Riobard

You both rest my case and on this distracting tangent may even squeak a bit out of the corner you painted yourself into desperately defending a position that was successfully challenged.

A convenient hop-off at linked Metro station of same name.

IMG_8725.mov IMG_8725.mov IMG_8740.mov

Let me help you out. It reads, Reader, that what you have is on the rise.

Now you are layering on more ridiculousness, silly. You (not inappropriately) started a thread on a complex topic, with media representation of academic epidemiological concepts that would naturally lead to ongoing additional epidemiological and standard public health languaging among posters, terms utilized conventionally within the very literature on which theses are reported. You know exactly what each word means, feel challenged and offended, transparently and flimsily coming back with a frivolous and vexatious dig aimed at corroborating your alliances.

You are really reaching here and being deliberately asinine, but I’m sure the tangential and irrelevant focus on presentation appeal could persist ad infinitum when contrarianism is the driver. Personal hygiene and susceptibility to STD infection is not correlated or causally significant. Period. Partner episode volume being equal, judicious personal hygiene is salutary for obvious reasons, but NOT STI-preventive, period. The prevention heuristic regarding behavioural risk mitigation, when watered down with erroneous assumptions about personal hygiene has been deleterious in LMIC contexts because if a condom, for example, is lacking but soap is accessible the security conferred by a lesser but erroneously valued prevention measure is equally fallacious, breeching principles of beneficence. Sexual hygiene optimization is facilitated by de-mythologizing.

Sigh. It’s both a given and tautological. Hygienic cachet upticks exposure risk. @unicorn , perhaps others, can appreciate the logic fallacies peppering this thread.

Chapeau! It’s difficult to be unaware when obnoxious chatroom Sinonegativist ‘othering’ is shoved up one’s sinus.

Myself being a nipple man …

What surprised me a little was the vast touring mobs enduring 95degreeF beating down sun hours at a time. I expected busy but not nudged and jostled in open spaces at 09:00

As a server, I’d have at first immediately donned a surgical mask, offered you a Kleenex, and exclaimed whatever the local ‘god bless’ equivalent would be, perhaps also diligently inquiring about allergies and quickly reviewing the venue’s liability package. It’s not uncommon these days to have a bug up your ass, nasal-pharyngeal zone, etc.

Somewhat surprisingly, garotocomlocal has been gradually expanding its international base, with no less than 60 or so ads within the bookends of the Toronto-Montreal corridor, very little crossover with the typically more go-to sites, albeit the rather uninspiring yet perhaps pruriently metaphorical heading Boy With Room, owing to literal translation. I believe that the small print of this company suggests any negative content escort reviews are prohibited, bringing to mind an association between permissible content and the usual consumercaveat emptor. I have used the site in Brazil rarely yet successfully, mostly the provider hosting. True identities and personal contexts mutually known.

It was the shortest route a few dozen times and I apologetically explained to the many enthusiastic impressively work-ethical solicitors of several houses presumably geared to optional rub-n-tug slide-n-glide services, surrounded by a seemingly endless array of underutilized staff, attempting to usher me in that I was busy dealing with the strange phenomenon of occasionally coming upon scenes like this in the jewel-box rain-shower steps away. That said, I expect that many visitors to this site would be interested if not thrilled to purchase a pre- or post- Mango Tree amuse bouche or mignardise at aforementioned cluster of outlets. My apologies in advance if the images put anybody off erotic encounters. IMG_9142.mov IMG_9183.mov

Not how that term is employed. Rather, for example, ‘you behave in the very manner that you criticize in others.’ Behaviour is not projectable as it is external, not an introject.

Gross oversimplifications not supported by qualitative research on MSM’s awareness and attitudes regarding viral and bacterial STIs.

KFC antidote [4 minutes] (Don’t get me wrong; ❤️ me some Colonel; don’t have in Québec) RPReplay_Final1704078083.mov

“A big temple” in Bangkok. Shoes also off. Who knew?

Unless it’s Briddish or Disstrikt.

Yes, it’s clear you yank the arms off little kids’ teddy bears as well as helpless insects and the occasional amphibian here and there.

Just a few hours, but I register surprise. 2 venues opposite sides of world with common theme and I assumed of some familiarity among those not bullshitting about travels and not generally bullshitfaced when attending. By the way, dumbelinas’ downvotes rack up reputation badge merit points just like any other category. Mwahahah. I’m too cheap a bitch; otherwise my fingerprints would be worn down.

The important thing is my being prepared and refraining from assuming somebody is short a few deck cards when they may be just jerking my chain.

Yes. Plus one. Did you think I was on a soapbox? Plus Molina’s research similarly tripped into the same observation more by accident than design, and as I indicated it’s Eff around 50% was (and is) apparently questioned by external peers. The product innocuousness level factor concomitant with preliminary and refutable effectiveness findings does not substitute for the rigour of currently running focused trials. One study (Oregon unis?) observed a lower GC incidence rate comparing Outer Membrane Vesicle MBV (the format driver of contemporary research) to non-OMV MBV, thousands in each category subgroup of MBV recipients. Observational but not a VaxxPoz vs VaxxNeg binary scenario that, as you astutely point out, introduces behavioural confounder effects. Unfortunately, it’s taking several years to execute the research yet one must not succumb to impatience by recklessly accepting prematurity.