Marc in Calif

And you are still a proven liar! I proved it above in the case of the Emerson College poll report that you totally screwed up. 🤣 😂🤣 The case isn't closed until you respond to my last two posts -- which you've ignored because your sad clown face is just too red and embarrased at making such a dumb error! 🤡

For the record, the chart above is NOT from the Emerson College report to which you linked. They're for the MULTI-CANDIDATE polling that Emerson carried out and reported in some other report. Here's the only presidential poll chart that the Emerson College report displays. The following numbers are NOT the same as yours because they're from the Emerson TWO-WAY ONLY poll (Biden vs. Trump). You should have known this, bub! 🤣🤡🤣

Sorry, but you're still absolutely wrong. The numbers you quoted, listed, and displayed in color were precisely the following, which I've PASTED directly from your original post. You claim that they were from the Emerson College report that you linked. Arizona: Trump +4 Georgia: Trump +8 Michigan: Trump +2 Nevada: Trump +3 Pennsylvania: Trump +3 Wisconsin: Trump +2 I'm very sorry to have to tell you this... perhaps you don't even realize it. But these numbers were for only the MULTI-CANDIDATE POLLING. And there were no multicandidate polls included in your Emerson College web link. Emerson reported only on its TWO-WAY (Biden vs. Trump) POLLING at that link. Kinda sloppy, right? 🤡 So if you really want to debate the numbers that you quoted in your original post, please be sure to tell people where those numbers actually came from. They weren't from your linked Emerson College report page Just to repeat... The following multi-candidate chart that you posted 19 hours ago was NOT in the Emerson College Poll report that you linked to. It's from another web page, which nobody can find without a link. Not too careful, are you? Aren't you embarrassed? 🤣🤣🤣

I quoted the EXACT, PRECISE, and IDENTICAL numbers shown in the linked Emerson press release that YOU showed us: https://emersoncollegepolling.com/june-2024-state-polls-trump-maintains-edge-over-biden/ New Emerson College Polling/The Hill state polls find former President Donald Trump with a slight edge on President Joe Biden in Arizona (47% to 43%), Georgia (45% to 41% [= +4%]), Wisconsin (47% to 44%) Nevada (46% to 43%), Pennsylvania (47% to 45% [= +2%]), and Michigan (46% to 45% [= +1%]), while Biden splits with Trump in Minnesota (45% to 45%). For the record, YOU were the one who originally said that those same numbers were these: Georgia: Trump +8 Pennsylvania: Trump +3 Michigan: Trump +2 So what can be simpler than that? Why are you now changing the numbers? Backpedaling and changing the numbers in YOUR linked article is not a good look for you. Embarrassed much? 🤣🤣🤣

May I ask how you chose your immigration officer -- assuming that all three were men? 😊

You lie, sir! 🤣 According to the Emerson numbers to which you link, the correct numbers for the following states are actually these: Georgia: Trump +4 (45% to 41%) Michigan: Trump +1 (46% to 45%) Pennsylvania: Trump + 2 (47% to 45%) You cannot read your own poll numbers accurately! 😝 I'm not very surprised that Repuglican optometrists seem to be giving out prescriptions with "fake" numbers. 🙈 👓 👓 🙈 👓 👓 🙈

In the discussion of "regulars" vs. "visitors," I think they're talking about regular providers vs. visiting providers -- and how we as customers can tell the difference.

ONEPLUS makes very good phones -- little used here in the USA. It's been only five months since I stopped using my 5T. It worked fine for six years until it simply didn't.

Were your two free naked massages provided by Thai masseurs? Was the concierge Thai -- and also was he naked?

Still making broad generalizations based on limited sample sizes, eh! 🤣 For example, these two countries have virtually the same rate of circumsion at 92% (for very different reasons).

I asked if @Shax was British because it's primarily the British who still widely use the word Oriental to describe East Asians and Southeast Asians. And you did the same! 🙂

You're British, right? 😊

Moses Land will definitely accept Drumpf. Or would it? 😉

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—Writing an impassioned letter on Monday to Judge Juan Merchan, Melania Trump argued that sentencing her husband to house arrest would mean cruel and unusual punishment for her. Mrs. Trump wrote that confining her husband to any place where she resides would be a clear violation “not only of the US Constitution, but of the Geneva Conventions.” “Your Honor, you can prevent a humanitarian crisis,” she continued. “The human I speak of is me.” Suggesting an appropriate sentence for her felonious husband, Mrs. Trump wrote, “Prison be best.”

I think that @reader might be referring to the new Mae Bae bar opening next week. He heard it from a guy in the street. 😀