Inflated rates?!

[Riobard]

This thread could go on, ad infinitum, as if asymmetry of power between any two peers or possible factions in a queer (or any) chatroom is attainable and declarable. 

And nobody will have clued me in on a better way to keep arousal intact while still walking away with a clean conscience, if not respectably higher on some abstract moral superiority scale. The topic is self-limiting every time but will emerge repeatedly because I suppose it’s necessary … for some more than others.

[vinapu]

13 hours ago, mauRICE said:

 This may surprise you but the vast majority of Thais do not live and breathe Patpong and Foodland.

Will not surprise me at all as it supports point I made earlier in the thread that locals  have their own sources of paid sex , haircuts  and other noble services inaccessible to occasional visitors and thus their pricing may be different.

[vinapu]

12 hours ago, PeterRS said:

 

You would do well to read @vinapu's post made four hours ago.

everybody is entitled to my point of view ! 

[vinapu]

4 hours ago, jason1975 said:

I am first category because I feel the guys I meet deserve it! 🥳

# me too even if some guys   not necessarily deserve it,  but very SE Asian air creates charitable disposition in my heart and loosens my pocket

[vinapu]

3 hours ago, khaolakguy said:

Never seen so many downvotes on one thread!

.....................

Are we all going to hell? 

some people like red color

...................

hell , no, not me ! I just came from church , it's Palm Sunday after all

[vinapu]

1 hour ago, Riobard said:

The Pavlovian summoning ritual is exquisite, like convent bells for Lauds. Then the resident busybody fibbertigibbet shuffling into the confessional, breaking silence to reveal that any sighting of extended coherent, prose triggers immediate recognition of a single parishioner.

I would stick to my grandma's receipt and add some bleach

[Riobard]

20 minutes ago, vinapu said:

everybody is entitled to my point of view ! 

At least AMBOSS by Vinapu [sic] has meaningful content. 

[vinapu]

1 hour ago, ChristianPFC said:

 

The same standards I apply to myself, I apply to others. I would take the songtheo and walk to meet the boy at his room, therefore I expect him to do the same and I wouldn't pay for a taxi for him to come to my room.  

...................................

I distinguish two kinds of posters:

those who brag how much they pay prostitutes,

and those who brag how little they pay prostitutes. 

very good point and I sense whiff of Kant's  philosophy

.......................

wrong methodology as you put aside majority who doesn't mention financials at all

[vinapu]

46 minutes ago, Riobard said:

This thread could go on, ad infinitum, as if asymmetry of power between any two peers or possible factions in a queer (or any) chatroom is attainable and declarable. 

And nobody will have clued me in on a better way to keep arousal intact while still walking away with a clean conscience, if not respectably higher on some abstract moral superiority scale. The topic is self-limiting every time but will emerge repeatedly because I suppose it’s necessary … for some more than others.

I agree with some sprinkling of powdered chocolate.

Hope by 'some" you mean all , including distinguished yourself,  who took part in this heated, red coloured  discussion

[vinapu]

12 minutes ago, Riobard said:

At least AMBOSS by Vinapu [sic] has meaningful content. 

 

no idea what AMBOSS stands for but I like your post regardless

[thaiophilus]

8 hours ago, Keithambrose said:

Do you know @Riobard

In a Baudrillardian sense?

[Riobard]

1 hour ago, vinapu said:

I would stick to my grandma's receipt and add some bleach

A very Catholic recipe. One would expect something resembling remorse prior to granting absolution for our nun’s repetitive venial sins. 

[Riobard]

34 minutes ago, vinapu said:

 

[Riobard]

52 minutes ago, vinapu said:

Hope by 'some" you mean all , including distinguished yourself,  who took part in this heated, red coloured  discussion

But not the membership majority that wisely has other activities … pick a methodology when stratifying some, others, alls, nones, do’s, dont’s. I was summoned to court by an unsophisticated jester. You are holding court several rungs up the red cherry-picker. No shortage of flung chocolate sprinklings. 

[Riobard]

2 hours ago, vinapu said:

very good point and I sense whiff of Kant's  philosophy

.......................

wrong methodology as you put aside majority who doesn't mention financials at all

Kant would, I think, be underwhelmed by both the high and low pricing dialects, particularly if trade is an entity upon which status or thrift is performed. He might also distinguish between identifying two visible poles of budgetary display for reasonable emphasis versus somehow failing to conduct a complete punter census.

Full disclosure: no whiff of prestige perfume here; I haven’t read him.

[Riobard]

2 hours ago, vinapu said:

some people like red color

...................

Triggered, are they? 

I’ll leave the trigonometric geometry to the rest of you. So many colourful angles, so little time.

[Keithambrose]

2 hours ago, thaiophilus said:

In a Baudrillardian sense?

It seems that you have set him off again!

[Keithambrose]

2 hours ago, Riobard said:

But not the membership majority that wisely has other activities … pick a methodology when stratifying some, others, alls, nones, do’s, dont’s. I was summoned to court by an unsophisticated jester. You are holding court several rungs up the red cherry-picker. No shortage of flung chocolate sprinklings. 

It seems that you are a follower of the 'cut up' technique, popularised, among others, by Willam Burroughs 

[PeterRS]

On 3/28/2026 at 9:05 AM, PeterRS said:

And can you kindly inform us which other member/s have made that comment - particularly the use of the words "dominance boost"? I do not recall seeing that before.

You still have not clarified the untruth you stated. You have merely copped out. 

On 3/28/2026 at 10:24 AM, Enchanted_Elixir said:

You have a history of altercations with various forum members and have driven at least one thoughtful and interesting  poster away from this forum. . . . .. You won’t drive me away.

"A long history" What utter rubbish! Well I did send you several PMs and you wrote one one-line reply that failed to answer the points I raised. Yet again you lied! The member you quoted has not been "driven away from this forum". He has been reading this Board almost daily as can be seen from the list of on-line members at the foot of each page. You failed to read the background and you came to an assumption - an incorrect assumption which is obvious if you had actually bothered to read posts in some detail (which you did not). Further, you quote "various altercations"! This, since you seem not to realise, is a chat room and members have different views. Differences of opinion are often the norm. Or did you not realise that?

On 3/28/2026 at 10:18 AM, Enchanted_Elixir said:

A cheap shot.

While I do not always agree with mauRICE, he has a depth to his opinions borne out of real experience on the ground that you often lack.

As you have noted above, you have been a member of this Board for about six months and made less than 170 posts. When did you start reading it and paying attention to the posts? I have been a member for more than 15 years and made 7,048 posts. In my earlier incarnation on this Board i probably made at least another 1,000. When did you start reading and paying attention to the posts on this forum?

"Real experience on the ground"? That is also laughable. I first visited Thailand regularly after being posted to Hong Kong in 1979. I had visitd at least 50 times before moving to Bangkok to live in 2002. "Real experience" Ha!

True, I have criticised other posters from time to time as they have criticised me. If you can't stand up to criticism, there is no point joining any chat room because it will always be there in one form or another. This is not a spinsters' tea party! On the other hand, I have written a huge volume of posts that have been particularly well received. 

I did make one total error by repeating you tube clickbait that has nothing to do with the issue at hand in this series of posts. But in your postings you have chosen to make erroneous statements without any form of apology because they were and continue to be wrong. I have no issue with criticism, but when it is wrong some form of acknowledgement of that fact is a courtesy to other members - unless you wish to be known as someone who merely lies.

[floridarob]

Aunty Vin, since you're horn is broken.... seems long overdue to beep, beep , beep.....however, it seems like post is dead, not just off-track 🤷‍♂️ 

 (Riobard, no comments, I'm behaving)

[Enchanted_Elixir]

14 hours ago, Keithambrose said:

It seems that you have set him off again!

You invited him in 🤷‍♂️

[Enchanted_Elixir]

7 hours ago, PeterRS said:

You failed to read the background and you came to an assumption - an incorrect assumption which is obvious if you had actually bothered to read posts in some detail (which you did not). Further, you quote "various altercations"! This, since you seem not to realise, is a chat room and members have different views. Differences of opinion are often the norm. Or did you not realise that?

Have you been this pompous in all your 15 years on the forum?

[vinapu]

5 hours ago, floridarob said:

...however, it seems like post is dead, 

look at bright side,  we are alive

[vinapu]

9 hours ago, PeterRS said:

 

As you have noted above, you have been a member of this Board for about six months and made less than 170 posts. When did you start reading it and paying attention to the posts? I have been a member for more than 15 years and made 7,048 posts. In my earlier incarnation on this Board i probably made at least another 1,000.

number of posts, while welcomed contribution to the forum , should not be treated as way of grading members.

Look at me , 23000 posts and not even one making single member horny.