vinapu

brave to say it loudly

perhaps she knew and also knew they don't care

that is not problem , problem is that he seems to be very popular so may be less inclined to negotiations and financial inducements. As I said here 354 times already I have serious doubts about how straight guys parading half naked in front of other guys are. Comment is general and is not related to said #17, which by the way I know as different number which he changed since

I wouldn't call boyfriend "girlfriend"

where's that beautiful cathedral ? Gloucester UK or Gloucester Idaho ?

+1

as explained in another thread there's sure thing that you favorite boy there would be also mine and since idea of going there would be yours , as per my rule posted above is you will have first shot , lol Indeed we had good time in those bars and God willing , we will have again.

you spoiling me today, thank you. Truth is I learned my lessons in the past and now indeed if I see guy I like or came to the bar to off I'm not leaving anything to chances and call him over right away. When visiting bar or spa with friend I try to stick to the rule that first shot belongs to that one who suggested to visit that bar first. But I'm not competitive and always know there's tomorrow. Spoon and 18past19 are most dangerous companions as invariably we like the same guys but so far managed to sort it out friendly ways.

as for #17 I did not have pleasure of offing him (yet ) but last Nov when visiting Freshboys with another forum member we both independently and without consultation decided that he is best looking guy in the whole bar

no, discussed that with jamiebee already, we both safe from quarrel in the bar as we have different golden boys there. I'd be more concerned to go to Freshboys with you but them I know I'll be in losing position.

Do what you can but I wish you Happy Birthday already !

this is what happens when people abandon eating chicken with cashew nuts

that's must be shortest trip report we ever saw here

I'd be even more please if I was there with jamiebee but if we don't have what we like , we like what we have

Your first statement confirms how little we know about what was going on behind the sealed borders of blood soaked paranoid regime. I we don't know how many people died to a margin of 1.5 million , what really we know? As for Bizot testimony , nobody questions it but we should remember , even if he survived inside of regime he was not in position to travel freely and talk to whomever he wanted. He saw what he saw. Guys spending their days in Nana plaza no doubt are in Thailand but will they know how to get to Grand Palace ? ............. I don't see reason why your cited experts are experts and mine are merely " experts " other than fragile ego seeking some boost . At least mine tried to answer question what was source of Khmer Rouge rise, hold on power and after their removal , still lingering semblance of popularity in countryside as Ta Mok house and Pol Pot creamation sites turned now into kind of shrines certify. I'm glad you share my lifelong interest in Cambodia but let me tell you , for reasons I rather not discuss in open forum I have strong feeling I'm bit better positioned to understand whole debacle as at certain time Cambodia's door were opened wider for some than the others.

Stomach problems in foreign country usually develop week or two after arrival as we start becoming overconfident in what we are eating. Isn't Ivermectin drug they treat horses with ? Hope you feel better today and your thoughts will start moving from toilet paper to KY

business class passengers is my guess

my guess will be because it's 1/4 of an hour

It's what you think. I tend to trust better people who visited country soon after nightmare was over. Don't even try to pretend you know better because inevitably question may follow ; " how come ? " . Those who know moved on with their lives leaving brutal past behind it' that's at all possible. As Raposa pointed out , butchers become victims. Murdering quarter of population takes a lot of both willing and forced to participants. Cambodia is country which chose to forget and move on, it's why most of perpetrators, including Pol Pot himself, died in their own beds. Never had own Nurnberg even if had plenty of own Auschvitzes and Dachaus. That seem to be nonsense but helped to avoid spiral of revenge. Case of friendship of Bizot and Duch is one of those never explained mysteries. How they managed to survive in such paranoid regime, one being foreigner and another befriending him ?

world was aware well before Vietnamese invasion, we just did not believe it's true and thought scare news are just blood soaked anecdotes.

hurrah !

in bars , no but one can off two guys and organize such show in privacy of the room if so inclined.

specially vacation time

ouch !!!

that Hun Sen was stabilizing force can't be denied and it was not easy task because foreign support for Khmer Rouge leftovers as well as some support they retained in the countryside. It's hard to believe but Ta Mok's house , one of chief KR butchers , is still preserved and can be viewed in Anlong Veng. The same with cremation site of Pot Pot. In early 80-ties I attended lecture of diplomat and scholar in the SE Asia history and politics. Two things he told us about the source of KR sort of popularity I memorized to this day - bone breaking work in he fields people chased out from the cities were forced to do, for majority of rural population was what they did day after day anyways. And second - that beneficial side effect of mass murder and extermination was that finally peasants did not need to work to pay off debts their grandparents took to finance their own wedding. World often marvels as why Cambodia did not bring to the justice those who subjected her population to such horrors from own hands. This may be, in some part , reason. At end of day there was no justice for victims but at least peace and some form of prosperity for survivors. as for Lee, I'd be interested what Hun Sen had to say about him , just to keep things even handed