Jump to content
Gay Guides Forum
Keithambrose

Arrived Bangkok

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, hank75 said:

May I point out you have a suite too and can host an orgy of your own 🤪

Ah, if only!

Posted
2 hours ago, floridarob said:

Thanks, never heard of that..... after listening to the youtube video, seems like they would be too stuck up for 99% of the posters here, lol

https://www.instagram.com/reels/Cp0gZo4D6pT/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjgV8XVxiFY

Rules (from the YouTube Video):
1- You have to be invited by the host- Can't be invited by a friend-
2- Dress code= Underwear Only- designer/ no shirts
3- Don't come empty handed- Drugs/snacks/no alcohol because people might be doing G--- 
4- Unless specified by the invite or vibe- Don't hook up there- it's a Homepas not a Sexpas- read the invite or the vibe, up to the host
5- Race/ethnic exclusivity - Asian-American/Korean/etc...

* No photos/videos
 

 

I see!

Posted
8 hours ago, Enchanted_Elixir said:

These events are called homepas.

Thanks!

Posted
6 hours ago, 10tazione said:

We now know what is happening in their room, but what is happening in your room? Did they already complain about your moaning? :)

 

 

No, I'm such a quiet soul!

Posted
3 hours ago, jason1975 said:

Of course you can host! Your suite is large enough for at least 10 guys!

He doesn’t have enough towels though 

Posted
4 hours ago, mauRICE said:

Oh perleez...the typical forum member is likely to be carrying a bus pass, not going to homepas. 😅

How did you guess!

Posted
1 hour ago, hank75 said:

He doesn’t have enough towels though 

I can order more!

Posted
5 hours ago, floridarob said:

Be the host, he seems to set the rules and Vibe.....

I don't meet the ethnic requirements!

Posted
31 minutes ago, floridarob said:

Host sets the rules...lol

Makes it easier!

Posted
6 hours ago, Keithambrose said:

I don't meet the ethnic requirements!

Among other things or should I say inter alia. 🤭🤭

Posted
Just now, mauRICE said:

Among other things or should I say inter alia. 🤭🤭

Or possibly inter alios?

  • Members
Posted

Decoding anybody? I have been to Bangkok. Most of this would have dissuaded me from visiting but I quite enjoyed the several interesting  weeks there. 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Riobard said:

Decoding anybody? I have been to Bangkok. Most of this would have dissuaded me from visiting but I quite enjoyed the several interesting  weeks there. 

Another nonsensical message. I assume that you enjoy it.

  • Members
Posted
28 minutes ago, Keithambrose said:

Another nonsensical message. I assume that you enjoy it.

Just helping you release your inner troll tension. More altruistic than fun. No, strike that a little; each time dealing with your ilk adds extra self-efficacy. As far as incomprehensible nonsense just read your own topic. The majority is “in” commentary. Is it a drunken dinner party transcript? Just clarify from the outset so as to offer a take-a-pass option, or a glossary for those with time to waste. Sheesh.

  • Members
Posted
On 1/1/2026 at 8:26 AM, Keithambrose said:

Got here this afternoon.  Decision to fly NY Eve justified.  As well as cheaper,  Suvarnabhumi was very quiet at 15.30. Straight to free Immigration  guy, got sim cards, and in car 2 mins before plane due to land. In lounge at Meridien, where male couples heavily outnumber anyone else. Considering  various competing  offers in relation to stamps! Payday in good form. 

Perhaps I’ll never learn. Take the first text pass as a clue to the mind numbing to come. Take the lame critic’s fallback urging uptake of psychotropic meds as predictive of drivel. But on that very subject, appreciate his stimulation of marketing creativity: “Keethqueef, the hot wind beneath your wings”.

Ask your in-law why you refuse to ignore content you find disagreeable while proclaiming to block me. Obsessed much? She has her work cut out, all DSM axes, inn’t? The most basic can seem the most complex. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Riobard said:

Perhaps I’ll never learn. Take the first text pass as a clue to the mind numbing to come. Take the lame critic’s fallback urging uptake of psychotropic meds as predictive of drivel. But on that very subject, appreciate his stimulation of marketing creativity: “Keethqueef, the hot wind beneath your wings”.

Ask your in-law why you refuse to ignore content you find disagreeable while proclaiming to block me. Obsessed much? She has her work cut out, all DSM axes, inn’t? The most basic can seem the most complex. 

Translation  please.

Posted
44 minutes ago, Riobard said:

Just helping you release your inner troll tension. More altruistic than fun. No, strike that a little; each time dealing with your ilk adds extra self-efficacy. As far as incomprehensible nonsense just read your own topic. The majority is “in” commentary. Is it a drunken dinner party transcript? Just clarify from the outset so as to offer a take-a-pass option, or a glossary for those with time to waste. Sheesh.

Do you talk to your patients  like this?

  • Members
Posted
52 minutes ago, Keithambrose said:

Do you talk to your patients  like this?

Unlike here, the protocol for handling narcissism that comes a clinician’s way in a treatment context is quite different. I am also, paradoxically, getting paid to be respected and the fee is much higher to be a sad sack’s punching bag. Toxic costs more.

They are paying to do some work in good faith. Somebody like you? … I’d perhaps find an excuse to not accommodate, even if it meant a white lie regarding my own adequacy. One or two per year maximum quota.

The lawyers, for example, in my practice have been typically respectful and rewarding. You wouldn’t find them trolling in a desperate ploy for relevance. Anonymity alters the picture both in terms of personal comportment and style of language.  

Lawyers in opposition and adversarial, in contrast, for example in a sitch of expert testimony, have been put in their places. The dynamic and exchange obviously contextually differs. I have been consistently disabused of the notion that they are particularly intelligent analytically or correctly anticipatory regarding opponents’ ability in relation to the subject adjudicated. But many are reasonably bright and often have unfamiliar curves tossed at them.

Their level of deference is moot and likely cloaked in resentment. I’m not completely sure of your background but I’d say you are pretty easy-peasy to compartmentalize in such a way as to amputate from day to day consciousness. You’re the guy with a low single-digit array of lazy retorts. 

I would never explicitly formulate “Asshole not specified” although it colloquially fits in some instances, and your relation would grasp the wordplay, perhaps even chuckle. Ask your in-law for translational guidance without necessarily revealing the players. That said, a family member essentially has hands tied not knowing all of the behavioural aspects of an aging geezer punter oriented to, say, seeking unprotected insertive anal intercourse with naïve and physically poorly developed and socioeconomically deprived young men abroad for pay. That might partially trump any misguided personal regard heretofore displayed. Only you know for sure what about your number fits the scenario. 

There can only be bad or neutral sexual tourism. Good sexual tourism is a misnomer and most patients, lawyers, clinicians, etc, would agree. 

  • Members
Posted
29 minutes ago, Keithambrose said:

Translation  please.

Non-manipulation SVP.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...