ChristianPFC Posted Monday at 02:57 PM Author Posted Monday at 02:57 PM 17 hours ago, Keithambrose said: Treating the boys like a cheap commodity Assuming this is directed at me, can you quote where I did so? Quote
caeron Posted Monday at 09:29 PM Posted Monday at 09:29 PM You can certainly treat a hire as a piece of meat and dehumanize them, but I disagree that the act of engaging them is inherently dehumanizing. It's a job. I often didn't like my work. But, it paid well and I did it. Why is that any different than this? Perhaps you can argue, and I don't think I'd disagree, that most work is dehumanizing. If you're working, it's almost always because you have to. Different forms of economic vulnerability, but still most people do it because they have to. I do not subscribe to the notion that sex work is somehow inherently worse than other jobs. If you don't want to dehumanize the guys, don't be an asshole. It is amazing how many social interactions go so much better when you aren't an asshole. khaolakguy, Ian here and tm_nyc 3 Quote
floridarob Posted Tuesday at 01:03 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:03 AM 3 hours ago, caeron said: . I do not subscribe to the notion that sex work is somehow inherently worse than other jobs. Because it could be worse, like being an attorney 😳 caeron 1 Quote
Min Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago On 5/5/2026 at 8:03 AM, floridarob said: Because it could be worse, like being an attorney 😳 or a porn director hired by @Olddaddy 😄 Keithambrose and floridarob 1 1 Quote
Keithambrose Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago On 5/5/2026 at 2:03 AM, floridarob said: Because it could be worse, like being an attorney 😳 I believe that some people like being an attorney! I can't comment as I am a lawyer! A subtle distinction, perhaps. Quote
floridarob Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 9 hours ago, Keithambrose said: I can't comment as I am a lawyer! Would you sue yourself for defamation ? The comment was directed at you, btw 😉 Quote
kram987 Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago On 5/4/2026 at 2:29 PM, caeron said: You can certainly treat a hire as a piece of meat and dehumanize them, but I disagree that the act of engaging them is inherently dehumanizing. It's a job. I often didn't like my work. But, it paid well and I did it. Why is that any different than this? Perhaps you can argue, and I don't think I'd disagree, that most work is dehumanizing. If you're working, it's almost always because you have to. Different forms of economic vulnerability, but still most people do it because they have to. I do not subscribe to the notion that sex work is somehow inherently worse than other jobs. If you don't want to dehumanize the guys, don't be an asshole. It is amazing how many social interactions go so much better when you aren't an asshole. This reminds me of an article I read a long time ago by a woman sex worker. Her point was that she got to dress how she wanted to, did things she liked, set her own schedule, had tons of free time and only take clients she wanted to. She said she didn’t feel exploited or degraded. Now her high school job at McDonalds…. Quote
kram987 Posted 37 minutes ago Posted 37 minutes ago About economic exploitation, I think many maybe most people only do their jobs because they need the money. Also, what they are saying is that it is better to let them starve? I think that its usually best to let people decide for themselves what they want to do. Quote