Moses

US: 8 U.S.C. § 1304(e) 8 C.F.R. § 264.1

I have nobody in my ignoring list

The first stage is always denial.

Could you please switch on your brain for 1 minute? Of course they crossed the Belarus-Poland border! There are three possibilities: - they were pro-Russian saboteurs - they were Ukrainian saboteurs - they were saboteurs motivated by their own ideological reasons, for example, followers of those who carried out the genocide of Poles in Volyn Poland can be entered from the east from: - Russia - Belarus - Ukraine - Lithuania If the saboteurs are pro-Russian, they will not travel from Russia, so as not to demonstrate their affiliation; they cannot travel from Lithuania and Ukraine, because their regimes are hostile. That leaves Belarus. If the saboteurs are pro-Ukrainian, they will not travel from Ukraine or Lithuania, so as not to demonstrate their affiliation; they cannot travel from Russia, because their regimes are hostile. That leaves Belarus. If the saboteurs are ideological and not affiliated with any state, they cannot travel from Ukraine—crossing the border to the West is prohibited for men between 18 and 60 years old. For the same reason, they cannot enter through Lithuania, and they cannot travel through Russia because they lack Russian support. However, the Ukrainian-Belarusian border is densely forested and not as heavily guarded as the western border. That leaves Belarus. Bottom line: the optimal route to Poland for saboteurs of any affiliation is through Belarus.

You're the liar here. It was your limited brain that assumed my motives, and now you're trying to attribute them to me. You didn't even bother to understand the facts. Two saboteurs - 2 citizens of Ukraine - officially crossed the Polish border, were seen on CCTV cameras, committed an act of sabotage, and then officially crossed the border again, leaving Poland. These are facts. That's why Tusk reported the saboteurs' citizenship—they were identified on video, and their identity and citizenship were determined by biometric data left at the border. Everything else is your conjecture, just like Tusk's—it's impossible to determine who the saboteurs are working for from biometric data; they weren't detained, so they can't testify. And assuming that the Poles know who they're working for from other sources is stupid, because then the question arises: why were they allowed into Poland if they knew about their ties to Russia? The logical conclusion is that Tusk's statement about saboteurs' connections to Russia is political speculation, akin to the classic British slander "highly likely" assumption. Therefore, everything you wrote about me above is your dirty speculative conjecture, dirty lies, and slander. You're arrogant, confident in your own infallible rightness, a baseless, brainwashed, and limited-knowledge individual.

You still not got? I'm just playing and teasing. Here isn't right place to discuss real politic: nobody here has own source of information - everyone (almost, I know only Vinapu can read Russian and that means he maybe also may read Ukrainian) here takes the same information from filtered Western sources. What to discuss? Almost everyone here is believer into Western medias, templates and holy democracy. I can read information from all sides of conflict, compare and make own conclusions. And many things what you takes as a truth are just Western urban legends, implemented by Western propaganda. "Oceania has never been at war with Ostasia" - you know what I mean.

You again lie? Please quote me where I'm "falsely implying Ukraine". Whole "false implication" was in your mind. I wrote here only fact "2 citizens of Ukraine". Do you want to oppose that fact?

See above about McCarthyism. Nothing new for human civilization. I'm going to bed - 2AM here

The same March'22

Personally, I think he was deeply disliked in the Council. And the personal relationships between the deputies resulted in this outcome. Remember what happened in the US during McCarthyism? Or what they did to Japanese American citizens during the war—all those concentration camps in the US? That's roughly what happened in 2022—the government didn't yet understand how the majority of the population would react to the events and applied maximum force where it wasn't really needed.

No. It wasn't public meeting. It was Council meeting. By the way: trial was initiated by report of other members of Council.

Wrong. He was municipal deputy, not a "Moscow city deputy" - and that is huge difference. 7 years is correct. He was first person who was prosecuted. He said in March'22 exactly "For information, I will say that about 100 children died in Ukraine." In April 2022 at the trial, he was unable to provide evidence to support his claims and was accused of disinformation.

In Russian we have popular proverb "One fool can ask so many questions that 7 wise men won't be able to answer them all in time". I'm sure you aren't fool, but proverb demonstrating situation: you publish a lot of question, each is short, but I have to explain context about each one. And English isn't my best skill. So I take just one easy proofing fact from each post and show you result.

Police protected her from public. Read article with help of Google translation.

Well then let's talk about facts. Osipova wasn't fined She made exhibition of her antiwar arts in SPB. There were 77 her works. I will quote news: "One day, Osipova took to the streets with anti-war posters, which read, among other things, "The war in Ukraine and Syria is Russia's shame." The artist was surrounded by a crowd of angry people who began snatching the posters from her, threatening her, and calling her a traitor. Osipova was only saved that time by the appearance of riot police, who intervened between the crowd and the artist." More here in Russian (speaking about opposition medias) https://www.severreal.org/a/v-peterburge-politseyskie-snyali-kartiny-s-antivoennoy-vystavki/32249563.html As you can see - this information is freely distributing here. It is opposition media at Russian Nord-West, sponsored by Radio Freedom (US). And state don't need to suppress such individuals - public will do it instead.