2 hours ago, Moses said:

Stateprom (Derzhprom) never been civilian - it is industrial building https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derzhprom with offices of state agencies.

...

 

There you go again with more lies. The website you provided, as you know (since you provided the link), says nothing about what the building was used for, and discusses ONLY its architecture and the Russian bombing. You have given no reference to counter my reference which stated it was a residential building. Even if it were true (which it isn't) that this is a government building, that would still not make it a military target (unless it had a military function, such as the Pentagon in the US, but even you didn't allege that to be the case). As for your photos, the fact that a bus has an agriculture company's name on it doesn't mean it wasn't transporting Russian troops at the time, obviously. You provide links without quotes, hoping no one will check up on your lies, but--sorry for you--I did. 

51 minutes ago, Moses said:

10000 deaths on 1500 km of front line in 1000 days means 0.0067 deaths per 1 km of war front per day. It is 1000 times less than number of deaths on Ukrainian roads per day (6.7).

December 14 2024. Ukrainian dron drops explosive on school bus in Shevchenkovo.

Apart from measuring death number in km per frontline I find very weird, your answer has nothing to do with my question:

You say Ukranian government could have easily been removed long ago. Easily = 0 deaths on Russian side and within few days, I suppose?
Instead your special operation war lost already 10.000s (note the "s" plural) on Russian side.
So why do it in the apparently not so easy way?

4 minutes ago, 10tazione said:

So why do it in the apparently not so easy way?

Because typical "easy way" looks like this (typical American easy way). Mosul, Iraq.

16 hours ago, Moses said:

 Russia evacuated Assad.

not much to be proud about

Just now, Moses said:

Because typical "easy way" looks like this (typical American easy way). Mosul, Iraq.

I see you dont want to answer my question, just deflecting.

15 minutes ago, 10tazione said:

Apart from measuring death number in km per frontline I find very weird, your answer has nothing to do with my question:

You say Ukranian government could have easily been removed long ago. Easily = 0 deaths on Russian side and within few days, I suppose?
Instead your special operation war lost already 10.000s (note the "s" plural) on Russian side.
So why do it in the apparently not so easy way?

Russia's way to reduce own overpopulation ? 

6 minutes ago, vinapu said:

Russia's way to reduce own overpopulation ? 

Fear of not enough Wodka per family?

34 minutes ago, 10tazione said:

Fear of not enough Wodka per family?

Urban legends within brianwashed? Well...

 

Consumption in liters:

Changes in popularity at past 12 months:

4 minutes ago, Moses said:

 

 

those are Western statistic, fruit of Western propaganda and only western leaning countries are included with Russia , Belarus and China  intentionally  removed as penalty for not toeing to western narrative about war in Ukraine

 

Actually, the last data from the World Health Organization puts Russia at #17 (out of 189 countries). Most of the top-drinking countries are from cold, what I would consider depressing places. Each of the three Baltic countries ranks in the top 10. Canada bucks the trend at #57, and frigid Norway is #80. What else is there to do on those long, cold Canadian and Norwegian nights? The US is at #45, and Thailand is at #64.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_alcohol_consumption_per_capita

(the 2nd chart is the one which lists the countries from highest to lowest)

6 hours ago, Moses said:

Urban legends within brianwashed? Well...

It was just a joke, suggested by my AI.

16 hours ago, Tomtravel said:

Score! One of the best postings of the year!