July 29Jul 29 3 hours ago, PeterRS2 said: Sorry but you are wrong. I have never posted my age on any Board. Ugh??? on this very thread you have been 82, 47 and more and your bio gives 52. I really cannot be arsed to read through everything again. Are you denying this? Do you have a problem?
July 29Jul 29 Author 51 minutes ago, daydreamer said: You know very well that I have never sent you a private message. Nice try. You are just being silly like a small child, with your attention-seeking behavior. Your condition is treatable, please find professional help. So I'm to blame as well because of the soccer results ⚽ Tottenham vs Sydney 1-1 Don't gamble if you don't want to lose money , I'm not your punching bag
July 29Jul 29 Author 54 minutes ago, khaolakguy said: Of course he has a problem. It's that people keep responding to his posts! He wanted to get into my knickers👙🩲 ..just like the other stalkers ! Well he won't be ..I blocked him
July 30Jul 30 10 hours ago, Patanawet said: Ugh??? on this very thread you have been 82, 47 and more and your bio gives 52. I really cannot be arsed to read through everything again. Are you denying this? Do you have a problem? Yes I totally deny it and you are not writing anything like the truth! In fact I don't know what on earth you are rambling on about. I have never posted my age other than as 47 which clearly was a joke in response to another thread (see below). I have never said I was 82 and certainly never 52. My bio does not even give an age. It is you who have the problem. What I wrote yesterday referred to an @Olddaddy post - "Yet elswhere he has said he is 62. Like I'm 47!! 🤪"
July 30Jul 30 Author 8 minutes ago, PeterRS2 said: Yes I totally deny it and you are not writing anything like the truth! In fact I don't know what on earth you are rambling on about. I have never posted my age other than as 47 which clearly was a joke in response to another thread. I have never said I was 82 and certainly never 52. My bio does not even give an age. It is you who have the problem. Oh don't give that poster the time of day Peter ...your an interesting man who contributed a lot of great posts to this forum .💛
July 30Jul 30 2 minutes ago, Olddaddy said: your an interesting man who contributed a lot of great posts to this forum .💛 That is kind - thank you.
July 30Jul 30 18 minutes ago, Olddaddy said: Oh don't give that poster the time of day Peter ...your an interesting man who contributed a lot of great posts to this forum .💛 555 You're precious. I think Patanawet was referring to you, weren't you, Patanawet and quoted PeterRS2 by mistake?
July 30Jul 30 22 minutes ago, mauRICE said: 555 You're precious. I think Patanawet was referring to you, weren't you, Patanawet and quoted PeterRS2 by mistake? When you post something by mistake, it is customary to post again to point out the mistake - not just assume you have been correct. And responding to anyone's post requires a degree of comprehension of what was actually posted and about whom!
July 30Jul 30 36 minutes ago, PeterRS2 said: And responding to anyone's post requires a degree of comprehension of what was actually posted and about whom! Yes, and I'm surprised that you didn't. I picked it up straightaway and Patanawet will probably respond if he sees the developments in this thread. It's been less than a day since his last post.
July 30Jul 30 31 minutes ago, mauRICE said: Yes, and I'm surprised that you didn't. I picked it up straightaway and Patanawet will probably respond if he sees the developments in this thread. It's been less than a day since his last post. I referred to comprehension by the reader who then makes a post. I have no idea where @Patanawet is based and whether he reads his own posts. But checking before posting takes seconds! Besides, he responded inaccurately to a post several posts ago in this discussion. Many readers may not bother looking back - especially non-members - and are not aware of the detail in the thread. So correcting the record is frankly not unimportant! The more so when I stated he was wrong and he then stated I was not wrong! He was wrong!
July 30Jul 30 33 minutes ago, PeterRS2 said: But checking before posting takes seconds! So does counting to ten instead of assuming every post made is about oneself and lashing out in response - and that includes quotes made in error.
July 30Jul 30 2 minutes ago, mauRICE said: So does counting to ten instead of assuming every post made is about oneself and lashing out in response - and that includes quotes made in error! No need to be so stupid!
July 30Jul 30 36 minutes ago, PeterRS2 said: The more so when I stated he was wrong and he then stated I was not wrong! He was wrong! "And now I will stomp my feet and throw a tantrum! You can't come play with me anymore during recess!" Err...no need to be so needy.
July 30Jul 30 2 hours ago, PeterRS2 said: Yes I totally deny it and you are not writing anything like the truth! In fact I don't know what on earth you are rambling on about. I have never posted my age other than as 47 which clearly was a joke in response to another thread (see below). I have never said I was 82 and certainly never 52. My bio does not even give an age. It is you who have the problem. What I wrote yesterday referred to an @Olddaddy post - "Yet elswhere he has said he is 62. Like I'm 47!! 🤪" Sorry. I also was referring to Old Daddy. In no way to you. Sorry to be unclear.
July 30Jul 30 1 hour ago, mauRICE said: 555 You're precious. I think Patanawet was referring to you, weren't you, Patanawet and quoted PeterRS2 by mistake? Indeed. I'm so sorry to mislead. It was 100% directed at O.D.
July 30Jul 30 5 minutes ago, Patanawet said: Sorry. I also was referring to Old Daddy. In no way to you. Sorry to be unclear. Thank you very much. I do appreciate the clarification.
July 30Jul 30 I think it is time I withdraw from this thread. I seem to be making it even more confusing with my misdirected responses to other comments. All of my responses really are meant for O.D. (bet he's loving seeing his 'name' up here so much). It's getting like the letters comments section in the Bangkok Post. OR can I blame my cats for taking over the keyboard? Sorry again.
July 30Jul 30 2 hours ago, mauRICE said: 555 You're precious. I think Patanawet was referring to you, weren't you, Patanawet and quoted PeterRS2 by mistake? Indeed, so sorry.
July 30Jul 30 53 minutes ago, Patanawet said: Indeed, so sorry. Nah, no need to apologise. It should be obvious to anyone with a modicum of common sense and sensibility that it was a mistake. Please continue to contribute. I remember you from the old fora as being a class act.
July 30Jul 30 Author 52 minutes ago, Patanawet said: I think it is time I withdraw from this thread. I seem to be making it even more confusing with my misdirected responses to other comments. All of my responses really are meant for O.D. (bet he's loving seeing his 'name' up here so much). It's getting like the letters comments section in the Bangkok Post. OR can I blame my cats for taking over the keyboard? Sorry again. U have pussy cats , oh how cute for a senile old poof 😉🤣 I guess they are your kids , how lovely for a lonely old man I actually have a few "lonely old poofs" in my apartment building that I spotted with those very small dogs .. Chihuahus? .I soon sent a letter of complaints to the Strata building committee , informing them of the tenants ,so the pets can be removed 😆from the residents lot Oh they wernt bothering me ,they were like 3 or 4 floors below my mine ,but once I spotted the Lonely .Old P walking his Chihuahua in a nearby park and take the lift back up to his apartment,with his yapping dog , I quickly wrote the email to the building manager ✉️ ...just to be nasty 😄 Apparently they put the notices up in the foyer telling residents to remove dogs after that 😁 I felt a sense of achievement after that Well you enjoy your pussy cats , do you call them named like Tabatha and dress them up in pink 🩷 clothing and put them in a pram and wheel them around ? I really hope you don't live on a apartment especially with pets !!
July 30Jul 30 1 hour ago, Olddaddy said: ...,they were like 3 or 4 floors below my mine ,but once I spotted the Lonely .Old P walking his Chihuahua in a nearby park and take the lift back up to his apartment,with his yapping dog , I quickly wrote the email to the building manager ✉️ ...just to be nasty 😄 😄 Apparently they put the notices up in the foyer telling residents to remove dogs after that 😁 Hmmm, I hope you don't forget to bring a scoop and a paper bag when you go for your walks...you know, in case you have one of your little accidents...😉
July 30Jul 30 In my condo in Bangkok one of the regulations is "no pets" - not even crows 🤪 Yet I recently discovered that the very nice Chairman of our Owners Committee has a dog in her apartment (a real one, not her husband)!
July 30Jul 30 1 hour ago, Olddaddy said: U have pussy cats , oh how cute for a senile old poof 😉🤣 I guess they are your kids , how lovely for a lonely old man I actually have a few "lonely old poofs" in my apartment building that I spotted with those very small dogs .. Chihuahus? .I soon sent a letter of complaints to the Strata building committee , informing them of the tenants ,so the pets can be removed 😆from the residents lot Oh they wernt bothering me ,they were like 3 or 4 floors below my mine ,but once I spotted the Lonely .Old P walking his Chihuahua in a nearby park and take the lift back up to his apartment,with his yapping dog , I quickly wrote the email to the building manager ✉️ ...just to be nasty 😄 Apparently they put the notices up in the foyer telling residents to remove dogs after that 😁 I felt a sense of achievement after that Well you enjoy your pussy cats , do you call them named like Tabatha and dress them up in pink 🩷 clothing and put them in a pram and wheel them around ? I really hope you don't live on a apartment especially with pets !! Is there a regulation against tenants with multiple personalities?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.