On 7/17/2025 at 2:35 AM, Moses said:

I like his face, guaranteed off if he was real, meat and bones ,  man

Totally new and quite revolutionary model. Run tests:

 

 

 

 

 

What's new about the model? Great images!

2 hours ago, maump said:

What's new about the model?

It is very smart and almost doesn't need additional third-party libraries for to generate good images.

last one would do for me had he been alive

4 hours ago, vinapu said:

last one would do for me had he been alive

So, you are not into necrophilia?

What biological developmental age variable is being entered into some of these artificial intelligence renderings of males … many that project the characteristics of age minors? Is there no capacity here to grasp the ‘where there’s smoke there’s fire’ concept when similarly virtual photos of questionable appropriateness also reside here? How does this type of brazenness shield board admin from the possibility of censorship from CSAM monitoring entities? What do you think JHS' FBI investigators, SDNY prosecutors, Gays Against Groomers, etc would make of the 2nd from last image?

Use your big heads!!!!!

14 hours ago, vinapu said:

last one would do for me had he been alive

I like you. You’re a good guy, oriented to mature men, and prolific poster of useful material. Please distance yourself. 

‘Nuff said … that it’s not likely depicting truly extant individuals doesn’t mitigate the evidence of paedophilia-adjacent material intent. And this is just from a brief scan of a slice of image content that sits on this subforum. Wake up! 

10 hours ago, Keithambrose said:

So, you are not into necrophilia?

He’s not into paedophilia, anyway. Do you think humour mitigates the implications of such content?

How should I know? You are channeling mental illness. 

12 minutes ago, Riobard said:

‘Nuff said … that it’s not likely depicting truly extant individuals doesn’t mitigate the evidence of paedophilia-adjacent material intent. And this is just from a brief scan of a slice of image content that sits on this subforum. Wake up! 

One of a few options to protect myself is to call the nonsense, the more stridently the more prophylactic in relation to the caprice of being implicated in culpability.

I am not reporting this formally but I suggest that admin snooze the board and engage in a vetting process. The simplest approach may be to just quickly redact all of the photo subfora. I doubt it’s truly contributory to the central value and mission of the board or would militate against any legit financial input that offsets the costs of running the enterprise. 

1 hour ago, Riobard said:

I am not reporting this formally but I suggest that admin snooze the board and engage in a vetting process. The simplest approach may be to just quickly redact all of the photo subfora. I doubt it’s truly contributory to the central value and mission of the board or would militate against any legit financial input that offsets the costs of running the enterprise.

For those who don't understand how these images are generated: each of these images includes a full description of the technical details, including the text on which it was generated. It is impossible to forge this text, the only option is to erase it.

In the original file of any of the images published above, the text indicates the age of the virtual person. I usually use the text "Asian man in his early twenties" or "Asian man 21 years old". I do not even use the word "boy" to avoid any "thoughts".

And yes: are you an expert in determining age from a photo?

P.S. This was discussed already in this thread. Somewhere on 4th or 5th page, also including examples how experts checking age of the person on the image.

2 hours ago, Riobard said:

How does this type of brazenness shield board admin from the possibility of censorship from CSAM monitoring entities? What do you think JHS' FBI investigators, SDNY prosecutors, Gays Against Groomers, etc would make of the 2nd from last image?

P.P.S

In your country, buying sex is illegal. And on this forum, half the sections are dedicated to discussing the conditions for buying sex - where, how much it costs, how safe it is.

Buying sex, as well as communicating for this purpose anywhere (including the Internet) is a criminal offense in Canada, this prohibition is spelled out in section 286.1 of the Criminal Code. Did you know this?

7 minutes ago, Moses said:

P.P.S

In your country, buying sex is illegal. And on this forum, half the sections are dedicated to discussing the conditions for buying sex - where, how much it costs, how safe it is.

Buying sex, as well as communicating for this purpose anywhere (including the Internet) is a criminal offense in Canada, this prohibition is spelled out in section 286.1 of the Criminal Code. Did you know this?

There is nothing you can teach me about this and the trajectory / evolution of prostitution law in Canada as I have established clinical expertise in the overall field of sexuality as well as extensive and broadly recognized expert witness status across a range of judicial entities.

I am not coming at this within a circumscribed Canadian perspective and there is a degree of permeability of global boundaries when it comes to CSAM and commercial sex work phenomena. 

You? Tour guide with proclaimed armchair expertise? I don’t know. There is no imperative among anonymous forum members to outline their CV. I optionally add personal info to make a point or shut down an obnoxious or patronizing false assumption.

1 hour ago, Moses said:

For those who don't understand how these images are generated: each of these images includes a full description of the technical details, including the text on which it was generated. It is impossible to forge this text, the only option is to erase it.

In the original file of any of the images published above, the text indicates the age of the virtual person. I usually use the text "Asian man in his early twenties" or "Asian man 21 years old". I do not even use the word "boy" to avoid any "thoughts".

And yes: are you an expert in determining age from a photo?

P.S. This was discussed already in this thread. Somewhere on 4th or 5th page, also including examples how experts checking age of the person on the image.

If you think that a textual accompaniment for a minor-age appearing male convincingly obviates the need for judicious vetting of image output, when subjective perception figures prominently in assessing the CSAM potential of content you are dumber than I thought.

JHS was repeatedly raked over the coals in relation to simulated man-boy content in which the vid collab occurred with a mature male whose age was, unequivocally, 25. 

On 1/7/2024 at 10:51 PM, Keithambrose said:

It was a joke!

You seem to be prone to having to explain the lame.

On 1/8/2024 at 2:08 AM, unicorn said:

Eek. I guess since they're not real, we don't have to check their age? A bit too youthful-looking, if you want my opinion...

Finally, a voice that can find reason. 

On 7/21/2024 at 7:36 AM, maump said:

In USA, even graphic of underage is illegal... despite a supreme court ruling.  violent graphics, video games movies and stories don't influence anyone... but a naked underage image results in immediate conversion to sex predators .

 No, they pander to paedophilia, the pathology already rooted. 

On 1/9/2024 at 1:04 AM, Keithambrose said:

Interesting point about age. Can an artificial image have an age? In UK, naked images of under 18 are illegal, I believe, but can an AI image, clearly say representing a 13 years old boy, be breaking the law.? 

https://www.iwf.org.uk/about-us/why-we-exist/our-research/how-ai-is-being-abused-to-create-child-sexual-abuse-imagery/

I thought you had a law degree by your own self-description. 

Taking a break to detoxify from the overdosed exposure to stupidity and naïveté on this subject. TBC

38 minutes ago, Riobard said:

There is nothing you can teach me about this and the trajectory / evolution of prostitution law in Canada as I have established clinical expertise in the overall field of sexuality as well as extensive and broadly recognized expert witness status across a range of judicial entities.

I have gift for you, dear. You may choose any

 

 

 

 

32 minutes ago, Moses said:

I have gift for you, dear. You may choose any

 

 

 

 

You are unwell.

These images depict an invitation to minors to come forward for deposition in relation to predatorial CSAM offenders. That you are making light of established child protection law just represents you digging yourself further into a hole. But you may be most comfortable residing in subterranean contexts. 

I feel badly for Oz and I’m willing to assist to clean up the acts of bad apples in order to sustain the integrity of a chat forum that thematically would already be subject to judgement and stigma.