granting absolution for our nun’s repetitive venial sins. 

[Riobard]

34 minutes ago, vinapu said:

 

[Riobard]

52 minutes ago, vinapu said:

Hope by 'some" you mean all , including distinguished yourself,  who took part in this heated, red coloured  discussion

But not the membership majority that wisely has other activities … pick a methodology when stratifying some, others, alls, nones, do’s, dont’s. I was summoned to court by an unsophisticated jester. You are holding court several rungs up the red cherry-picker. No shortage of flung chocolate sprinklings. 

[Riobard]

1 hour ago, vinapu said:

very good point and I sense whiff of Kant's  philosophy

.......................

wrong methodology as you put aside majority who doesn't mention financials at all

Kant would, I think, be underwhelmed by both the high and low pricing dialects, particularly if trade is an entity upon which status or thrift is performed. He might also distinguish between identifying two visible poles of budgetary display for reasonable emphasis versus somehow failing to conduct a complete punter census.

Full disclosure: no whiff of perfume prestige here; I haven’t read him.