Riobard

I might add that it would be entirely unreasonable to not converse about a cute tiny emoji tatt on a voluptuous bare rump.

“HAVE FUN” tatt “TAKE FIVE” panties Is that a low estimate or is it a case of being stingy? And doesn’t he have access to the PUMP! nickers line where you are?

Considering the location, though, coulda snapped worse.

I’ve always wondered.

To clarify, as I was previously uncertain and the media omitted the details, the court record indicates enticement for both elements, prostitution and sexual activity. If there is a charge related to prohibited oral sex with a minor that actually occurred between Smith and the minor, it is not listed in the Information containing the federal 2422(b) charge. However, my understanding, albeit limited, is that it would be a state Class E felony in the third degree. It is unclear whether Smith, the second adult, or both assaulted the child and if New York charges are forthcoming.

I won’t be descending to insulting your mother. Mine is off limits. Get help with your lack of boundaries.

My mother accompanied me to the dentist in our small town to consult and pay the fee. Afterwards at the shopping centre I needed to use the facilities while she waited. I emerged frustrated as the cubicles were persistently occupied. She muttered “Gall darn fairies”. With the tooth extraction and all was I ever confused. Other than that she was a kind person seemingly non-prejudicial with respect to orientation.

I essentially do the same when warranted, but applying the Ignore-the-Bore account feature.

If you must, start small.

At one point did the younger Green take advantage of a Carpet World discount on his way to the Peach Pit?

Yet he’s not short-changed, innit?

You evidently yourself have a few obsessed fans crossed over from Onlytrolls.pu/boring. As they are holed up in rainbow rings and drafting off of you with insatiable attention-seeking yet with nothing interesting to contribute to your topics have you considered monetizing your content?

@PeterRS, you don't need to look very far, particularly in the tech age, to determine that pedophilia themed exploitation is very much alive and flourishing. I know guys that won’t go near chat rooms without strict rules and boundaries related to content that implies openness to sexualizing based on the appearance of youth. It creeps out a lot of intelligent sexually mature men because often the only thing standing in the way of glorifying man-boy sex is the law. Interesting but not surprising entry about jury trials.

Right, understood. But there are an additional few weeks of mortality data and that was the basis of my point about temporal periods. You are bang on the money in assessing and illustrating that the program read “current” from the question posed and then confounded cumulative and recent. The problem is that both cumulative data and recent data are current while the former combines the historical with the latest, net historical because a minute ago is history. The output can only be as good as the framing of the inquiry.

And absolute weekly number of Thailand deaths has since halved, so I wouldn’t compare the mortality rate between two nations according to population denominators based on as short a period as one week. Besides, the only reason mortality was raised, essentially a nothing-burger tangent that was meant to dismiss the implications of infection during a holiday, was to throw a curve into the inquiry. It wasn’t a question about the worst possible outcome or the quality of epidemiological surveillance.

China and Hong Kong incidence trending down from a recent peak. In that same period Singapore was trending upwards but the pattern in the broader region has been a shortlived surge. A risk tolerance of 25% infection event probability sets the estimate person contact number as 8, pared down from the 25 I previously outlined as associated with 60% risk. I can update briefly from the next bulletin first week of July.

Certainly valuable as an adjunct to the agenda of prevalence estimation and stratification of predominant variants. And fecally fascinating. Moreover, the same samples can be utilized for flu and RSV shedding and Canada does that surveillance with consistently up to date ratings. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436524000549?ref=pdf_download&fr=RR-2&rr=956968a7b901a2b6

If a Medicine student I’m research mentoring produced this quality of reporting they would be going back to the drawing board after disposing of the stinking trash heap produced by the ill-advised AI attempt.

I follow bi-weekly WHO epi bulletins and I translate to exposure risk based on established algorithms that adjust for case contagion period and incidence ascertainment bias. Incidence in Thailand surged early May but has since settled to about half that recent curve peak. For Thailand mid-June, not adjusted for regional variation, your interaction with 25 individuals on any given day means an exposure risk of 60%. Obviously that does not guarantee viral transmission. If you want to lower that risk metric to a set value you need to tell me what your risk tolerance is in percentage terms and I can compute what rule of thumb to employ regarding number of contacts. These would be contacts in which common sense in terms of physical proximity would guide you behaviourally. Mortality is trending at about 1 in 2,000 cases, .05%, or less if the true incidence denominator is underestimated.

I’ve witnessed it with patients that objected following review board greenlighting of tube feeding but did not want the imposition of restraints and were invasively nourished with acute care setting visual supervision. It’s unimaginably horrible, usually a losing battle no more than palliative. I suspect restraints will be applied in this case because the patience of less intrusive monitoring will wear thin and his status unfortunately evokes little public sympathy.

Let me guess … you must have discount-prompted robust tumescence just even writing this. Not that I lack appreciation, as what some folks are keen about as representative of a small minority can helpfully steer others, the majority, in different directions. Although the apparent obscured visibility Monday factor for others could help matters on the pythetic front. Me, I prefer them looking good and feeling good. By all means see for yourself the novelty and checking it out is cheap but, guys, you’re not going to want to spend your hard-earned cash on interactive play on Brig Luís Antônio upon the extensive effort of travelling all that distance.

117 is newly describing Wednesdays as inclusive of a ‘darkroom’, I assume the easily identifiable existing central area. Also free suites as other attempts to beef up Wednesday attendance with discounts have not been effective. I would take this as license on any operating day for some degree of erotic play without censure. However, my visits are extensive enough for the long game of setting up contacts with Tuesday trade.

I expect that was due to the Pride crowd. I’ve enjoyed a bite there on several occasions but have not noticed much eye candy of note. Perhaps more in the wee hours when I’m asleep.

The escorts are not physically attractive; on that basis alone the place is Pythetic. Don’t go by another’s taste. I realize that includes me but I do have venue comparison referencing behind my perspective. Otherwise, it can be enjoyable as an outing and you may intercept one of the buff show performers for more private entertainment if you haven’t figured out other plentiful options in the city. There is a large residential complex adjacent to it and growing protest regarding the typical music noise encroaching on inhabitants’ tranquillity. When it comes to some of these venue operators stupid is as stupid does.